HOME
NEWS
SECONDHAND SMOKE
WORKPLACE EXPOSURE
LET'S CLEAR THE AIR
TOBACCO'S TACTICS
SMOKE-FREE DOES NOT HARM BUSINESS
GETTING INVOLVED
COMMUNITY SUPPORT
LETTERS
FAVORITE SMOKE-FREE HANGOUTS
MORE INFORMATION
ABOUT
US
|
Letters of Support From
healthcare professionals to students to business owners, there is
broad-based community support for a comprehensive smoke-free regulation
in Monongalia County |
|
Smoking ban benefits we’ll see in future THE DOMINION POST -- January 15, 2012
The
faculty, staff and students of the WVU Translational Tobacco Research
Program, in partnership with the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center and
the Prevention Research Center, applaud the Monongalia County Board of
Health and the city of Morgantown for their decisive action in passing
a highly protective clean indoor air regulation. Some of the health benefits we can expect in Monongalia County include the following: A decline in heart attacks among nonsmokers A decline in smoking related cancers, especially among hospitality workers A reduced rate of smoking among adults Lower smoking initiation rates among teens A decline in asthma attacks and respiratory illnesses
Immeasurable benefits include a more pleasant environment in clubs,
music venues and other places of entertainment.
Even smokers’ health will benefit as their absorption of cigarette
smoke toxins will not be compounded by exposure to high concentrations
of smoke particles in bars and restaurants. An appealing, smoke-free
environment will help us recruit faculty to area colleges and
universities, and as importantly, skilled professionals and new
businesses to our community. Moreover, because West Virginia has one of
the highest youth smoking rates in the United States, this new
regulation is critical for our town to set a positive example for our
children — clean indoor air regulations are known to discourage
children from taking up the habit. We
extend our sincere congratulations and gratitude to every individual,
professional and public official who played a role in achieving this
historic public health policy. We also thank The Dominion Post for its
continuous coverage of this issue over the past four years,
demonstrating the invaluable influence of local media on positive
public policy change. Kimberly Horn, Professor of Community Medicine -- Morgantown
You cannot change all minds on smoking THE DOMINION POST -- January 15, 2012
This
smoking ban took way too long to get passed. I have read several
articles in various papers stating that this process had to be thought
out. By whom, and for what? And furthermore, what was there to think
about? I cannot believe we have
members who are on a Board of Health making decisions — a major one
like this — and it takes four years to decide. Four years? This is
uncalled for. I do believe that Ruby
Memorial Hospital, or Monongalia General Hospital, should take four
years to decide if any of the Board of Health members need urgent
serious medical care. Gee, let me think ... it may take us four years
to think this out. These board members
do not know how to act on an urgent, important bill that affects
everyone’s health, including their own. I do believe they may have been
on the job too long. Maybe meetings have become boring to them. They
could be tired of listening to people, or have lost interest in what
matters to people. If you are tired of being on the Board of Health,
maybe you should rethink why you are there and whom you serve.
Why do so many of you think you have the right to smoke anywhere you
want, and have no respect for those who do not? The bars, hot spots and
gentlemens’ clubs just need to get over it. Also, smokers need to stop
standing in doorways to have a smoke in a public place when people are
walking through a door to get into a business.
I have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and have never
smoked — it’s all secondhand. I live it every day. If you are a smoker
and have COPD, do I feel sorry for you? No! You have to make a choice:
Smoke or breathe? And some of you just keep on smoking. Stay home,
drink your beer, coffee or whatever and smoke yourself to death without
harming others. That is the choice that you have. Think about the harm
you are doing your children — ear infections, colds — who have no
choice. They go to school smelling like smoke because you want to
smoke. Think about how much milk you can buy your children when paying
for fewer doctor’s visits. I could go on and on, but will not. Some
minds you cannot change. Odale Goodwin -- Morgantown
Thanks to city manager for smoking ban effort THE DOMINION POST -- January 14, 2012
In December 1991, the Monongalia County Board of Health (BOH) enacted a
smoking regulation. While modest (50 percent of restaurant seats were
to be “smoke free”), it was the first regulation in our state. It went
into effect the following spring. It took the Morgantown City Council
to get things started by enacting an ordinance in July 1991.
Twenty years later, the City Council passed a very strong ordinance.
And this week, our BOH enacted a very comprehensive smoking regulation.
I applaud the actions of our Board of Health, as well as the City
Council for bring this health protection to everyone who lives, works
or visits our county. This means we have young adults that were infants
and toddlers when the first actions were taken in 1991. Their children
will live in a much healthier community then the one they grew up
in. In particular, I want to thank
[city manager] Terrence Moore for leading the effort to bring the city
and BOH officials together on a very good regulation. Moore has been in
Morgantown for just more than a year. His leadership, experience and
diplomatic skills all came into play. Council made a good choice when
they selected him to be our city manager. I have seen him at Pedestrian
Safety Board meetings, and I know he is making the rounds of meetings
with neighborhood associations, all of whom have expressed their
appreciation for his work. With this ban
going into effect, I will be but one of many nonsmokers I know who will
now be able to go to establishments that up until now, we have not
frequented. What is still up in the
air is WVU’s policy. It has been over two years since WVU first began
to consider enacting a tobacco prohibition. More than 500 campuses
across the country have done so. It is time for WVU to do the same. Robert Anderson -- Morgantown
Others should follow smoking ban example THE DOMINION POST -- January 13, 2012
My thanks and congratulations go out to the Monongalia County Board of
Health members who voted to uphold the public health interests of all
of Monongalia County’s citizens and who chose not to discriminate
against those who work in and visit bars.
Other counties without such a ban should surely follow suit — and soon
— if for no other reason than to avoid a lawsuit by an employee of a
bar who develops a respiratory illness or any chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD) or autoimmune disorder (Raynaud’s syndrome)
related to smoking. Unfortunately, in
many counties without such a ban, it will probably take a significant
legal suit to combat the cronyism and narrow political interests that
have so far trumped common sense. Thank you again, Monongalia County Board of Health. Nancy W. Parks -- Fairmont
Gratifying to see how far county has come THE DOMINION POST -- January 13, 2012
Heartfelt congratulations to all the good people who worked so hard to
encourage the Monongalia County Board of Health to adopt the wonderful
comprehensive clean indoor regulation. I was
a Morgantown resident from 1985 to 2001. In the late 1980s and early
1990s I was privileged to be part of a group called GASP (Group to
Alleviate Smoking Pollution). After
much hard work and controversy, we were thrilled when Monongalia County
adopted the state’s first county-wide clean indoor air regulation in
1992. It is very gratifying to see how far Monongalia County has come in the past 20 years. Kenyon Stebbins -- Harbor Springs, Mich.
Recent process to OK smoking ban exemplary THE DOMINION POST -- January 12, 2012
The Monongalia County Board of Health and Morgantown City Council have
every reason to be proud of their unanimous approval of a strong
smoke-free law. Soon everyone can
enjoy all of what our county and Morgantown have to offer or take a job
without having to ask themselves if it is worth the risk.
This action may well have the most far-reaching benefit of anything
else these public officials accomplish in their service careers. Lives
will be saved and illnesses will decline. Our quality of life and our
city’s image will be greatly enhanced. The
collaboration over the past months between the two public bodies has
been exemplary and City Manager Terrence Moore deserves special
recognition for deftly navigating every challenge and planning for a
smooth implementation. May this
process serve as a model for policy change throughout West Virginia and
beyond. How wonderful for our community to be at the top of news for
leading the way to improved health. Catherine Whitworth -- Morgantown
Congratulation to all on Mon’s smoking ban THE DOMINION POST -- January 11, 2012
Monongalia County took an enormous step toward improving health when
our Board of Health unanimously passed a strong clean indoor air
regulation Monday. My hat is off to everyone who had a hand in this
effort. Special thanks to City Manager Terrence Moore,
Christina Mickey with the Smoke Free Initiative of West Virginia,
members of the Breathe Easy Alliance of Morgantown, as well as
Morgantown City Council and members of the Board of Health. What a
wonderful, healthy way to start the New Year! Congratulations everyone.
Valerie Frey-McClung -- Westover
Smoking ban reflects best reasons for laws THE DOMINION POST -- January 11, 2012
I was happy to hear about the recent unanimous vote to ban smoking at
bars and restaurants in Monongalia County. It is amazing that it has
taken so long to reach such a common sense decision, considering that
the link between smoking and cancer was scientifically evident, even in
the 1920s.
It seems to me that overall, cigarette smoking causes people nothing
but harm. I do not consider our tobacco companies to be providing any
legitimate goods or services. On the contrary, they are selling an
unethical product that is addictive and health-destroying.
Eradication of smoking-related illness would in the long run bring
about prosperity. I would never go into any restaurant that was full of
smoke. How could I enjoy the food, how could I breathe? Now that I know smoking is banned, I am more likely to go into a bar or restaurant (in Monongalia County).
What about the waiters, bartenders, cooks and the other employees in
such businesses who would be subjected to cigarette smoke constantly
while on the job? Is it right to say, “Well, of course secondhand smoke
is bad for our employees and customers, but if we banned smoking, our
business might lose revenue, we can’t have that!”
I applaud the Monongalia County Board of Health’s decision to put true
prosperity and quality of life for everyone over shortsighted greed and
fear. I hope that in the future our laws more often reflect reason and
benevolence, as this one does. Darien Flores -- Morgantown
EDITORIALBoard of Health’s decision on smoking ban better late, than never THE DOMINION POST -- January 10, 2012
The Monongalia County Board of Health’s (BOH) unanimous vote Monday on
the Clean Indoor Air Act was a whole lot more than just a breath of
fresh air.
It was confirmation that members of the BOH were ready to live up to
their primary obligation — to protect the public’s health and safety.
Whether their decisions mirror public opinion or are in line with
promises or threats, should never deter them from meeting their
responsibility.
We applaud the Board of Health today for coming to this realization.
Though this vote comes almost four years to the date when our newspaper
first endorsed this initiative, it’s still good news.
It’s especially good news for thousands of employees and patrons of
establishments that will be affected by this ban, which goes into
effect in mid-March.
But it’s also good news for how our system is supposed to work. Of
course, everyone wishes it worked faster, but no one ever promised that
such great policy changes came in timely little packages.
This effort featured all the best and worst of self-government, ranging
from raucous hearings and reams of public comment, to court action and
ethics complaints.
No, government doesn’t regulate common sense, but it can regulate
public health and safety in public places and it should. This was not a
case where the facts were few, and the experts were many, either.
The facts were overwhelming. Only five years ago, the U.S. surgeon
general warned there is no such thing as a safe level of secondhand
smoke.
As for the experts, though science can be almost as tempestuous as
politics, of late, there is no disagreement about the risks of
secondhand smoke in the medical or health care community.
And anyone who chooses to believe that government cannot regulate how
their business or bar operates ignores the fact that such
establishments are already subject to many health regulations.
Our intent is not to upbraid the BOH for its delay on approving this
law. Admittedly, we were disappointed at times by its actions: However,
we were never discouraged.
Often it seemed like the BOH might do the right thing, but was cowed by
fear of a backlash, which is not uncommon. Every appointed or elected
official wrestles with making such tough decisions.
But in this instance, the BOH was obligated to act upon the science and
in accord with its mission to protect the public’s health — not to
comply with anyone’s opinion or the demands of special interests.
Fear of taking such steps sometimes can be stifling. But we think the
BOH and the public is finally breathing a sigh of relief, today. Congratulations to city, county on smoking ban THE DOMINION POST -- January 1, 2012
This is to applaud both the Monongalia County Board of Health and the
Morgantown City Council and City Manager for their on-going,
collaborative efforts to pass and enforce a strong public and workplace
smoking ban. Mon County and Morgantown will again be able to claim
“being out in front” when it comes to promoting health of their
citizens.
Passage of Clean Indoor Air Regulations (CIARs) is one of four major
goals for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National
Tobacco Control and Prevention Program (of which West Virginia is a
participant). Enactment of CIARs is also recommended by such agencies
as: the Institute of Medicine, the American Medical Society, the
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers, to name a few.
Hundreds of other agencies and organizations also conclude that the
only way to effectively eliminate health risks associated with exposure
to secondhand cigarette smoke (SHS) is to completely ban smoking.
Economic as well as epidemiologic evidence justifies the implementation
and enforcement of no-smoking policies at the workplace and other
public settings. Failure to implement and enforce such CIARs will have
predictable adverse health and economic outcomes for both employees and
employers.
Economic studies continue to prove that restaurants and bars do not
suffer from lost revenue when smoking bans are implemented. In fact,
business revenue is maintained or it increases. After all, 80 percent
of West Virginia’s residents (and visitors) are NOT smokers or
tobacco-users.
Congrats to the people of Monongalia County and Morgantown for its
forward looking and progressive leadership, and for your soon-to-be
even healthier environment! It is logical to protect the overwhelming
majority of people of Mon County from the negative health impact of SHS
by restricting public and workplace smoking. The benefits include not
only better health but cost savings to businesses. “Smoking bans can
have a substantial impact on public health. The savings, as measured in
human lives, is undeniable.” (from Institute of Medicine Report,
October 2009). Bruce W. Adkins, M.S.; PA -- Charleston
Another plea for a smoke-free county THE DOMINION POST -- December 22, 2011
I just wanted to say that I am completely in support of smoke free
workplaces and the ordinance, regulations and actions to be implemented
to make smoke free workplaces common throughout Monongalia County.
As the child of a father who died from COPD in 2004, I fully know and
understand the impact and damage cigarette smoke and smoking does to
people. Even if one is not the smoker, by breathing the secondhand
smoke of smokers in the workplace compromises the viability of healthy
lives. Therefore, I entirely support the initiatives to make Monongalia
workplaces smoke free 100 percent.
While I respect the rights of persons who smoke, I also equally respect
the rights of those who are non-smokers like myself to be able to work
in places which are smoke-free and do not compromise our health.
Paul Templeton -- Morgantown Keep air smoke free in Monongalia County THE DOMINION POST -- December 18, 2011 I
want everyone to be protected from secondhand smoke and keep smoke-free
air in all workplaces, and I encourage them (the Monongalia County
Board of Health) to pass this regulation (a countywide smoking ban). Xinya Zhang -- Morgantown EDITORIAL Time to light smoking ban -- Morgantown should proceed with and enforce ordinance THE DOMINION POST -- December 11, 2011
A recent comment by the Monongalia County Board of Health’s (BOH)
chairman confirms what some say about public entity.
As recent as last week, he said that although he’s a nonsmoker, he
could not stop someone from doing a legal activity — such as smoking —
just because he didn’t do it.
But the issue of a smoking ban in public places has never been about
ideology or “rights” — it’s a matter of public safety.
Almost four years ago — Jan. 20, 2008 — our newspaper, in an editorial
opinion, first called on the BOH to extend a smoking ban to all public
workplaces.
Since then, we have published nearly a dozen such editorials and the
BOH is still delaying its decision on this issue. We’ve come to expect that from the BOH, but not accept it. However, this year the BOH managed to infect Morgantown with its delay tactics.
In June, City Council unanimously passed a smoking ban in public
places. At that time, it agreed to delay the ban’s effective date from
60 days to 90 days to allow city officials time to work with the BOH on
enacting a similar countywide ban.
Then, just days before the Oct. 1 deadline, council again agreed to
delay the ban’s implementation, to Jan. 1.
Now, council may allow its ban to take effect, but not enforce it. At
least until the BOH passes a smoking ban and the city amends its
ordinance to reflect a countywide law. We urge City Council to implement its ban Jan. 1 and to begin enforcing it with no exemptions. If the BOH ever approves a smoking ban, and only if, then council may want to amend its ordinance. Some often argue that a smoking ban will be bad for business. No, a smoking ban will be good for business. So let’s find out while we’re waiting on the BOH to fulfill its responsibility.
April will mark the 20th anniversary of the first-ever restriction on
smoking in West Virginia. That 1992 regulation passed by Monongalia
County’s BOH was admittedly weak. For instance, it only required 50
percent of restaurant seating to be smoke free. Yet, that was progress then.
Today our county is one of only a handful in West Virginia, never mind
the nation, that allows work places to permit smoking, including bars
and restaurants.
And never mind that the U.S. surgeon general in 2006 said there are no
safe levels of secondhand smoke or the EPA’s finding in 1993 that
secondhand smoke was a Group A carcinogen. Public health is not a matter of opinion or business. Yes, it is complex, but it confirms the common good.
McDowell County still ahead of the curve THE DOMINION POST -- November 27, 2011
It’s time that the Monongalia County Board of Health and the
Morgantown City Council both enact clean indoor air regulations that
will comprehensively protect its citizens from the deadly dangers of
secondhand smoke.
It has amazed me that the “most educated” county in West
Virginia is one of the last (19 counties have passed such laws) to pass
such regulations.
With the clean indoor air movement in West Virginia and other
states continuing strong, the strong science about the link between
exposure to secondhand smoke and heart attacks, and the outpouring of
community support — there is no acceptable reason to delay.
As a resident of McDowell County, I am used to the ridicule,
scorn and embarrassment that our poverty, economics and health
statistics award us; but in this case, we are proudly ahead of the
curve. We have greater protection from secondhand smoke than Monongalia
County. Don’t delay. Lives and families are at risk. Donald Reed Jr. -- Welch
EDITORIAL There will always be a reason to wait; City Council should agree to no further delays on implementing its smoking ban THE DOMINION POST -- November 21, 2011
If we wait around until the smoke clears at the Monongalia County
Board of Health (BOH), it might be too late. In case no one’s noticed,
there will always be reasons to wait for the BOH to implement a smoking
ban. Of course, there will always be reasons, not results. Earlier this
year, Morgantown City Council agreed to delay the effective date for a
smoking ban it approved in mid-June — twice — to allow time to work
with the BOH on enacting a similar, countywide ban. The first time
council delayed was during the actual approval of its ordinance,
extending its effective date from 60 days to 100 days. Then days before
the Oct. 1 deadline, Council again agreed to hold up its ban, to Jan.
1, 2012. Prior to that move, we wrote on Aug. 26, “Anyone familiar with
the ebb and flow of the proposed countywide smoking ban knows all too
well this issue has been smoldering for way too long.” For instance, up
until this summer the BOH’s own proposal had been for three years ago —
since May 2008. Last week, after two public hearings hosted by the BOH,
it decided that any action on a countywide smoking ban must wait until
at least January. That’s after Morgantown’s ban is set to go into
effect. There will be always be another reason for the BOH to wait on a
smoking ban. Businesses will always complain they are not prepared.
Some smokers, who may not even smoke in their homes or vehicles, will
always maintain it’s their right to smoke in a bar. And City Council
may continue to trust the BOH is prepared to act. So what does council
do now. Anything? Something? Here’s one thing it should not do: Agree
to any further delays on the effective date of Morgantown’s smoking ban
to appease anyone. Furthermore, contact WVU’s administration about a
campuswide smoking ban. It’s only been considering that one for two
years. Sometimes, we get the impression there are no reams of empirical
data on the dangers of secondhand smoke. That many states, hundreds of
counties and scads of metropolitan areas — from coast to coast — didn’t
enact smoking bans years ago. Meanwhile, for some 20 years, our city
and this county have just sat there waiting on the time to be just
right. President Lincoln once said, “Things may come to those who wait
... but only the things left by those who hustle.” Lest we forget, the
smoking ban in Lincoln County, W.Va. ... that one went into effect in
2001. And the ban in Lincoln, Neb. ... that got under way in 2007.
Well, if nothing else, we can always hustle smokes.
EDITORIAL Smoking proposal may be on the line -- Upcoming public comment period is a chance to state the case for reason THE DOMINION POST -- November 15, 2011 Any last requests?
And don’t say a cigarette, because that might not even be an
option after Thursday’s meeting of the Monongalia County Board of
Health (BOH).
Though it’s uncertain whether the BOH will vote on a proposed
countywide smoking ban at its 9 a.m. meeting, we’re hoping it does
after hearing from the public.
That session at the Health Department is one of two to provide an
opportunity to anyone to sound off on this proposal. The other meeting
will be at 5:30 p.m. at Morgantown’s Public Safety Building.
This proposal does provide exemptions for business outlets that
mainly sell tobacco products — and at least one that is primarily in
business for using them. It also allows hotels and motels to set aside
20 percent of their rooms to allow smoking. Otherwise, this ban will extend to every public workplace, including bars and restaurants.
The city of Morgantown has already passed a public smoking ban
that will go into effect Jan. 1, 2012, despite whatever the BOH
decides. But the best case scenario is the BOH approves a smoking ban
by year’s end and the city tweaks its ordinance to match the county’s
law. Our newspaper has championed a countywide smoking ban in all public places for nearly five years, now.
During that time, practically every tactic known to bureaucracies
has been employed to not approve a smoking ban. When all along, the
primary obligation of this particular bureaucracy was to protect the
public’s health in this county.
Most of us are willing to move on and forgive those who tabled
this proposal for years. Who resorted to obfuscation and stalling any
up-or-down vote on it. Who attempted to shroud public comments in
anonymity. And who seemingly ignored the vast body of data on
secondhand smoke that labels it a major health risk.
It’s time to put this measure to a vote. We hope this countywide
ban on smoking is approved — unanimously. As important as this measure
is there’s something else at stake here: Public opinion. No, that doesn’t mean whoever makes the most noise will decide this proposal.
These public comment periods are designed to allow everyone a
chance to state their case with reason. We often refer to it in our
editorials as soft words, hard arguments. That’s not to say reason
always bests popular opinion or loud demonstrations.
However, that’s where we have to trust our elected and appointed
leaders — who are charged with making the tough decisions will not
flinch. Even if it means they will face a fussilade of protests without blindfolds, later.
Morgantown Health Board Members Obligated To Do Duty THE DOMINION POST -- November 4, 2011 Is ignoring one’s sworn duty to protect the public health OK?
According to West Virginia State Code 16-2-1, local boards of health
“are responsible for matters relating to the public health of their
respective counties or municipalities.”
“Environmental health protection is one of three areas of basic public
health services each local board of health must offer,” and this
includes “addressing clean air” and provision of protection from
secondhand tobacco smoke in their respective jurisdictions.
State Code also offers that, “A local board of health member may be
removed for official misconduct, incompetence, neglect of duty.”
Question: Isn’t ignoring the proven facts regarding smoking,tobacco
use, secondhand smoke and clean indoor air regulation inconsistent with
a health board’s mission?
Please know that I am writing this letter as somewhat of a bystander,
as I am not a Monongalia County resident. However, I do frequently
visit the area because of both work and pleasure, and I have close
family members who live in, near Morgantown.
My family’s health remains a major concern for me. While they live in
one of the most progressive areas of the entire country, there remains
a health concern for my family because of a indecisive health board who
still allows a major toxic health concern that adversely affects the
public. All residents and visitors of Monongalia County deserve better attention to their health!
I am asking each member of the Monongalia County Board of Health to
fulfill your sworn charge as a public health board member, and to pass
and immediately enforce a comprehensive, no exemptions smoking ban for
all of Monongalia County. Bruce W. Adkins -- Nitro
The smoking ban is long overdue THE DOMINION POST -- October 30, 2011
I am writing in reference to the smoke-free ordinance for Morgantown
and the impending ordinance for Monongalia County. Although many
opponents have bemoaned the possible loss of income and the possibility
of loss of employment for their workers, a 5-year study from the state
of Washington found no negative effects on any sector of the
hospitality industry. Another study that focused on the effects of
smoke free laws on taverns in municipalities in Wisconsin had similar
results. I want to commend City Council for their passage and continued pursuit of the smokefree ordinance.
I would also urge the Monongalia County Board of Health to press
forward and get this obviously healthy ordinance in effect for the
entire county sooner rather than later.
Servers who won’t be constantly subjected to smoke, diners and bar
patrons who would prefer not to be inundated with another’s habits, and
even the smokers themselves will gain benefits from the passage and
implementation of the ordinance. The value of smokefree establishments for everyone cannot be understated. Let’s “git ‘er done.” Stacy North -- Morgantown
City should stick to its 2012 smoking ban THE DOMINION POST -- October 23, 2011
Recently I attended my first Relay for Life meeting to discuss the
upcoming fundraising event for the American Cancer Society on June 1-2,
2012. While there I learned that just 8 percent of the funds raised at
Relay Life events are used for administrative purposes; the remaining
92 percent actually go toward cancer research, advocacy, education and
service.
One aspect of cancer education is teaching everyone about the
consequences of secondhand smoke,which can affect everyone since there
is no “safe level” of this involuntary smoke.
Currently, the Morgantown City Council has passed an ordinance to make
Morgantown a smoke-free city by banning smoking in all enclosed public
places. However, implementation has been delayed until Jan. 1, 2012, as
the Board of Health (BOH) and city officials consider extending this
ban to cover a larger portion of Monongalia County.
I ask that the BOH let the regulation stand as is and allow it to go
into effect on the anticipated date of Jan. 1, 2012.
While I appreciate the steps the City Council and BOH have taken to
protect employees and patrons and thank them for their efforts, I urge
them to take the final step to begin creating a cleaner and safer
environment for Morgantown and Monongalia County. Kathy J. Girod -- Smithfield, PA.
Thanks for effort to get Mon County smoke-free THE DOMINION POST -- October 16, 2011 My
wife and I want to thank you for creating a smoking regulation in
Morgantown. My wife is a three-time survivor of brain tumors and we
have a 9-month-old granddaughter that she and I want to watch graduate
from high school and grow up cancer-free. There is nothing worse than
having to avoid businesses because we can’t stand the smell of
secondhand smoke. We long for the day when we will hear the words, “We
have a cure.” Until then, we need to be as safe as possible against all
cancer-causing agents. Thank you again for helping to save lives and
billions of dollars in health care for us and our future generations.
Please keep the process going to make Monongalia County tobacco free.
Brenda and Benjamin Bunner Jr. -- Fairmont
County, city need to OK comprehensive ban THE DOMINION POST -- October 16, 2011
Learn to pick your battles.
What is it going to take for our “Well City” to step up to the plate
and do the right thing in passing a countywide smoking ban? In the long
run, what is more important, taking a stand to improve our indoor air
and protecting all employees in the county, or exempting those who
think their profits might be compromised if they have to change their
way of doing business?
One of my last memories of my father, who refused to give up
cigarettes, is of his singed eyebrows and second degree burns on his
face because he had to have a cigarette while waiting for transport to
the hospital after a stroke that robbed him of his sight and
coordination. Since he couldn’t operate his child-proof lighter he lit
coffee filters on the stove to light his cigarette. He died weeks
later. No matter what I did as an adult, I could not convince him to
quit smoking. I lost that battle. He lost years of life.
I come from a family of smokers. I smoked as a teenager (to aggravate
my parents) and now cringe at the memories of actively smoking in my
place of business that exposed children to cigarette smoke. While I
can’t go back and correct that insensitive mistake, I can lend my voice
to the efforts of the Breathe Easy Alliance of Morgantown to ask the
Monongalia County Board of Health and Morgantown City Council to
actively pass a regulation that is timely, comprehensive and in the
interest of public health. Let’s put one in the “W” column for public
health. Sharon Brinkman-Windle -- Morgantown
Thanks to all for effort on smoke-free county THE DOMINION POST -- October 14, 2011
Thank you Morgantown City Council for passing the smoke free ordinance and standing firm.
Thank you to the city manager, Terrence Moore, for working with the
Monongalia County Board of Health to create a plan that will protect
all the residents in Monongalia County. And thanks to the Board of
Health for creating a committee to work on this issue that affects
every life in Monongalia County. Please continue to work together to
implement a countywide smoke-free ban as soon as possible.
Each day, our residents are subjected to health risks as we enter
public places that do not protect us from secondhand smoke.Secondhand
smoke is linked to lung cancer, heart attacks, asthma and chronic
respiratory problems. Many people are not aware of
the dangers to themselves and others caused by smoking and secondhand
smoke.Children are especially vulnerable to the effects of secondhand
smoke. As a four-time cancer survivor, I know that
smoking harms virtually every organ in the body. All cancer survivors
would like to see fewer cancer diagnoses and fewer cancer deaths in
West Virginia. This will be a good beginning for Monongalia County. Our children deserve to grow up in a smoke-free environment. Gerri Angoli -- Morgantown
WV PRC Board urges county, city to enact smoking ban THE DOMINION POST -- October 8, 2011
The
West Virginia Prevention Research Center (PRC) brings academic
researchers, community members and public health agencies together to
formulate effective strategies to promote health and prevent disease.
The PRC’s volunteer Community Partnership Board (CPB) includes health
care providers and representatives from the business
community, community organizations and public health agencies. CPB
members share an interest in making a difference in their communities.
Therefore, one of our key functions is to identify community needs and
priorities and to seek public health policies that address
these needs. Evidence based public health policies are policies
that have been proven
to have a positive effect on community health. Examples include
requiring vaccinations for children, adding fluoride to public water
supplies and adopting clean indoor air regulations. Many
members of the Community Partnership Board who have visited Morgantown
and Monongalia County are surprised and dismayed to find that such a
progressive, well educated and economically stable community has failed
to protect residents, students and visitors from the preventable health
hazards associated with secondhand smoke exposure. We urge Morgantown’s
City Council and the Monongalia County Board of Health to implement a
comprehensive clean indoor air policy that would prohibit smoking in
all public places and workplaces, without exception. It is within these
policymakers’ power to have an immediate, positive impact on the health
of the citizens of this community. Everyone —
employees, students, residents and visitors alike— deserves protection
from secondhand smoke in all indoor public places and workplaces. John P. Giroir & Chuck Conner W.Va. Prevention Research Center’s Community Partnership Board
Freedom up in smoke with such a mindset THE DOMINION POST --September 22, 2011
I read with interest a letter to the editor about the smoking
ban (DP-Sept. 14). I certainly see the writer’s point of
view. But consider this: Cigarette smoking kills
434,000 Americans each year, more than alcohol, car accidents, drunk
driving, cocaine, crack, heroin, homicide, suicide, fires and AIDS
combined. The national health care related
costs of smoking could fund West Virginia’s state government for the
next 25 years. Some 2,000 children start smoking each day in this country, they are all below 17 years of age. Freedom is the greatest thing in the world — free to be dumb is not freedom. V.K. Raju, M.D. -- Morgantown
Commission needs to fill BOH seat THE DOMINION POST --September 14, 2011
The Monongalia County Commission owes it to the public to name a
qualified replacement to the county’s Board of Health (BOH).
Although I appreciate the leadership of the commissioners, they are not
doing their job this time. It is unconscionable that the summer has
passed without filling this position.
According to The Dominion Post, there are at least nine applicants who
have submitted letters of interest for the position. There are
undoubtedly some highly qualified applicants.
In 2008, the commissioners did the right thing by appointing Bob
Wheeler to the board. Wheeler is a retired [federal] National Institute
of Occupational Safety and Health employee with a master’s degree
in public health from Harvard. His professional life has been dedicated
to examining complex health issues and working hard. When asked to do a
job for the BOH, Wheeler does his homework and produces high quality
recommendations that serve the best interests of Monongalia
County’s residents.
Now is the time for the County Commission to step up again and appoint
a qualified person to help lead the area in dealing with life-and-death
related health issues.
The mission of the Monongalia County Health Department is to strive to
achieve a healthy community by protecting and promoting public health
through education, training, advocacy and the provision of health
services. There are important issues confronting Monongalia County,
such as consideration of a countywide smoking ban. The County
Commission is urged to complete the board so the public can benefit
from its leadership. Dr. Bill Reger-Nash -- Stewartstown
Commission should do its job on health board
THE DOMINION POST -- September 7, 2011
The
Dominion Post was right on the money in its coverage (once again) of
the delays in getting something done about our county’s weak
smoking regulation. In your news article and editorial
of Sunday, you noted the [Monongalia] County Commission’s
stalling on appointing someone to fill a vacancy on the Board of Health
[BOH]. A responsible commission would have addressed
the upcoming vacancy by either reappointing Bob Bell to another term,
or going through a process of recruiting and then appointing a
replacement in time for that person to take that seat prior to July 1.
Now we learn that the commission — more than two months later
— has not even begun talking to people who expressed an interest
in being appointed. I recall [commissioner] Asel
Kennedy saying a few years ago that the BOH should be run like a
business. I wonder how that squares with a failure to put someone on
the BOH to run that “business.” With its
current membership of four people, as you pointed out, two people are
sufficient to delay anything being done, since a 2-2 vote is not
sufficient to pass a motion. Voters who elected the
three current County Commission members did not choose them with the
hope they would shirk their duty, which in this case, they clearly have
done. I agree with The Dominion Post that the
commission needs to act now. They should review applicants immediately,
go through their considerations and make an appointment. I do not buy
the excuse that they don’t want to pick someone who could be a
swing vote on amendments to the county’s smoking regulation.
Candidates not comfortable with that possibility need only to remove
their names from consideration. It is likely that most, if not all, of
the nine people who submitted their names would have no problem casting
their vote. People in Monongalia County deserve a Board
of Health with five members. It may be months before the BOH actually
brings possible amendments for a vote. We should not have to wait
months and months for the County Commission to appoint someone. Robert Anderson -- Morgantown EDITORIAL Appointment smoldering: County Commission should fill Board of Health vacancy THE DOMINION POST -- September 4, 2011 Do you smell something burning?
We do. The burning need to fill the vacancy on the Monongalia County
Board of Health (BOH) has been smoldering way too long.
The fifth seat on the BOH became vacant June 30. Since then, the
Monongalia County Commission has received nearly 10 applicants. Yet it has failed to conduct a single interview or show any sign it plans to fill this appointment anytime soon.
One commissioner has indicated he would prefer to delay this
appointment until the current four-member BOH has reached a decision on
a countywide smoking ban. He does not want to be responsible for naming
a possible swing vote to the board.
Though that may indicate this decision will or won’t result in a 2-2
tie. This appointment should not hinge on any one issue.
Clearly, basing this appointment on such criteria turns the task into a
political one, and not one focused on the public’s health.
Smoking bans aside, the BOH also looks after our Health Department,
which offers many services not offered in most counties in our state.
Among those services are programs like Women, Infants and Children, a
dental clinic, family planning, an immunization clinic and many nursing
services.
The board also oversees the Health Department’s annual budget, which
tops $325,000, making it one of the largest line items in county
spending.
Of course the BOH is also a policymaking board. And if God or the devil
— depending on who you ask — is in the details of policy, so is
politics. The county’s approach to these appointments is shrouded in
self-interest.
We are not encouraging the commission to abandon deliberation or make
this appointment based simply on any timeline for a smoking ban.
However, the commission should certainly not delay acting on this
appointment in order to stave off a decision on a smoking ban or any
other issue.
Given the commission’s cavalier approach throughout the process of
filling the vacancy on the BOH, don’t be shocked if this takes months. We are concerned that any good regulation, including a smoking ban, can now be blocked by a tie vote on the BOH.
There is no good reason for the county to delay this decision. Conduct
the necessary interviews, do the background checks and make a decision.
The commission’s charge is to act in the best interest of this
community — not special interest groups — no matter the consequences. A fire is burning under this appointment. Time to make a decision and put it out.
EDITORIAL Time to light this smoking ban: Council should not delay implementing smoking ban to accommodate BOH THE DOMINION POST -- August 26, 2011
If there’s a deal, at least it won’t be in a smoke-filled room.
Morgantown’s City Hall and Monongalia County’s Health Department
facility, where its Board of Health (BOH) meets, are both
smoke-free. The deal we refer to is the possibility Morgantown may
delay its smoking ban’s effective date to accommodate the BOH on a
countywide smoking ban. Recently, we reported that
the city manager may ask City Council to suspend implementing its ban
in all workplaces, including restaurants and bars, set to take effect
Oct. 1. The city manager and city attorney recently met with the BOH’s
representatives to discuss expanding the ban to cover the entire
county. But now it appears the city’s administration is lobbying
council to revise Morgantown’s timeline on its smoking ban in the
interim. If City Council agrees to delay the effective date of its law,
it would take nearly a month to make that change.
Although we unequivocally support the BOH passing a countywide
smoking ban, the time for further delays on this issue are over.
We encourage the city manager to continue negotiating with the
BOH on achieving a countywide smoking ban. His initiative on this issue
and that of several business owners who have had a change of heart on
this ban are commendable. Yet, these talks should not stall the city’s
law from taking effect. When City Council unanimously
passed its smoking ban in late June, it marked three years since the
BOH had tabled its own proposal in May 2008. Anyone familiar with the
ebb and flow of the proposed countywide smoking ban knows all too well
this issue has been smoldering for way too long. Granted, City Council
passed its law in quick order when it came on its agenda. However, it
delayed action on a smoking ban — unrelated to the BOH — for nearly a
year beforehand. And need we remind anyone that WVU has been studying,
reviewing and thinking about a campuswide smoking ban for nearly two
years, now. We find it hard to believe that major
metropolitan areas, such as New York City, where not only the
population is as diverse as it gets, but the hospitality industry is as
dynamic as it gets, can enact a smoking ban with little fanfare, but it
cannot happen here? Council should not rescind its effective date for
its smoking ban. If this fall or next year, the BOH finally approves a
countywide ban that could be facilitated by the city tweaking its law,
that should be negotiable. But in the interim, the city should not be
blowing smoke at its own ban . Smoking ban about health, not rights THE DOMINION POST -- August 25, 2011
Jeff Baron’s letter to the editor about clean indoor air regulations
(DP-Monday) is the same misleading and tired argument the tobacco
industry has been using to rally people to protect their interests for
years. Smoking advocates, whether they are citizens, bar owners or
tobacco lobbyists, are always claiming that going smoke-free is taking
away their rights.
What rights? There is not, never was and never will be a right to smoke
in public places. In our country, nobody has a right to endanger the
health and welfare of others. Smoking bans are no different than laws
against drinking and driving. They protect people from the risky
behavior of others.
When somebody smokes indoors, their cigarette emits toxins that others
in the same room are forced to breathe. These substances have many
immediate and long-term health effects. No one has the right to risk
the health of others for their own gratification. Most smokers are
considerate enough to agree with this.
While the evidence is clear that smoking cigarettes wreaks havoc on the
health of the smoker, killing about half of them, clean air laws are
not aimed at forcing anybody to stop smoking. Advocates of smoke-free
laws just don’t see a reason to allow smokers to take the rest of us
down with them.
So what action should responsible government officials take? Protect
the health of the 80 percent of the population who does not smoke or
fold to pressure from a minority of smokers or those who profit from
the habit? It’s not about rights or economics. It’s about health.
All evidence is firmly on the side of supporting smoking bans.
Smoke-free laws are being successfully enacted in communities
everywhere. Those communities prosper because protecting people’s
health is simply the right thing to do. Catherine Whitworth -- Morgantown
EDITORIAL City, BOH catch smoke: New initiative to enact ban countywide holds promise THE DOMINION POST -- July 31, 2011
It’s
hard to see what a compromise looks like anymore. And it’s even harder
these days to see how we ever get there from here on anything.
But last week when we figured there was little to no hope of a
countywide smoking ban in Monongalia County, someone struck a match
between the Board of Health (BOH) and Morgantown’s city
officials.
Though nothing is for certain, it appears that a comprehensive,
consistent smoking ban for the entire county could be enacted this
fall.
During the BOH’s meeting last week it voted unanimously — 4-0 — to
reconsider a smoking ban in conjunction with Morgantown
officials. What
sparked this initiative was Morgantown City Council’s passage of its
own ban on smoking. That and a lot of give and take by the BOH and city
officials since then. We could leave this at just saying we are encouraged.
But there’s something more to be said for this development and for the
spirit of cooperation that the BOH has adopted and the city has
extended. No smoke and mirrors here.
Not only has the BOH put the countywide smoking ban back on the agenda
— more than three years after it was tabled — but it also named a
liaison panel to work with the city on this issue. And it appears at least one key opponent of a countywide ban in the past lobbied the BOH to try again.
On the city’s side of this issue, it proved it was willing to cooperate
when it extended the effective date of its own smoking ban to give the
BOH apt time to reconsider a ban. Certainly beats someone drawing a line in the sand for, let’s say, next week or else.
There has also been a real interest on City Council’s side of the line
by showing up, along with the city manager, at the BOH’s meeting this
week.
The city manager has also indicated in no uncertain terms he and
council stand ready to make some concessions in the interest of a
countywide ban. No one should be surprised if these negotiations run into differences of opinion between now and this fall. However, it would appear another year-long stalemate on a countywide smoking ban is not going to happen.
It’s ironic that only last week we opined on the Monongalia County
Board of Health. In that instance, we focused on the appointment of
someone to fill a vacant seat on the BOH and its critical role in our
region.
A week later, this board seems to be willing to step up and fulfill its
responsibility to this community’s public health and welfare. Now, if they could just get the White House and Congress in line.
EDITORIAL Careful with appointment: Filling seat on Board of Health deserves county’s full attention THE DOMINION POST -- July 24, 2011
Hurry up and slow down.
That might describe the best way for the Monongalia County Commission
to approach filling the vacant seat on the Board of Health (BOH).
Hurry up because there’s the little issue of a countywide smoking ban
that’s rekindled after Morgantown’s City Council approved a smoking ban
last month.
Slow down because in years past, some appointments to this board have
gone awry, not to mention the responsibilities that come with this
post.
Last week, we reported that the commission has received almost 10
resumes from people interested in filling the empty seat on the
BOH. For now, the BOH is operating with only four members instead of the usual five.
Not only does the BOH oversee the Health Department, which provides for
a host of health services in our county, such as the Women, Infants and
Children program, family planning, an immunization clinic and many
nursing services, it’s also a policy-making board.
The Health Department’s annual budget tops $325,000, making it one of
the largest line items among the county’s expenditures.
And as for policy making — one that was proposed was tabled more than
three years ago by the BOH: A countywide smoking ban in public places.
The effective date of Morgantown’s impending ban was deliberately
delayed until late September to allow the city and anti-smoking
advocates time to spur the BOH to take this issue up before then. But
it’s safe to say that until the vacant seat on the BOH is filled we can
expect little to happen on this initiative.
At the same time, we urge the County Commission to be deliberative,
too, about who it names to fill the vacant seat on the BOH.
In the recent past, there have been several embarrassing appointments
and reappointments we would, at best, describe as misguided, at worst,
wrong.
One consideration we would urge the commission to look at to fill this
seat is whomever it appoints have some background in health
services.
There are also some statutory considerations. The new member needs to
live in the Central or Western magisterial districts of the county
because two board members are already from the Eastern District. State
code bars more than three from the same district. We would also urge the commission to look at more diversity on this board. It would be easy to dismiss this appointment as a matter of course. It’s not.
TO
SUBMIT a resume of your qualifications for the Board of Health, write
to: Monongalia County Commission, 243 High St., Room 202, Morgantown,
WV 26505.
The Benefits of the Smoking Ban
We don't have permission this excellent piece by Sam Wilkinson on The City of Morgantown.com but here's the link.
City should stay vigilant on smoking ordinance THE DOMINION POST -- July 7, 2011
On behalf Breathe Easy Alliance of Morgantown (BEAM), we want to thank
City Council for its unanimous support of clean, smoke free air for
Morgantown workers, residents, students and visitors.
Thanks to council’s leadership, Morgantown will enjoy immediate
benefits in health, economy, aesthetics and quality of life. As
demonstrated in a Kanawha County study and similar studies, we know
that there will be major health benefits to the smoke-free ordinance.
Our city is now eligible to host many conferences (by organizations)
that require smoke-free destinations, including the state Bureau for
Public Health and the federal Centers for Disease Control. Visitors
from other communities will no longer be incredulous that they are
exposed to smoke in indoor public places.
Our students will be able to enjoy a normal college social life without
being saturated with cigarette smoke. All workers will enjoy equal
employment opportunities in safe environments free of secondhand
smoke.
After years of community advocacy that was unheeded by the Monongalia
County Board of Health (BOH), council’s action marks the first
substantial move forward on this important issue in 20 years. BEAM
members intend to partner with business owners and again approach the
BOH to ask them to follow council’s lead and extend protection to
workers in the county.
That is exactly what the BOH did when the City Council passed its first
ordinance in July 1991. The best way to encourage the BOH to act
appropriately now is to make sure that the city ordinance stands. You
can expect challenges to arise from factions who believe they benefit
from tobacco-related interests.
If the opposition follows through on its threats for legal action, be
assured that none of these suits have ever succeeded in West Virginia.
Within days of implementation of the law, some establishment owners may
claim economic catastrophe.
However, data gathered from scores of cities, including those within or
adjacent to cities or counties without smoke-free laws, demonstrate no
sustained economic loss. Once a community has time to experience the
benefits, support for smoke-free laws increases dramatically in the
months following implementation from all segments of the population,
including smokers and bar owners. Regardless of what the BOH does,
Morgantown can and will thrive and benefit from this ordinance, even if
the county does not respond with an equally protective
regulation.
We urge each member of City Council to remain steadfast in your support
and defense of the smoke-free ordinance protecting the health of all
workers and patrons in Morgantown. Chris Roberts & Dave Harshbarger Breathe Easy Alliance of Morgantown
EDITORIAL No reason to keep blowing smoke -- WVU, Mon County Board of Health should follow Morgantown’s example THE DOMINION POST -- June 24, 2011
Only
weeks ago, Morgantown was lit up about an amendment to the city’s clean
air law. We were told that finally, after years — 20 of them — all
public workplaces — including bars and restaurants — in the city were
going smoke-free. Though the proposed draft of the amendment was
presented to City Council about a year ago, it had never appeared on
council’s agenda until May 31. City leaders admitted that amending this
law was long overdue, but a number of more pressing issues took
precedence until recently. We held our breath while urging City Council
to approve this proposal. We are not going to absolve City Council for
not acting on this smoking ban sooner. However, we applaud its
willingness to take action once this issue was put on its agenda. It
didn’t table this proposal, it didn’t appoint a task force and it
didn’t become yes-men and yes-women to special interests. Instead, it
acted upon empirically sound data and policy from the clash of ideas on
council and listening to the concerns of the public. Then it voted —
unanimously — to do the right thing. In three weeks, City Council
resolved the same issue that’s still smoldering on the Monongalia
County Board of Health (BOH), three years after the fact. And what WVU
continues to let burn more than two years after its Student Government
Association voted unanimously for a smoke-free campus. During the
debate at council’s meeting on the smoking ban, it was decided to
extend its effective date from 60 days to 100 days — Sept. 29. The idea
behind that extension is to give council time to work with the BOH on
enacting a similar countywide ban. Many suspect that WVU may also
present a campuswide smoking ban to the university’s Board of Governors
before then, too. Though we are not going to hold our breath again
waiting on the BOH and WVU to act on smoking bans, there’s never been a
better time for them to act. Clearly, what a countywide smoking ban
would do is put all businesses on an equal footing. What a campuswide
ban does is acknowledge the obvious: Institutions of higher learning
should be teaching the best health practices. If WVU and the health
board were taking a wait and see approach to find out how Morgantown’s
council resolved this issue, they have their answer. Now, the burning
question is: Will the BOH and the university continue to blow smoke at
a ban or will they act in the best interests of public health? They
need to give us something to glow about.
Let’s hope county has backbone on smoking THE DOMINION POST -- June 24, 2011
I was overjoyed to read about the decision of the Morgantown City Council to ban smoking within city limits.
Now, we can only hope the Monongalia County Board of Health will find
the backbone to do what it has been charged to do: protect the public
health by initiating a countywide smoking ban. Mike Breiding -- Morgantown
Thanks to City Council for action on smoking THE DOMINION POST -- June 12, 2011
I would like to thank the Morgantown City Council for its recent action
to protect workers, students and patrons from secondhand smoke.
Its considerations during the first reading of the clean air ordinance
on Tuesday is a step toward a healthier city! Bambi Bevill -- Valley Grove
Jacob LubmanSmoking ban necessary step for enhanced public safety THE DAILY ATHENAEUM -- June 7, 2011 This
being my first column for The Daily Athenaeum, I felt it was
appropriate to write about something important – a matter of life and
death. And that is really crux of the issue, isn't it? Secondhand smoke
kills people. It's a fact. Numerous scientific studies have shown it,
and in other parts of the world and the US this issue has been all but
laid to rest by laws prohibiting smoking in public places, limiting
exposure to the deadly fumes. Yet the issue remains. In
Morgantown it is accepted that there are certain places where you are
going to have to suffer through the smoke. But those places are too
numerous and often too important. Right outside buildings on campus?
Those are zones of high traffic, and thus high numbers of people are
affected. That, more than anything, frustrates me about this. How
can someone in good conscience be so willing to endanger other people
just for their own convenience? That is why we have things like speed
limits. They keep those who are reckless from harming themselves, but
most importantly, they are prevented from harming others. So why can't
we move this ban along? These are public places. The Health Sciences
Center ban is a nice start, but how about outside the Life Sciences
Building? Clark Hall? I hated leaving classes just because I knew I was
going to be exposed to the smell and ill-effects of smoke as soon as I
left. The
director of the Center for Disease Control, Thomas Frieden, is coming
to Morgantown next week. This is a chance for us to finally do
something about this ban. He is is also going to meet with the
Monongalia County Health Department. But who here will listen? Those
who run the show in Morgantown have a vested interest in this issue and
– news flash – that interest is not in your health. It's in their
pocketbooks. The
bar owners who have worked so hard to keep this ban from happening are
simply more powerful than those who are fighting to implement it. If it
were just smokers who were against the ban, this would have been passed
a long time ago. Now there is an outside force with much more clout
coming in. Will this be the turning point? It certainly could be.
Or instead of listening to someone with a wealth of experience and a
track record of success, will our local leaders simply thumb their
noses at him, spurning a great opportunity to come to a reasonable
solution? This
issue isn't going away.Everyone has a strong opinion about it, whether
it is because of convenience, their safety or their livelihoods. But
the fact still remains that without this ban, the health of our
population is at risk. And isn't that what's most important? For
parents to know that their children attend a University that cares
about their health and well-being? The University does so well in
offering WELLWVU: The Students' Center of Health and providing police
for our protection. Secondhand smoke is the easiest of fixes, with no
cost at all to the University. Those
who argue that banning smoking is discrimination against smokers should
realize that by not banning it, those who make the wise decision not to
smoke are the ones who are truly being discriminated against. Why
should those who make a good choice still be subjected to the dangers
of others' bad habits? In all parts of my life, I am surrounded by
smoke, yet I've never touched a cigarette in my life. At work, at
school and at play, smoking is a constant presence in my life, and I'm
sure it is the same way for many others. I
don't know if any progress will be made this upcoming week, but I can
only hope that the University and city I love so much can show me they
care for me and the rest of the non-smokers too. There is no one
better suited to making progress on this issue than the director of the
CDC himself – I hope we take advantage of this opportunity and come out
of this a cleaner and safer city and University.
EDITORIAL Council should send smoke signal Morgantown needs to take action on comprehensive clean air proposal THE DOMINION POST -- June 6, 2011
If
only smoking were as simple as playing with fire. But then again, there
are ambiguities about arson, too, in some Morgantown neighborhoods.
Despite the overwhelming decline of smoking over the years, diseases
caused by tobacco use are still the No. 1 preventable cause of death in
the country, according to the Center for Disease Control and
Prevention. And the last time we breathed someone else’s smoke, it
certainly had no known health benefits. Last week, Morgantown’s City
Council discussed a proposal to ban smoking in all bars, restaurants
and workplaces in our community. The city’s current 20-year-old clean
air law is far from comprehensive. Bars are exempt and the provisions
for restaurants are weak. Workplaces, aside from certain public
offices, are also exempt. The Monongalia County Board of Health
followed the city’s lead in 1992 with its own vague countywide clean
indoor air regulation. Both of these regulations, by and large, have
met with ambivalence. That doesn’t mean smoking is prevalent in
restaurants and workplaces. On the contrary, many restaurants have gone
smoke free over the years, as have most workplaces. Yet there are
numerous exceptions, and most establishments offer few protections to
their employees and inadequate measures to safeguard their patrons, who
are all endangered by secondhand smoke. Let’s be clear about the
proposal to ban smoking in public places in Morgantown, because for
many, there are ambiguities about the dangers of smoking. First,
smoking is still legal and cigarettes and other tobacco products are
still a legally sold substance. Even if council passes this law,
smokers still have the right to smoke in their homes, cars and other
private domains. Some will argue this law threatens their individual
rights or their right to operate their business as they see fit. But we
disagree. Although we have the right to bear arms, we cannot walk into
a school with a shotgun. Though we can drink alcohol in a bar, we
cannot walk the streets swigging wine. Everyone and every business
already complies with rules and regulations. Many of those rules and
regulations are all that stand between public safety and chaos. We
believe City Council is well advised to approve this ordinance without
further delay for any number of reasons. But the first and foremost
reason is enough: To protects us all from secondhand smoke. That’s
simple enough.
EDITORIAL It’s time for WVU to clear the air; Clements needs to acknowledge sense of urgency on task force’s recommendations
THE DOMINION POST -- May 20, 2011
In light of all the smoke that’s been blown at this issue, one thing’s
clear: WVU’s president, James Clements, won’t light a match near a
campuswide smoking ban until he’s certain it won’t blow up in his
face. Of course, any such policy change will
need the Board of Governor’s approval, too. But nearly two years after
Clements arrival on campus, this issue is still smoldering in yet
another study. Earlier this month, the task
force Clements appointed 18 months ago to examine WVU’s existing
smoking policy and make recommended changes did so. It recommended that
WVU become smoke free. That recommendation comes more
than two years after the Student Government Association unanimously
voted to prohibit smoking on campus, and about three years after the
Faculty Senate voted to support a countywide ban on smoking — that the
Monongalia County Board of Health continues to blatantly dodge.
Yet, Clements has opted — for now — to study how to put the
recommendations in place. He’s asked legal and administrative experts
to analyze several areas of consideration raised by the report.
We understand that the logistics of transforming WVU’s campuses into
smoke-free zones will entail some planning and work. However, what’s
left to study? What we would like to hear is
that WVU’s president intends to agree to the task force’s primary
recommendation that the university become smoke free.
Expanding cessation programs, fostering a culture of compliance,
exemptions for special events and other circumstances appear to be
secondary, here, at best. What’s needed — now — is
WVU’s president to announce that he will submit a written policy change
to the BOG calling for a campuswide smoking ban. Though the BOG has the last word, this decision falls on Clements. So why has nothing happened?
To his credit, Clements has decided to forego the additional committees
the task force recommended to review this issue and has actually
advanced the process. Yet, our newspaper gets the
impression there is no sense of urgency at WVU on this issue, much like
our county Board of Health’s approach. Students
are especially vulnerable to secondhand smoke. Many work in local bars
and restaurant with few or no smoking safeguards. Not to mention, many
students already have a tendency to disregard long-term health
problems. This is reason enough for a sense of
urgency. Not to mention potential liability issues. Task forces,
studies and advice are fine and well, but do nothing to protect the
thousands of people exposed to widespread secondhand smoke on campus. It’s time Clements cleared the air at WVU. GUEST COMMENTARY BY MARISA LEUZZI The smoker isn’t the only one who’s smoking THE DOMINION POST -- May 8, 2011
As a student at WVU, I am writing to you in regard to the dangers
of secondhand smoke. I feel strongly about the air quality here in
Morgantown as it can be a silent killer to those who are nonsmokers. To
protect the community, Monongalia County should take the initiative to
develop better air quality and establish a healthy environment for all
to enjoy.
For almost 22 years, I have suffered with severe asthma. Asthma
affects more than 20 million adults in the United States and almost 9
million children. Secondhand smoke can trigger asthma episodes and
increase the severity of asthma attacks along with wheezing. It is also
a risk factor for new cases of asthma in preschool-aged children who
have not already exhibited asthma symptoms. Many of the effects of
secondhand smoke, including asthma, are most clearly seen in children
because children are most vulnerable to its effects.
During my childhood, I could not attend birthday parties at
restaurants with my friends because I would always have to leave due to
an asthma attack caused by secondhand smoke. I also could not go out
and enjoy family dinners at a local eatery because even though smoking
and non-smoking sections were established, the air quality is still
poor. Not only did I have to miss out on playing sports and
participating in activities like other children my age were doing, but
I had frequent emergency room trips. According to a study by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2007-’08, approximately
88 million nonsmokers over the age of 3 in the United States were
exposed to secondhand smoke and, of these, 32 million were children and
adolescents (age 3-19). Children’s developing bodies make them more
susceptible to secondhand smoke’s effects and because of their small
size, children breath more rapidly and breath in more secondhand smoke.
Those who receive high doses of the secondhand smoke at the greatest
risk of experiencing damaging health effects such as lung cancer, ear
infections and chronic respiratory illnesses like bronchitis and
pneumonia.
Now as a college student, our social life consists of gathering
with friends and classmates at local bars and restaurants. Not only did
I miss special events in my childhood due to secondhand smoke in
popular places but now I am missing out on memorable events during my
college career. Many organizations and clubs I am involved in have
fundraisers, socials and other similar events at Morgantown bars.
Majority of the time I cannot attend or need to excuse myself to use my
inhaler to just try to stay an extra hour.
I did not ask to be diagnosed with asthma; it was something I was
unfortunately diagnosed with as an infant. After 22 years of having
asthma, I am still not accustomed to it. Growing up with asthma is not
only a struggle for me, but my parents also. I feel as if I missed out
on a lot during my college career due to my asthma. I do not feel like
I have had that experience like other students have had. In the past 3
years at West Virginia University, I’ve had more emergency room visits
for breathing treatments than I ever had during my first 18 years of
life when my asthma was more severe. So, why can’t we help those who
are diagnosed with asthma or other diseases by making their life just a
little bit easier by having cleaner air?
I would hate to see my future children or any children for that matter
miss out on special and memorable childhood events just because of
secondhand smoke. We cannot prevent asthma but we can prevent
secondhand smoke. In Charleston and many other communities, profits
have increased since going smoke-free. I feel as if we can make the
same accomplishments for Morgantown and its’ businesses. The Surgeon
General has concluded that the only way to fully protect nonsmokers
from the dangers of secondhand smoke is a smoke-free environment.
Separating smokers from nonsmokers, cleaning the air, and ventilating
buildings cannot eliminate secondhand smoke exposure. Implementing
smoking restrictions in workplaces, public places, cars and homes is
strongly recommended by medical and public health professionals. Together, we can make a difference to better our air quality and the health of our loved ones.
Why No Smoking Ban Beyond WVU Alumnus THE DOMINION POST -- April 28, 2010 This
weekend I am excited to visit Morgantown for a fraternity formal from
my home near Washington, D.C. As an alumnus I frequently travel back
for basketball games and for the entire football season. I enjoy
shopping on High Street and purchasing West Virginia-made products.
However, there is one area of the Morgantown economy that does not
benefit from my visits — the bar/club community.
As much as I would enjoy going out after a ball game or a nice dinner,
I just cannot take the cigarette smoke. I have read in the news how
nearby Harrison County has struggled to enact a smoking ban because of
the fear of lost restaurant and bar revenues.
While I appreciate the owners’ concerns, I can tell you that they are
based on fear and not facts. I have lived in the Washington metro area
for eight years and have heard all the same excuses in the past.
Despite their claims, after having a D.C. smoking ban for three years
and a Maryland smoking ban for two years, I can tell you that
restaurants and bars have had no longterm negative financial impacts.
I encourage Monongalia County to enact a smoking ban before the start
of this football season. I have spoken with many others who agree they
would spend more time and money in Morgantown’s bars and restaurants if
they could breathe easier.
I also encourage them to contact the governments of Maryland and the
District of Columbia if they wish to have empirical results to prove my
opinion.
In late 2009, the state of Virginia, one of the leaders in tobacco
production and home to Phillip Morris, enacted a smoking ban.
Why Morgantown, Monongalia County and the state of West Virginia delay
implementing something so simple and beneficial to people’s health is
beyond me. Chris Greaver -- Mount Rainier, Md. |
EDITORIAL Light a Fire Under Process: Lengthy Study of Proposed Smoking Ban at WVU’s Health Sciences Center Inane THE DOMINION POST -- April 19, 2010
WVU’s proposed ban on tobacco use at the Health Sciences Center (HSC) is still smoldering.
Although the policy appears to be shrouded in a bureaucratic haze, we
were relieved to see the vast majority of comments posted online
recently were overwhelmingly in favor of the ban.
Despite formal recommendations for a ban from the chancellor of Health
Sciences, nearby bans at WVU Hospitals and University Health
Associates, and support from many employees, this newspaper and a host
of others, this process continues to be on a slow burn.
The HSC campus — which prohibits tobacco use within 50 feet of its
building — was initially set to go tobacco-free in November 2009, but
the ban was unnecessarily put on hold for a campuswide review of WVU’s
smoking policy.
The policy, now under review, prohibits use of tobacco products by
faculty, students and staff at the HSC campus. Period. Disciplinary
action for students and employees who violate the rule, includes
expulsion or termination. People who smoke in a private vehicle on the HSC campus, however, will not be punished. One
change, suggested in the recent public online comments on the policy,
recommended expanding the ban to patients and visitors, too. Other
suggestions were to install more signage about the smoking ban,
clarifying enforcement, setting up an online site to report violations
and banning tobacco use inTHE DOMINION POST -- April 19, 2010 vehicles, too. Though
these recommendations should be incorporated in this policy, we cannot
understand the continued delay by WVU’s Board of Governors to OK a
tobacco ban at the HSC. The policy is set to undergo still another
public comment period, once it’s revised. We
can almost understand the foot-dragging going on with the 11-member
task force gathering information and reviewing WVU’s current smoking
policy to see if it should be modified. That’s
a tall order, when applied to WVU’s entire campus. The task force owes
WVU’s president a progress report at the end of the spring semester. However,
as the issue of smoking applies to health care providers, or anyone
setting foot in the HSC or on its grounds, they are obligated to set
the best example, now. Call us impatient at the pace of this process,
if you will. But we contend that this issue — smoking at the HSC —
should be handled with a sense of urgency. That goes for that task force still at work on campuswide smoking, too. For
many health issues there may be no cure, but early intervention and
aggressive treatment go a long way toward a healthier quality of life. |
EDITORIAL WVU Continues to Grab Smoke: BOG’s Response, Task Force Timeline Snuff Out Hope for Putting Out Issue THE DOMINION POST -- December 17, 2009
Getting a straight answer from WVU can be like trying to grab smoke.
Last week, the university’s health sciences chancellor proposed a
policy to WVU’s Board of Governors that would effectively ban tobacco
use on all Health Sciences property.
For now, smoking is banned throughout the private segment of the Health
Sciences Center, WVU Hospitals, but not within its public segment at
the Health Sciences building.
Oh, smoking is prohibited in the building, its classrooms and within a
50-foot perimeter surrounding the building, demarked by a green line.
But outside the green line, you are safe, uh, allowed to smoke.
In another development, WVU finally appointed a task force to “examine”
the university’s current smoking policy and recommend changes. A status
report is expected next May.
WVU’s nearly 20-year-old smoking policy currently bans smoking in all
university buildings, with exceptions in residence halls, and, of
course, within the green line outside the Health Sciences building.
We could cite facts about lung cancer and a host of dread diseases that
affect smokers and nonsmokers who breathe second-hand smoke.
And then there’s the moral implications why WVU is obligated to set the
pace for good health practices. But after reading that WVU’s
administration and the BOG is going to continue dragging its feet on
updating and expanding its smoking policy, some might ask, “What’s
there to say?”
When the BOG’s chairwoman insists there must be provisions for Health
Sciences employees to take smoke breaks — and the task force may bog
down over boundaries and enforcement issues — we’re not going to hold
our breath on developments. That’s not to say we’ll take a wait and see
attitude, either. We just don’t expect or anticipate much.
However, we’ll continue to rally behind WVU’s chancellor of health
sciences and others, including the Student Government Association, who
want an expanded smoking ban on campus. Because in the end, words, may also go up in smoke, but they also indicate something’s still burning. |
State Does Too Little to Help Smokers Quit THE DOMINION POST -- October 18, 2009 Smoking kills. That statement is said so often now that it’s almost passe, but it shouldn’t be.
The truth of it is strong, and the fact that in West Virginia, we have
more smokers than most other places means people here are dying more
often from smoking-related illnesses. This is especially true for poor,
uninsured and Medicaid populations where smoking is even more
prevalent. West Virginia could be doing so much more to help people
quit smoking.
The American Lung Association (ALA) recently gave our state a failing
grade when it comes to tobacco prevention and spending. ALA’s report
shows that the state’s Medicaid program does not provide coverage for
all the drugs that help people quit smoking and does not provide
coverage for individual counseling. Additionally, there are
restrictions on the coverage that is provided.
Gov. Joe Manchin recently talked about prevention as one of the keys to
reducing Medicaid costs. I applaud these comments and suggest that in
the case of nicotine addiction, providing all of the best possible
treatments to those on Medicaid would reduce long-term costs
significantly.
These treatments are available to those insured under PEIA but not to
those on Medicaid. Smoking is a large contributor to far more expensive
medical conditions, and for that reason, smoking cessation and making
available every method to help people quit should be a priority in West
Virginia.
The idea of helping people quit may not sit well with everyone. After
all, back in the 1960s, half of U.S. adults were smokers. That number
is much lower now — around 20 percent nationally and 28 percent in West
Virginia. A lot of things account for that, but it’s safe to say that a
great number of people who could quit with little or no help have done
so.
Everyone knows smoking is bad for your health; everyone knows it’s
addictive and that people die from a multitude of diseases that are
either caused by or made worse by nicotine use.
Still, we have people who are highly dependent on nicotine and simply
cannot seem to quit. Many of these people exist in a culture where
smoking is still tolerated, and many live their lives with fewer
financial and educational resources than the majority of the
population.
Most smokers have made some attempts at quitting, including “cold
turkey” and nicotine-replacement therapy - to no avail. Because a large
number of these people are on Medicaid, the cost of that continuing
addiction is something we all share.
ALA tells us that more than 400,000 people die each year from
smoking-related illnesses; these are preventable deaths. The Centers
for Disease Prevention and Control and the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services both have recommended guidelines on smoking
cessation that include access to counseling, access to all FDA-approved
medications (prescription and over-thecounter) and reduced or
eliminated co-pays.
So far, West Virginia is not following all of these guidelines for
those on Medicaid — and that’s costing all of us.
Carl Rollynn Sullivan, M.D. Director of Addiction Programs, WVU School of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry |
Group Mourns Passing of a Champion THE DOMINION POST -- October 15, 2009
The members of Smoke Free Mon County, along with scores of
others, mourn the tragic death of Kingwood resident, Ronald H.
Phillips, earlier this month. This Vietnam War veteran, dedicated youth
coach and community servant, who never smoked, died of complications
related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Mr. Phillips was
certain his illness was caused by his exposure to secondhand smoke and
sent us more than 20 pages of correspondence in the past year in
support of smoke-free air.
He was a great source of inspiration and encouragement as we faced
setback after setback in our pursuit of safe air for all. His death is
an enormous loss. We wish to convey our deep appreciation and most
heartfelt sympathy to the Phillips family as they grieve. We’ve lost an
American hero and a wonderful man. Mr. Phillips swore he’d fight for smoke-free air “until he drew his last breath.” Sadly he has.
“I
am dedicated to helping make our public areas and establishments
totally smoke free. It is my hope, that my children and grandchildren
will not suffer the same fate which plagues me today. I can think
of no other gift, which you could give our children and grandchildren,
than to do everything in your power, to provide them with a smoke free
environment.” -- Ronald H. Phillips, February 27, 2009 Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County
|
BOG: Stand Up for Ban on Smoking THE DOMINION POST -- October 4, 2009
LAST SUNDAY, The Dominion Post published a story that left me speechless.
The utterly disappointing headline read, “HSC smoking ban may be
delayed: Needs BOG’s approval; not on Nov. agenda.”
Still hopeful for a positive outcome for Wednesday’s WVU Board of
Governors meeting, I exhaled deeply and told myself not to jump to
conclusions. Then, on Thursday, as I sat in class, my eyes wandered
over to a half crumpled, Sudokuless, student newspaper.
Now, across my palms, I scanned the pages for good news, and
unfortunately, came up empty. In short, the BOG has delayed making a
decision on the smoking ban resolution until next Wednesday, claiming
that the resolution was hastily assembled and not only falls short
logistically, but also does not take into account smokers’ rights. The idea of smokers’ rights leaves me absolutely boggled.
To begin a discussion on rights, we could start with one of the
earliest forms of the concept and its documentation in the United
States. In doing so, we could discuss those that were laid in the
bedrock of our country’s foundation, the “Godgiven” beliefs imbedded
within the text of the Declaration of Independence.
Unfortunately for some, nowhere among the “inalienable rights” listed
in the unequivocally fundamental document of our nation’s history does
it mention smokers’ rights; it supports the opposing argument.
The phrase, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” comes to mind.
For those who claim a smoking ban would impinge on their rights as a
smoker, secondhand smoke can do some impinging, itself. This
scientifically proven damaging force impedes on all three of our
“inalienable rights.” With long-term exposure, secondhand smoke is
capable of stealing a person’s freedom to live a healthy, long, and
cancer-free life.
I’m not trying to dehumanize smokers or make them out to be bad people.
They’re not. And to be honest, it’s sad, because so many people who
smoke, wish they could quit. And yes, of course, smokers have the right
to smoke, too: it’s their body.
But, this whole debate isn’t about prohibition, it’s about health. If
the BOG has the power to protect WVU students, faculty, staff and
campus visitors from unconscious exposure to the harmful chemicals in
secondhand smoke, then why should it be bickering about the topic? If
the BOG can make it easier for social smokers to quit because they no
longer face the ritualistic cigarette outside the doors of their
building, then why are they avoiding a decision? And if the BOG can
help people save people money in future health care costs, and who
knows, even save their lives in the long run, then why does it continue
to make excuses?
I’m not in favor of haphazard and poorly-planned action, but
I’m certainly not in support of unfulfilled promises.
And after all of the input from health experts and university
administrators, the support from community members and partner
institutions, and the press conference that was held in the Alumni
Center to proudly declare Nov. 19 as the official “smoke out” date, all
we have to show for it is a hope that, on Wednesday, the BOG will
finally follow through on its end of the deal.
DANIELLE CLEMENTS is a senior English major at WVU. She can be reached at campuslife@dominionpost.com. |
EDITORIAL An Anniversary We Can’t Forget County Holding Its Breath 40 Years After Passage of National Smoking Act THE DOMINION POST -- August 25, 2009
As 40th anniversaries come and go this year, don’t forget this one.
In 1969, Congress passed the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act. It
banned cigarette advertising on television and radio and required every
pack of cigarettes be labeled: Warning: The Surgeon General Has
Determined That Cigarette Smoking Is Dangerous to Your Health.
A lot has changed since then, but at the very same time, here in
Monongalia County, a lot of things have stayed the same, too. Today,
20 counties, including our neighbors in Marion County, on Aug. 1, and
in nearby Harrison County, have banned smoking in public places.
Neighboring Pennsylvania last year also became the 33rd state to
enact a statewide smoking ban. However, the Monongalia County Board of
Health continues to ignore this issue, despite the dangers of
second-hand smoke.
A clean-air initiative tabled by the BOH in May 2008 hasn’t drawn
its last gasp, but don’t look for any breaths of fresh air from this
board anytime soon.
Yet, we are beginning to get the impression that the BOH may not
be required to do anything to ban smoking in public places.
In recent months, not only have several restaurants and bars gone
smoke free, but the city’s major medical facilities, including
Monongalia General and WVU hospitals, are also pulling the plug on
smoking Nov. 19.
WVU has meanwhile appointed a task force to research and report
on a proposed campus-wide smoking ban that has already won the Student
Government Association’s endorsement. Still, decades
after the surgeon general’s dire warning first appeared on cigarette
packs, smoking in West Virginia continues to be a life-and-death
pursuit.
The state is second only to Kentucky among smoking related deaths
of its residents. Percentages of adults and teens who smoke in West
Virginia are some of the highest in the nation. That’s
why even though the BOH has refused calls to renew the debate on a
smoking ban, we continue to call on it to fulfill its obligation to the
public .
Nothing is being gained by the BOH’s refusal to take up a
proposed smoking ban in public places. If anything, the board’s
credibility is now seriously compromised, if not already up in smoke.
One would assume that the BOH will revisit this proposal before it
becomes an island in a sea of nonsmoking venues, but we’re not going to
hold our breath. Yet, our newspaper is not about to
forget the BOH’s obligation to the public’s health, even though some of
its members apparently have. If it take 40 days and 40 nights or another 40 years, we won’t let this issue go out. |
[Charleston Gazzette] Smoking Editorial Off-target THE CHARLESTON GAZZETTE -- August 17, 2009
As president of the Kanawha Charleston Board of Health, I am
writing in response to the Gazette's editorial stating that the Board
should give preferential treatment to the Tri-State Racetrack &
Gaming Center in Cross Lanes and exempt it from the Clean Indoor Air
Regulation that went into effect July 2008.
I must say that I am surprised, and a little disappointed, at the
Gazette's very narrow and shortsighted responses. I expected more from
a newspaper with a reputation for championing the rights of the people.
Being safe in public establishments is certainly a right that should be
maintained.
As a Board of Health, we take our responsibility to the people of
Kanawha County very seriously. We studied all of the latest and most
thorough scientific research for almost a year and a half before making
the decision to expand Kanawha County's Clean Indoor Air Regulation to
include bars and gambling establishments. We took our lead from the
2006 U.S. Surgeon General's report that stated unequivocally that no
level of secondhand smoke is safe. Exposure has immediate detrimental
effects on the cardiovascular system and causes coronary heart disease
and cancer. Death rates from regular exposure are as much as 30 percent
higher than that of unexposed nonsmokers.
We also studied reports from dozens of other locations that had
enacted 100 percent clean indoor air regulation. Looking at objective
sales indicators, every reliable economic study finds that, in the long
term, sales rebound and, in some cases, exceed sales prior to the
enforcement of the regulation. Going smoke free has even attracted new
business, reduced maintenance expenses, decreased absenteeism and
lowered insurance costs.
While tobacco companies maintain that separate smoking sections, with
ventilation, are adequate, there is no credible data to prove this.
Current scientific knowledge shows that ventilation systems are
incapable of removing all toxic components of secondhand smoke from the
air. We now know, beyond dispute, that secondhand smoke is a carcinogen.
Due to a tough economy, most gambling establishments throughout
the country are showing double-digit losses, including those in Las
Vegas and Atlantic City, which do allow smoking. There is no clear
evidence that the Clean Indoor Air Regulation has caused the loss of
funds for the race track or the city of Nitro. Tri-State does have the
opportunity to market the race track and gaming center to the thousands
of people who like to gamble and breathe clean air at the same time -
something they promised to do when they asked for our votes.
As a Board of Health, we are forced to make unpopular decisions
at times to protect the health and safety of the people that we serve.
We make each decision only after looking carefully at the best
available scientific evidence, whether it involves dealing with the
H1N1 virus, maintaining clean water or making sure restaurants are
following safe food handling practices. Maintaining clean indoor air
also falls within that realm.
In response to the Gazette's cryptic comment that Board of Health
members are allowed to be paid up to $100 for each meeting, that is
true. However, no Kanawha Charleston Board of Health member has ever
taken any money for participating in Board of Health meetings. We
accepted the appointments to the board because we care about Kanawha
County and want it to be a healthy and safe place to live.
Brenda C. Isaac, President Kanawha- Charleston Board of Health. |
EDITORIAL Smoking Out Appointments Decision on Returning Member to Health Board Ill-serves Public THE DOMINION POST -- July 29, 2009
The Monongalia County Commission used smoke and mirrors Wednesday.
But its unanimous reappointment of August Lucci to his third five-year
term on the county’s Board of Health didn’t fool anybody.
One commissioner indicated it was “normal procedure” to reappoint a
board member if he or she previously served “faithfully” and wanted to
continue serving.
Though we are not sure of his definition of “faithfully,” we take it to
mean that board member will toe the line and vote for the status quo.
What’s really disappointing about this appointment to the BOH is that
the County Commission had a viable candidate. What recommends Lucci over the other candidate, who was actually knowledgeable about public health?
This harkens back to the appointment of a local businessman several
years ago over a longtime physician to the BOH, who was far more
qualified to represent the interests of public health.
What do such appointees to a Board of Health have that offsets the
credibility that members of the medical and public health community
have? Especially board members who seemingly don’t see secondhand smoke as a public health hazard.
We cannot help but think that such appointments are based on something
other than who would best serve the public’s health. Political favors,
maybe?
Of course. But more to the point, we suspect it’s the candidate’s
position on efforts to ban smoking in public places. Ironically, we doubt these decisions are reached in smoke-filled rooms, but this issue is all the difference.
But another kind of irony was in the air Wednesday. On the day the
commission reappointed someone to the BOH, who has only served to drag
his feet on a countywide smoking ban, the area’s major health centers
announced plans for a smoking ban inside and outside their facilities
this fall.
It’s conceivable that the issue of smoking in public places might take
care of itself. Such an initiative across WVU’s campus is on the
agenda, while other restaurants and bars are considering like efforts.
The County Commission has not served its constituents well. From here
on, we recommend appointments to any public board provide for term
limits. This would make way for new ideas and take a little bit of the
politics out of these appointments.
Though we don’t see the commission acting on this idea, the issue
of secondhand smoke will continue to smolder. And rather than dying out, we look for it to eventually catch fire. |
Lucci’s Reappointment Not in County’s Interest THE DOMINION POST -- July 29, 2009
If August Lucci is reappointed to the Monongalia County Board of
Health, we can be certain that the public health of residents will
continue to be of low priority while the interests of a small but
well-connected segment of the business community will be protected.
I wish the [Monongalia] County Commission would share with us what
special expertise Lucci contributes that would be valued above that of
someone who has dedicated her career to health and wellness.
Lucci’s motion and voting record has effectively prevented any action
on the most important public health issue in our county, exposure to
secondhand smoke.
His close connections to those who oppose smoke-free air are well
known. While he has been silent on the issue, his actions confirm that
he will place the opinion of bar owners over that of the U.S. surgeon
general, worldwide health authorities and our own county health
officer.
Given Sam Chico’s, and Bob Bell’s [BOH members] strident opposition, if
Lucci is reappointed, the chances of passing an adequate clean indoor
air regulation in Monongalia County within the next several years will
go up in smoke. Catherine Whitworth -- Smoke Free Mon County |
Campus Buzz Clements’ Turn to Tackle Smoking THE DOMINION POST -- July 26, 2009
According to the ANRF, the American Nonsmokers’ Rights
Foundation, there are 305 completely smoke-free colleges and
universities within the United States. In case you haven’t noticed around campus, WVU is not one of them.
Despite this, according to Tobacco Free Mountaineers president Chris
Roberts, a majority of the student population supports a smoke free
campus. Through a survey conducted by the organization, members
discovered 68 percent of students moderately or strongly agree with a
smoking ban. So why has nothing happened? The good news: There has been progress.
This past February, our Student Government Association voted
unanimously to make WVU smoke-free. The bad news is that it’s now out
of the SGA’s and student hands. Now it’s a topic for WVU’s Staff
Council — which, Roberts said, discussed the issue just last week — and
Faculty Senate to decide on.
As for the Faculty Senate, members discussed voting to support a
countywide ban in 2008. In a close 30-32 vote, it was rejected. Nearly
a month later, members called for a revote and, after a revised version
of the original motion was presented, it was approved.
In the end, however, I think the decision falls on the most powerful
voice: the new university president, James Clements.
Despite all of the past discussion, the fact remains that secondhand
smoke is still widespread, and according to the American Cancer
Society, still causes around 3,400 lung cancer deaths in nonsmokers
annually. Add that to the tendency to disregard long-term health
problems, and young people are especially vulnerable.
Catherine Witworth, chair of Smoke Free Mon County, said students face
incredibly “disproportionate exposure” to secondhand smoke because for
many young people, work in bars and restaurants is all they can find.
And if you think about how much time the average student spends in
establishments with indoor smoking each semester, each visit
unknowingly breathing in chemicals such as arsenic, benzene and over 50
others known to cause cancer, the issue becomes more serious and more
urgent.
In a Winter 2000 West Virginia University Alumni Magazine article about
the university’s history by Barbara J. Howe, who was a history
professor in 1923, West Virginia’s State Fire Marshal banned smoking
indoors, including the buildings of WVU.
Five years later, university President and smoker, John Roscoe Turner,
disregarded the ruling, leaving secondhand smoking an untouched issue
until 1990, when the university officially ruled against it.
In light of an inconsistent past of smoking regulations at WVU, as well
as the Monongalia County Health Department’s blatant dodging of the
issue, this fall is Clements’ moment to make things right.
It’s his moment to not only demonstrate that WVU is a progressive,
intelligent and health conscious university but also to prove to
students, faculty members, staff, and the community as a whole, that he
has our best interests in mind.
DANIELLE CLEMENTS is a senior English major at WVU. She can be reached at campuslife@dominionpost.com. |
GUEST EDITORIAL Let FDA police cigarettes; Oversight best option to reduce the number of deaths from tobacco THE DOMINION POST -- June 6, 2009
It took decades of scientific and political battles before
cigarette makers would admit the obvious: Cigarettes kill people.
Warnings about the dangers of smoking are now plain on every pack sold
in America. It took years of brawling in statehouses before tough
antismoking laws exiled smokers to the sidewalks. Now, there’s another
fight — no, another chance — to stop kids from starting this lethal
habit and to help adults quit. The U.S. House has voted overwhelmingly
to allow the federal Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco,
much as it oversees prescription drugs. That’s a smart move. Under the
proposed law, the FDA would gain power to: Force tobacco companies to
disclose the ingredients in their products. Let’s end the guessing game
about what’s in a cigarette. The FDA could decide whether to set caps
on certain chemicals in tobacco, or to change the composition of
cigarettes to make them less dangerous to smokers and people around
them. It could curb nicotine levels. Force tobacco companies to expand the size of warning labels on the package.
Restrict advertising and promotion. Tobacco manufacturers
couldn’t use
misleading terms like ‘‘light,’’
‘‘mild’’ and ‘‘low
tar.’’ Research
suggests that such cigarettes may be even riskier than standard
cigarettes. One theory: People compensate for the lower nicotine level
by inhaling more deeply or smoking more.
Crack down on sales of tobacco to kids. The FDA would work with states
to beef up enforcement and could levy its own fines for retailers who
sell to kids.
Now, the concept of tobacco regulation strikes some people as absurd.
Here’s a product that, when used as directed, kills people. But
prohibition is hardly an option. This country has some experience in
trying that with alcohol. FDA oversight is the best option for reducing the 400,000 deaths each year attributed to tobacco use.
Even Altria, the parent company of industry leader Philip Morris USA,
has embraced this bill, saying such regulation ‘‘would provide some
clear guidelines for products that could potentially reduce the harm
caused by smoking.’’
It has been nine years since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the FDA
had no power to regulate tobacco. So, Senators, pass this bill.
President Barack Obama, a smoker who has struggled to quit, says he’ll
sign it.
Cigarettes will never be safe. But the FDA can make sure smokers know
what they’re getting — and understand the risks.
THIS
EDITORIAL appeared in the Chicago Tribune on Tuesday. This commentary
should be considered another point of view and not necessarily the
opinion or editorial policy of The Dominion Post. |
EDITORIAL Issue Continues to Smolder One Year Later, Smoking Ban Remains Tabled by Health Board THE DOMINION POST -- May 31, 2009 It’s like a Three Stooges’ routine. You know the one, “Slowly I turned ... step by step ... inch by inch ...”
We refer to the reaction to the Monongalia County Board of
Health’s continued refusal to put a countywide smoke-free initiative to
a vote.
And before anyone jumps to conclusions, our reference to the
Stooges is not to the three members of the BOH, who have effectively
blocked a vote on a smoking ban.
Almost to the day, a year ago, the BOH tabled a decision on a
proposed smoking ban, that has been smoldering ever since. Smoldering
in restaurants like The Texas Roadhouse, Boston Beanery’s Suncrest
location and the Varsity Club. Burning on WVU’s campus, where a
proposal has been launched by students to make the campus smoke free.
Almost like a stench that lingers way too long, and eventually
sinks into the fabric of our community, the BOH needs to clear the air
on this issue.
Just like boards of health in 18 counties statewide have. Or like one
of the 33 states with statewide smoking bans have.
These initiatives are not an effort to be trendy. No, the truth is that
second-hand smoke is linked to numerous diseases, including cancer. And by not passing a smoking ban, the BOH has failed to fulfill its mission to protect the public’s health.
It’s not a question of whether this initiative will inconvenience or
upset someone? Or if someone’s profit margin shrinks?
That’s not the issue. The issue is that the public’s health continues
to be put at risk, as a result of the BOH’s inaction. And if someone
wants to argue this issue on a dollars-and-cents level, we suspect that
the drop in health care costs would more than compensate for any losses
elsewhere.
But bad habits don’t die easy. Folks wouldn’t be fighting so hard to
restrict access or to allow it if it didn’t mean something. This fight
will continue in Monongalia County.
The only question is how long it will take to get another crop of
signatures on another petition. And which seat on the BOH will change
next to shift its balance and give this clean indoor-air initiative a
chance.
Despite our disappointment with the BOH’s decision a year ago, this is
still a temporary setback. Eventually, the BOH’s ignorance will be
overcome, by a court, by the state or by referendum, or all three. And
someday we will look back and wonder why this took so long and was so
hard.
Considering where this issue was not that long ago, this is no measure
of the slowness of change. It’s quite the opposite. |
GUEST COMMENTARY Don’t Give Up on the Tobacco Tax — It’s a Matter of Life and Breath THE DOMINION POST -- April 26, 2009 As
the last seconds ticked away on this year’s legislative session, the
House of Delegates approved Senate Bill 414, a bill that if signed into
law by Gov. Joe Manchin will establish a cabinet-level position to
coordinate health care reform efforts in state government.
Up until the passage of this bill, the 2009 legislative session could
have been called a big disappointment. Other key health care bills,
including a tobacco tax increase and calorie labeling on restaurant
menus, were defeated.
While the Legislature failed to pass a tobacco tax, there are those of
us who believe that an increase will inevitably occur whether it’s
later this year or during the 2010 session. Let’s hope that is true.
According to the Coalition for a Tobacco Free Kids, raising West
Virginia’s cigarette tax to the national average would: Keep more than
30,300 kids from ever starting to smoke. Convince 19,800 adult smokers
to quit. Prevent almost 15,000 premature deaths in the future from
smoking. In the long term, save more than $700 million in health care
spending, including almost $175 million in Medicaid spending.
This increase in tobacco tax couldn’t come at a better time. West
Virginia has the second highest smoking rate in the country, with about
2,700 kids becoming daily smokers each year. If we can price kids out
of market by raising the tobacco tax, we will both save lives and
reduce healthcare costs. Few
realize the impact that smokers have on the cost of our health-care
system and the state’s economy. Smoking leads to high rates of cancer,
heart disease and cardiovascular disease. The cost to treat these and
other smokingrelated illnesses cost West Virginia’s health care system
almost $700 million each year. This is why it is so important to
increase the tax, but also to offer smokers every available means of
quitting whether that is through the state Tobacco Quitline, the Public
Employees Insurance Agency or Medicaid.
More than 3,800 West Virginians smoker die each year, and an additional
410 nonsmokers die prematurely from exposure to secondhand smoke. These
deaths exact a heavy toll on families across the state.
While tax increases are generally unpopular, this is not the case with
increasing tobacco taxes. A recent poll conducted by West Virginians’
Campaign for a Healthy Future found that by a two-to-one margin, West
Virginians support raising the cigarette tax from 55 cents to $1.
West Virginia should not accept the status quo. We have the ability to
make significant changes. We should not accept having the second
highest smoking rate in the country with the correspondingly high cost
of health care. We have an opportunity to prevent our youth from ever
starting to smoke. If you do not start smoking by age 20, you are
highly unlikely to ever start. Nor should we accept having high rates
of chronic illnesses like diabetes, lung disease and asthma. It is time
that we should all agree that the status quo is unacceptable and
provide the leadership needed to protect our youth by passing an
increase in tobacco taxes. If not now, when? And if not us, who?
PERRY BRYANT is
executive director of West Virginians for Affordable Health Care. He
lives in Charleston. This commentary should be considered another point
of view and not necessarily the opinion or editorial policy of The
Dominion Post. |
A Member's Letter to the Dominion Post (unpublished)
To the Editor:
It was fine for you to list the smoking ban issue as meriting
being on your "most influential" list since it brings attention to the
issue. Sadly, our Board of Health has continued to do nothing. And as
long as nothing is done, the health of employees who are subjected to
secondhand smoke continues to be at risk. Clearly people who advocate
public health have no influence on those Bored, er, Board of Health
members. I suggest that if you develop a "least influential" list, the
smoking ban proposal should be on that list too.
To add insult to injury the photograph that accompanied the story
was of the Morgantown Mall. This Mall, in December of 1991 begged the
BOH to exempt them from a smoking regulation it was considering. With
no debate the Board opted to permit the Mall to allow smoking in
sections of its facility. We started a trend 17 years ago, when the
1991 regulation went into effect in April 1992. Since then most of our
counties have passed Mon County by enacting stronger regulations. An
example of how far behind we are is this very same Mall, which permits
smoking in a restaurant, the fumes of which emit into the Mall;
furthermore it has no objection to people smoking right by the
entrances. And as far as our BOH is concerned, that is perfectly fine.
Robert Anderson --
Morgantown
If
you've got a letter supporting the smoking ban, don't wait for the
Dominion Post to publish it. We know a lot of excellent letters go
unpublished, so send it to support@smokefreemonc.org and we'll consider posting it here. |
EDITORIAL House Bill 2932 A Smoking Gun Measure To Give Politicians
Final OK On Restrictions Should Be Snuffed THE DOMINION POST -- March 23, 2009
Little about this legislative session has been
extraordinary. If anything, it’s been consumed by shifting revenue estimates and
the recession — issues a little drier and gloomier than most. However, at the
same time, there’s been no shortage of nonsense bills, either.
Everything from the Barbie bill to proposals for pay raises for public
employees, not to mention drug testing of welfare recipients. As a
result, it has not always been easy this year to discern measures that are
actually serious about balancing the budget from those that are a waste of time
as this legislative session winds down. But one bill that caught our
attention recently actually poses a threat. That legislation, House Bill 2932,
injects the poison of politics into public health. And not surprisingly, the
bill comes from our own region — the delegation that represents most of Marion
County and slivers of Monongalia County. What this bill would do is
require county commissions to approve any public health department restrictions
on smoking in public or private venues. The sponsors, including Delegate Mike
Caputo, D-Marion, insist that it is not about overturning smoking bans or
limiting their restrictions. Instead, Caputo says the legislation would
bring ‘‘transparency’’ to the policy-making process of public county health
boards. His reference is pointed at the Marion County public smoking ban passed
in March 2008, with little public notice, which we took exception to here, in
April 2008. However, what’s odd is that this bill applies only to
smoking regulations — not any other health regulations or rules those boards
might enact. And despite the mistakes made in Marion County’s example, this is a
wrong trying to make things right. This is also bad public
policy-making, since boards of health were designed specifically to be beyond
the reach of politics. The idea is to prevent situations where a
politician could overrule health inspectors closing a restaurant for violations
because the owner is a friend of the commissioner. Or a debate could ensue to
deal with an outbreak of botulism. But
what’s almost surreal about this bill is that county commissioners appoint the
members on local boards of health. That usually suffices most political whims.
At first blush it would appear that what HB 2932 wants to do is allow county
commissions to make sure its appointees get it right. No one’s naive enough
to believe that politics don’t intrude in every aspect of public life.
However, if there’s anywhere that politics should be set aside, it’s in
matters of public health and safety. Balancing interests we understand, but
putting the public at risk to appease anyone’s family, friends or constituents
is politics at its worst. Maybe that’s why this legislative session seems so
normal.
|
GUEST COMMENTARY Light Up Tobacco Tax Timely Medicine for State’s Health and its Economy
THE DOMINION POST -- March 22, 2009
Imagine you had the power to save 14,800 West Virginians from premature
death, improve the health of 5,000 babies, keep 30,300 young people
from becoming addicted to a dangerous drug, and save taxpayers millions
of dollars. Gov. Joe Manchin and the Legislature have exactly that
opportunity by passing Senate Bill 420/House Bill 2746, which hikes the
cigarette tax by 65 cents per pack.
West Virginia ranks worst of all states in the use of tobacco. We have
one of the highest rates of smoking among teens and pregnant women —
two populations especially vulnerable to the bad effects of smoking.
Tobacco use is the major cause of preventable disease, disability and
death. High rates of cancer, heart disease, and poor birth outcomes are
all attributed to smoking.
Hardly a family in West Virginia has not experienced the tragic effects
of tobacco. My father, a heavy smoker, was diagnosed with lung cancer
at age 48 and died 18 years later. After losing one lung, he never
again worked a regular job and became increasingly disabled as the
years went by. Like so many men of his generation, he started smoking
as a teenager in the Army and was not able to shake the habit until
cancer claimed a lung.
Opinion polls across the state and nation show strong public support
for tobacco tax increases to deter this behavior. According to research
by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, these polls note broad support
across demographic and partisan lines. To balance state budgets,
citizens favor cigarette-tax increases to other tax increases or to
budget cuts. They also believe that at least a portion of the tobacco
tax revenues should be used for programs to prevent and reduce smoking,
especially among youth.
Yet the tobacco tax bills are languishing in the Legislature.
Leadership on the issue is coming from Sen. Roman Prezioso, D-Marion,
and Delegate Don Perdue, D-Wayne, who chair the health committees in
their respective chambers. Last year they championed the creation of a
special committee to study the problems of health and health care in
West Virginia. They engaged hundreds of citizens to develop
recommendations for change. The single most important recommendation to
come out of that process was to increase the tax on cigarettes and
smokeless tobacco products.
In presenting the recommendations to their committees, Prezioso and
Perdue spoke passionately about the harm that cigarette smoking wreaks
upon the state’s citizens. Nothing is more urgent, Prezioso said, than
protecting the health of our children. Nothing will do more to reduce
the cost of health care than to address the plague of tobacco
addiction. It’s no surprise that the two physicians in the Senate, Dr.
Ron Stollings, D-Boone, and Dr. Dan Foster, D-Kanawha, are cosponsors
of the tobacco tax bill. Delegate Barbara Hatfield, DKanawha, a nurse,
is co-sponsoring the bill in the House.
Education and smoking cessation programs help reduce tobacco use, but
nothing has been more effective in curbing use than high excise taxes.
Numerous studies have documented that cigarette price increases lead to
significant reductions in smoking among smokers and to fewer new
smokers. The research suggests that a 10 percent increase in the real
price of cigarettes can be expected to reduce cigarette consumption by
2 percent to 5 percent for adults. Among young people, a 10 percent
increase is expected to decrease consumption by 6 percent or more.
Since 2002, 44 states and U.S. territories have increased their
cigarette tax rates. Currently, 27 states have a cigarette tax rate of
$1 per pack or higher. Thirteen states have tax rates at $2 per pack or
more. The proposed increase in West Virginia’s cigarette tax would
raise the tax to $1.20 per pack, the national average. The state Tax
Department estimates that the tax increase would bring in an additional
$110 million in state revenues.
There are legitimate concerns that tobacco and other “sin” taxes are
regressive, imposing a disproportionate burden on lower-income people.
To reduce this unfairness, most of the tobacco tax revenues should be
dedicated to public programs that benefit those people and their
families. For example, using the revenues to match federal dollars for
Medicaid would provide $440 million for health care for the uninsured,
extending coverage to another 70,000 West Virginians.
The governor has a lot of clout, and he can be very persuasive when he
wants to get something done. So, what is he waiting for? Members of the
Senate and House should all be clamoring to add their voice in favor of
a measure that would do so much to improve the health and economy of
West Virginia.
RENATE PORE is
a health policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget &
Policy, based in Charleston. This commentary should be considered
another point of view and not necessarily the opinion or editorial
policy of The Dominion Post |
State Must Be Vigilant in Fight Against Tobacco THE DOMINION POST -- February 26, 2009 The
grades are out and the state of West Virginia is failing to protect
public health from the dangers of tobacco. Recently, the state received
an “F” for every category (excise tax, smoke free air, prevention and
cessation spending and cessation coverage) in the American Lung
Association’s State of Tobacco Control 2008 report.
Adult smoking rates in the state increased from 25.7 percent in 2006 to
26.9 percent in 2007, and high school smoking rates jumped from 25.3
percent in 2005 to 27.6 percent in 2007. While much of the nation has
seen their smoking rates drop, ours has increased.
Many good programs are happening in West Virginia such as Freedom From
Smoking, Not On Tobacco, Teens Against Tobacco Use and RAZE, but we
need to do more. Tobacco is the No. 1 preventable cause of death in our
state, killing 3,900 people every year, and costing our state $690
million annually in health care costs. We can no longer ignore this
substantial financial drain.
This must be the year that West Virginia leaders finally pass policies
that not only protect our children from a lifetime of tobacco addiction
but also reduce the crushing burden that tobacco use places on our
healthcare system and economy.
The American Lung Association in West Virginia will continue to
advocate for cleaner air and more stringent tobacco control and
prevention programs in 2009. Now is the time to improve the health of
all citizens here and pass strong tobacco control policies. Tim Higgins -- Charleston American Lung Association |
CAMPUS BUZZ Will Ciggy Bans Go Up in Smoke?
THE DOMINION POST -- February 15, 2009
Last week, members of the WVU Student Government Association
voted to endorse a resolution that would make the campus completely
smoke free.
WVU’s current smoking policy — enacted in 1990 — prohibits smoking in
campus buildings and university-owned vehicles, but allows faculty,
staff, students and visitors to smoke outdoors and in residence halls,
with permission.
To date, 260 college campuses have gone smoke free, according to
Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, a group that lobbies for smoke-free
policies.
Before WVU’s resolution can take effect, interim WVU President C. Peter
Magrath must review it and decide what measures should be taken. Things
to consider are whether to designate smoking zones and how to establish
campus boundaries.
Monongalia County doesn’t have a good record for enacting smoking
policies. In May, the Monongalia County Board of Health indefinitely
tabled a ban on indoor smoking in public spaces and workplaces,
including restaurants and bars — a measure the WVU Faculty Senate,
after two tries, voted to support.
I’ll make a prediction: WVU will take its grand old time passing SGA’s
policy, just as the countywide one was tabled before.
Why, you ask? Simply due to the fact that city and university officials
are generally afraid of the backlash. In fact, they’ll avoid it at all
costs — even at the cost of the public’s health.
We all know the dangers of secondhand smoke, and in spite of what many
choose to think, it is a problem on WVU’s campus.
On any day of the week, students are met with a cloud of smoke at the
second-floor entrance of Armstrong Hall, on the platforms of PRT
stations and at the front doors of the Mountainlair.
A five-minute walk to class becomes a smoke break when stuck behind
someone lighting up on the sidewalk. Still, there’s nothing that gets
the public more riled up than the idea of banning smoking in any way.
And that is exactly what officials have to fear. Secondly, coming up with a policy that is fair is sometimes just too much hard work.
I suggest that the city and university toughen up and put in the hours
to create policies that protect the public.
Maybe WVU doesn’t need a total smoking ban. But laying the groundwork
for an effective policy that includes designated smoking areas, visible
campus boundaries and punishment for violators, is a step in the right
direction. As for the backlash, take it with a grain of salt.
I assure you that, in spite of what many think, the writers of the U.S.
Constitution never meant for the public to have the liberty of lighting
up a three-inch weapon of mass destruction.
KAREN SNYDER is a senior journalism student at WVU. She can be reached at campuslife@dominionpost.com. |
EDITORIAL Students Not Ones to Butt Out; SGA Proposal on Smoke-free Campus Deserves Consideration by WVU THE DOMINION POST -- February 11, 2009
Smoking is one of the leading causes of some grim statistics, and also continuing controversy.
Although the Monongalia County Board of Health (BOH) was once
considering a ban in all public buildings, that proposal was tabled
indefinitely last May.
However, WVU’s Student Government Association (SGA) last week put
the issue of secondhand smoke back on the table. The SGA unanimously
adopted a resolution, with one abstention, to develop a smoke-free
campus policy. Currently, WVU’s policy on smoking — developed in 1990 —
bans smoking in campus buildings and vehicles, but provides for it
outdoors and in dorms.
The smoking resolution is now on WVU interim President C. Peter
Magrath’s desk for consideration after it undergoes further
deliberation with senior officials. Although Magrath may eventually
leave this resolution for his successor to act on, we applaud the SGA
for taking the initiative on this issue.
It’s encouraging when a student organization gets involved in
something that makes a real difference in people’s lives and their
health. The SGA is on the right track by taking this issue seriously
and by urging change through the proper channels, which will allow for
a review.
Obviously, some will question whether there should be designated
smoking areas outside, how campus boundaries are defined, the impact on
events at the Coliseum and Mountaineer Field, and on residences halls
and fraternities as well. At the same time, others will interject that
the research on secondhand smoke since 1990 is conclusive and no
provision should be made for smoking on campus.
We are on the record for supporting a ban on smoking in all
public buildings and workplaces in Monongalia County and believe the
BOH should revisit this issue at once.
However, for now, we defer to Magrath and his administration on
the SGA resolution on smoking. But, we encourage further debate across
WVU’s campus, including in the Faculty Senate, on how to best address
secondhand smoke.
Unlike the BOH’s response to issues of secondhand smoke,
WVU’s leaders need to keep this initiative on the agenda.
We suspect that the SGA’s resolution will undergo some changes
when, and if, any new policy is formulated, but we urge WVU not to
simply blow smoke at this subject, as Monongalia County’s BOH has
decided to do.
It will be interesting to see what, if any, provisions WVU
includes in its response to this resolution and how quickly they are
implemented.
But what’s even more engaging here is that students are not
simply willing to accept what is, but are asking questions. |
WVU Has Good Reasons to Go Smoke Free Soon THE DOMINION POST -- February 11, 2009
Smoke Free Mon County would like to express our support for the
smoke-free campus resolution passed by the WVU Student Government
Association on Feb. 4. There are abundant reasons to implement a
smoke-free campus policy.
A smoke-free campus supports health and improves the quality of life
for students, employees and visitors by reducing their exposure to the
health hazard of secondhand smoke.
Additionally, a smoke-free campus helps prevent young adults from
initiating tobacco use. The vast majority of freshmen are tobacco free
when they arrive on campus. However, far too many students begin
smoking when they are exposed on a daily basis at WVU. Allowing smoking
on campus reinforces the notion that smoking is a socially acceptable,
sanctioned behavior.
A healthy campus environment translates into increased student success
as well as cost savings for the university from reduced maintenance and
employee health care costs.
A smoke-free campus policy will remove the clouds of smoke that
students, staff, patients and visitors breathe each time they enter or
leave a building. Students with asthma will no longer have to risk
their health to attend classes. Respiratory patients will no longer be
forced to inhale cigarette smoke to attend their medical appointments.
And Mountaineer fans will not have to be subjected to smoke in order to
purchase refreshments at Mountaineer Field.
Secondhand smoke isn’t merely a nuisance. The U.S. surgeon general
confirms that the health of nonsmokers is adversely affected by the
smoke of others. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand
smoke.
WVU is the flagship institution for the state in research, health care
and education. It should continue to lead by setting the gold standard
in providing a healthy, smoke-free campus. WVU can make a difference in
promoting healthy lifestyles by going smoke free campuswide.
We applaud Tobacco Free Mountaineers and the SGA for their desire and
initiative to assure clean air for all who come to WVU. And we urge WVU
to join the 260 or more colleges and universities that have adopted
smoke-free campus policies. Catherine Whitworth -- Smoke Free Mon County |
Magrath Can Lead Us Toward Healthier Future THE DOMINION POST -- February 10, 2009
I would like to thank WVU President C. Peter Magrath for the
experience I had while attending WVU for my graduate studies in public
health. It has come to my attention that on Feb. 4, a resolution was
unanimously passed by the Student Government Association to implement a
campus-wide smoking bad.
While enrolled in WVU’s School of Medicine, students were expected to
direct their educational pathways and conclusions based on scientific,
peer-reviewed literature. As I’m sure Magrath is aware, the adverse
health effects associated with smoking are widely published across a
vast amount of literature. When the time comes for him to choose to
agree or disagree with the decisions made by those select students, who
represent the student body, I hope he arrives at a conclusion based on
scientific, published facts. The state of West Virginia typically falls
on the “butt” end of many health issues. I challenge Magrath to
“ignite” this state and university in a step forward to a healthier
future.
Wesley Howard -- Morgantown |
EDITORIAL Why WVU Should Go Smoke Free THE DAILY ATHENAEUM -- February 9, 2008
This week, the president’s office will review a proposal from the
Student Government Association to implement a campus-wide smoking ban. The current smoking policy has not been changed since 1990.
Smoking is not allowed indoors, and individual deans decide where
students can smoke outside of their respective buildings. The proposed ban would not permit smoking anywhere on campus, indoors or outside doors.
A campus-wide smoking ban is the measure most consistent with our
school’s reputation as the leading college in the state for health
research and history of innovative policies. But even if a ban is not enacted, the current policy is outdated and needs to be revised.
Some will criticize a full ban as a restriction of personal rights, or
the singling out of one of many environmental carcinogens. Individual freedoms should not impose on the rights of others to live a healthy life. Secondhand smoke is being singled out because it is a carcinogen people cannot choose to avoid.
A ban is substantiated if there is adequate research legitimizing a
need, students and staff are behind it, and it fits with West Virginia
University’s mission.
In the last 19 years, Americans have learned more and more about
the health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke.
According to a 2006 report by Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona,
nonsmokers are 25 to 30 percent more likely to develop heart disease
and 20 to 30 percent more likely to develop lung cancer if exposed to
cigarette smoke at home or work. “The scientific evidence is now
indisputable: Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious
health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children
and nonsmoking adults,” Carmona said.
The report concluded that “nonsmokers need protection through the
restriction of smoking in public places and workplaces.”
The report was “an analysis of the best research on
second-hand smoke,” according to The Washington Post.
The Tobacco Free Mountaineers found support for a ban among students
they surveyed. In a poll of 500 students, 68 percent moderately or
strongly agreed with a campus-wide ban, according to The Daily
Athenaeum. In this poll, 80 percent of those surveyed were nonsmokers. The American College Health Assessment is a survey of students nationwide.
In the 2004 assessment, 79 percent of students considered themselves
nonsmokers (never smoked or had not smoked within the last 30 days).
So the Tobacco Free Mountaineers’ survey is not biased to include a
disproportionate number of nonsmokers, especially since West Virginia’s
smoking rates are higher than other states. According to the
American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation, 260 college campuses are now
entirely smoke-free, both indoor and out. In West Virginia, only the West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine made this list.
In West Virginia, Bethany College, Davis and Elkins College, Fairmont
State College, Glenville State College, Marshall University and
Mountain State University have smoke-free residential housing policies. If WVU wants to remain competitive, it can’t afford to fall behind. The current policy is also inconsistent with the University’s goals.
WVU’s Prevention Research Center conducts studies to benefit the
people of Appalachia by reducing health disparities.
Researchers at the PRC worked with the American Lung Association and
West Virginia Department of Education to develop Not-on-Tobacco, a
successful, nationally-known youth smoking cessation program. WVU
is also home to the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, “West Virginia’s
most comprehensive cancer treatment, research and education facility,”
according to the Web site. The Translational Tobacco Reduction
Research Program is a collaboration of both centers and conducts
research on tobacco prevention and control. The dangers of
secondhand smoke are no longer in question. With student and faculty
support and our University’s prominent place in health and tobacco
research, the logical next step is for the campus to go completely
smoke-free.
Erin Beck, Columnist |
EDITORIAL An Air of Failure about County; American Lung Association Report Cites Weak Smoking Regulation THE DOMINION POST -- January 26, 2008 When
an association dedicated to breathing gives your air a failing grade,
you might want take a deep breath and think about it and your lungs. Or
not, as the Monongalia County Board of Health has done for more than a
year now. Recently, the American Lung Association gave our county an F
as part of its State of Tobacco Control report. It’s true we weren’t
the only county to flunk, we were one of eight out of 55 to be precise.
But the reason we failed is more disconcerting — our weak
clean-indoor-air regulation. As one ALA leader put it, Mon County
received an F because its regulation is inadequate in protecting all
county residents from secondhand smoke. This week the Board of Health
will meet. We are not aware of any efforts to revive a proposed
countywide smoking ban that was tabled in May 2008. Though we doubt
being flunked by the American Lung Association made an impression on
our Board of Health, it should have. Despite the arguments for a total
smoking ban in all public places, this remains a health issue, not a
business decision. But if anyone thinks the BOH can continue on in its
business-as-usual fashion, we remind them that the test of time is on a
reinvigorated clean-indoor-air act’s side. |
Kudos to Harrison for Approving Smoking Ban THE DOMINION POST -- January 17, 2009
Kudos to Harrison County for enacting its countywide smoking ban.
Harrison County is now the 19th county in West Virginia to have such a
ban in place. Tobacco use is the No. 1 preventable cause of death in
America. Tobacco-related diseases such as lung cancer and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease kill more than 392,000 Americans each
year, and another 50,000 die from exposure to secondhand smoke, yet our
Monongalia Health Department refuses to vote on such a ban.
“Let’s just table the issue and hope it goes away” seems to be the way
the Monongalia Health Department has chosen to deal with this issue.
Monongalia County is a progressive and prosperous county in so many
ways, yet when it comes to protecting the health of the citizens of
this county the Health Department refuses to discuss or vote on a ban
on tobacco smoke in public places. Daniel L Crawford -- Morgantown
Shortly
after this letter was published, the Harrison County Board of Health
caved to pressure by bar and video lottery interests and suspended
their new regulation. The Harrison BOH acted in the best health
interests of their county, but unfortunately did not have the courage
to see it through. -- SmokeFreeMonC.org |
Board of Health Needs to Live Up to its Name THE DOMINION POST -- December 3, 2008
Your
editorial on the Monongalia County Board of Health’s (DP-Dec. 10)
continuous stall was on the mark. For well over a year the Board of
Health has had an opportunity to live up to the very mission it is
supposed to follow — protect public health. Smokefree Mon County, along
with other concerned citizens have been asking them to pass a
comprehensive smoking ban, but, to no avail.
You wrote that it took nine consecutive days to get BOH President Sam
Chico to reply to your inquiry about what the Board was going to do.
And in his reply he seems to be saying he is willing to participate in
a “discussion.” I do not know what that means, but clearly, if he was
ready to support a smoking ban he might not have been so vague.
It looks like there are three solid votes against a comprehensive ban.
Anything short of that fails to protect people from secondhand smoke.
Nineteen counties in our state enjoy such a ban. Yet the Monongalia
County Board of Health seems to think it has the right to thumb its
nose at the U.S. surgeon general, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center’s
director, Dr. Scot Remick, and the Department of Community Medicine
Chair (and occupational health expert) Dr. Alan Ducatman — all of whom
have made a strong case that secondhand smoke is a major health hazard
that people need protection from.
I agree with your conclusion, “Thank you. You’ve had your time.” We
need a Board of Health that is not Bored of Health. Robert Anderson -- Morgantown |
EDITORIAL Time to Light Up Board of Health Tabled Smoking Ban is a Leftover Best Served at First 2009 Meeting THE DOMINION POST -- December 11, 2008 The Monongalia County Board of Health appears to be blowing smoke at the clean indoor air initiative.
Since the BOH tabled a vote on the proposal in May it has remained in
limbo. The comprehensive ban was first introduced as a model proposal
in November 2007. It would bar smoking in all public places and
workplaces.
The BOH appeared to take the matter seriously earlier this year. It
held a lengthy public comment period and heard extensive testimony from
top health experts, while similar smoking bans in nearby Harrison and
Marion counties passed.
At the November meeting, the BOH heard from WVU students, who echoed
the sentiments of previous speakers when they asked the board “to stand
up for the rights of non-smokers.”
And, although efforts to ignite a fire under the BOH to address this
proposal have flared up and died out during the past year, at no time
has the smoking ban been put to a vote. Worse, trying to pin down the board on its intentions concerning the ban is much like, well, trying to grab smoke.
Late last month, for example, we contacted the BOH for an update on its
smoking ban plans. After no immediate response, we inquired again, and
again, and again, and again, and again — for nine consecutive days
(except for Thanksgiving Day) only to receive the following
statement:
“The Board of Health recognizes the community interest in the clean
indoor air act/smoking ban. As you [The Dominion Post] have noted the
board has tabled the issue. However, the Board recognized during the
last Board meeting that the atmosphere surrounding the topic was
improving and was pleased with the way the public portion of the
meeting had gone.” The first part of that response is
a simple recognition of the obvious, but it is the second portion that
makes us pause. BOH President Sam Chico III said he was pleased with
how students presented themselves in the November meeting.
Consequently, he said, he is “willing to participate again” in
discussion of the ban. In September, he shared the opposite opinion
about smoking ban advocate Catherine Whitworth when she addressed the
board during the public portion.
Chico said he felt as though he was driving a vehicle needing
repair and that Whitworth’s “pit crew” was coming at him (instead of
the vehicle) with a “blow torch and sledgehammer.” He went on to say
that he won’t participate in discussion of the matter until the “pit
crew” finds new tools to use. When Whitworth asked for a clarification
of his comments, Chico’s response was: “Thank you. You’ve had your
time.” We urge the BOH to put a proposed smoking ban on its agenda and
vote on it at the Jan. 29 meeting. And, we urge the public to attend
the meeting and speak out one way or the other. If the Monongalia
County Board of Health doesn’t finally handle this matter, we suggest
that the public’s message to the board echo that of its president: “Thank you. You’ve had your time.” |
Isn’t It Board’s Duty to Protect Citizens’ Health? THE DOMINION POST -- December 3, 2008
On
Nov. 13, I went to the Monongalia County Board of Health meeting. After
completion of the obligatory beginning duties, the audience was
dismissed because the board skipped to the executive session. When
everyone was allowed to return, smoke-free information was presented.
But no further action was taken.
In 1964 people knew little of the dangers of smoking. We have come a
long way from the days of smokefilled conference rooms, airplanes and
even schools. Today we know all too well the health impact of using
tobacco products not only to the smoker, but also to the people around
the smoker. Second-hand smoke is the third leading cause of preventable
death in the United States. It is the culprit behind 38,000 deaths
every year, including 3,000 lung cancer deaths among otherwise healthy
nonsmokers. Secondhand smoke contains more than 4,000 substances
including more than 40 carcinogens.
Why must the Board of Health continue to ignore these health issues?
Having a smoke-free community benefits all. In fact, many cities,
including Charleston, have reported an increase in profits in
restaurants and bars following smoke-free passage. Why not Morgantown?
Since the start of smoke-free communities, it has become clear that
concerns about the business costs of smoke-free policies are unfounded.
The facts are that smoke-free laws are good for businesses: They’re
good for the people who frequent them, and they’re good for the people
who work in them. Research published in leading scientific journals has
consistently and conclusively shown that smoke-free laws have no
adverse effects on the hospitality industry and, in fact, can actually
be good for business.
It must be taken into consideration that while restaurant and bar
patrons can choose in which places they spend their time, workers do
not have the same choice. No one should have to choose between a job
and good health.
Second-hand smoke is the reason why today there are more than 1,600
smoke-free communities. I am proud that my community is among those
working on smoke-free initiatives that will save and protect our
health. It is time that the Monongalia County Board of Health members
stepped up and did something to protect the health of the residents in
our community. Isn’t that their duty? Gerri Angoli -- Morgantown Four-time cancer survivor |
Hospitals Congratulated for Stance on Smoking THE DOMINION POST -- November 25, 2008
On Nov. 20, WVU Hospitals East adopted a tobacco-free campus
policy for its Berkeley and Jefferson County hospitals. Hats off to
them!
They have joined a large and growing group of hospitals that have
eliminated tobacco use on their property. This is an important step in
protecting hospital staff and patients from the harmful effects of
secondhand smoke and in speeding the recovery of hospital patients.
Hospitals that allow smoking are sending the wrong message. What sense
does it make to force respiratory patients to walk through a cloud of
tobacco smoke to attend their treatment appointments?
Surgical outcomes are worse and recovery periods are longer for tobacco
users. Tobacco use slows wound healing and increases the rate of wound
infections. Chemotherapy is less effective and treatment costs are
higher for patients who use tobacco, whether or not the illness is
tobacco related. The Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention Partnership
and Smoke Free Mon County extend our appreciation and congratulations
to WVUH-East and all West Virginia hospitals that show their commitment
to patient and employee health by going tobacco free.
Catherine Whitworth Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention Partnership & Smoke Free Mon County
|
Secondhand Smoke Not Healthy for Women, Girls THE DOMINION POST -- October 30, 2008
October
has been set aside to increase breast cancer education and awareness in
the community. One in eight, think of that, one in eight women will be
diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in her lifetime. The statistics
can be discouraging. Family history, race, age and genetics are risks
that women can’t change to alter the odds of having breast cancer.
But women can lower their risk of breast cancer by changing risk
factors that can be changed. This includes limiting alcohol use,
maintaining a healthy weight, exercising regularly and opting to
breast-feed their infants.
The role of cigarette smoking in causing breast cancer is being
researched. Certainly the hundreds of chemical compounds in cigarette
smoke have already been labeled as poisonous or carcinogenic and are
linked to causing lung cancer and heart disease. But there is new
evidence that links secondhand smoke exposure to a 90 percent increase
in breast cancer risk, especially in premenopausal nonsmokers.
The most dangerous period of risk seems to be from the adolescent years
until the age of first pregnancy when breast tissue matures. Secondhand
smoke exposure during this time can cause genetic alterations in the
breast tissue when it is the most sensitive.
Where do non-smoking women get exposed to smoke? Three major
environments were identified in the studies. They included childhood
exposure to secondhand smoke from parents, adult exposure in the home
and adult occupational or workplace exposure.
If there wasn’t reason enough to avoid smoking around your children,
protecting your daughters from breast cancer is one more. Smokers that
light up in the home are adding another risk for mothers, wives,
sisters and daughters that are already facing tough statistics.
The great majority of the staff in the hospitality industry is made up
of young females. Certainly they deserve the same smoke-free work
environment as their peers in other occupations.
If you are a smoker, when you see groups of women or girls, remember
the odds: One in eight will be diagnosed with breast cancer and by
refraining from smoking around them you are giving an immeasurable gift
to their future wellness. Elizabeth H. Hess, M.D. -- Clarksburg | EDITORIAL
Smoking Ban Still a Burning Issue Local
Board of Health Needs to Heed Public Opinion, Facts
THE DOMINION POST -- September 28, 2008
Our
newspaper’s lead headline in Thursday’s edition could have
easily read “BOH snuffs out public opinion.” That
would have at least reflected the sentiments or efforts of Monongalia
County Board of Health’s chairman, Sam Chico, on further public
discussion of a clean indoor air proposal. Despite
the BOH’s inaction on a proposed smoking ban by omitting it from its
agenda, this issue is not about to go away. The Board of Health can
quote our newspaper on that, if it likes. And
it’s apparent from the public comment period at Thursday’s meeting that
the BOH can also quote the public on that, too. At least when it
decides to let the public actually speak its mind. When the
board meets again in November, the issue of a smoking ban will have
been before it for one year. In that time not only have Marion and
Harrison counties’ boards of health passed clean indoor smoking bans,
but our neighbors in Pennsylvania became the 33rd state with some sort
of statewide smoking ban.
Although the BOH’s chairman blew smoke at another board member’s
comments about Washington, D.C.’s, smoke-free regulation, it stands to
reason if a city more than 10 times larger than Morgantown can live
with such a ban, so can our county.
And our nation’s capital, is just one example. Other examples include
cities like Chicago, New York, Philadelphia; towns like Columbia, Mo.;
states like Washington, California, Florida and Delaware; nations like
Italy, Ireland and Spain. Oh, and did we mention 20 counties in West Virginia now prohibit smoking in all public places, including bars?
You get the idea — but the the BOH doesn’t. Admittedly, these smoking
bans are not all created equal. Exemptions abound in some, while others
are strictly interpreted.
But all were a direct result of indisputable facts and findings that
secondhand smoke is linked to numerous diseases, including cancer. Some areas also approved the bans as a way to cut healthcare costs.
Although at least three board members appear to be prepared to
obfuscate and obstruct all efforts to approve a smoking ban in
Monongalia County, we urge the other two to carry on efforts to pass a
countywide smoking ban.
Especially the newest board member, Robert Wheeler, who we expect to be
among those making sure this issue doesn’t fade away. Second-hand smoke
is a public health issue, not a business issue.
The Board of Health needs to do the right thing. Delay is said to be
the worst form of denial, but in this case it borders on dangerous. |
Board of Health Needs to Act on the Facts THE DOMINION POST -- September 21, 2008
Recent published articles on West Virginia’s health goals
(DPSept. 1) and declining life expectancy for West Virginians (DP-Sept.
5), support Smoke Free Mon County’s position that the Monongalia County
Board of Health must step up to protect our county residents from
tobaccorelated disease.
West Virginia’s Healthy People 2010 Plan was developed by public health
officials, individuals, organizations and private businesses across the
state. It is consistent with federal goals and guidelines. One
objective of the plan is “to increase the number of counties covered by
CIA [Clean Indoor Air regulations] and to increase the strength and
breadth for those with existing regulations.” The plan recognizes that improving the health status of a state requires the work of many.
Government agencies, doctors, teachers, social organizations and
private employers are all identified as necessary partners. And we have
strong support from all of these!
Unfortunately, according to the West Virginia Code and the state
Supreme Court, the duty to pass regulations to eliminate public smoking
rests squarely with local boards of health. The BOH’s decision to table
an indoor smoking ban or to consider denying protection to those who
work in the hospitality industry flies in the face of scientific proof
that secondhand smoke is deadly.
Despite federal and state health goals and objectives, they do not act.
We are surrounded by counties whose boards have decided to protect the
health of their citizens by enacting 100 percent regulations, but our
board continues to drag its feet. Why?
BOH members are holding their personal opinions about health policy in
higher regard than the U.S. surgeon general, doctors, researchers and
the collaborative efforts of an entire state. The citizens and workers
of Monongalia County are the victims.
The health status and life expectancy of West Virginians is among the
worst in the nation. We are not willing to allow Monongalia County to
become the worst in West Virginia. Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
GUEST COMMENTARY Singing The Praises of Smoke-free THE DOMINION POST -- September 14, 2008
Many letters have been written regarding the proposed ban on smoking in
bars and gaming establishments. I would like to address a health issue
that has not been mentioned: that of the link between environmental
tobacco smoke and allergies. I would like to relate a personal
experience illustrating the ill effects of ETS upon allergy sufferers.
Last Saturday I received some garments that had been altered in an
establishment where smoking is permitted. My clothing stunk. I tried to
air out my garments to remove the stench, to no avail. On Sunday I wore
one of the aromatic dresses to church, a bad idea. Within 15 minutes of
putting the dress on, my eyes were watering, and my throat was sore. I
did more coughing than hymn singing that morning. Since my service role
in the church is that of congregational hymn leader, I was not happy.
This incident brought back some unpleasant memories of a time in my
life when exposure to ETS forced me to alter my educational and career
plans. When I entered college, faculty and students were permitted to
smoke in offices and in classrooms. The stench of tobacco permeated all
of the buildings in which I took classes, even the school of music
where I took voice lessons. Several of my professors lectured while
smoking. Consequently, I began to have severe problems with my throat
and sinuses. I had entered college with a plan to major in French and
in voice. I was a talented mezzo-soprano, with dreams of becoming an
opera singer. Those dreams had been fostered by music teachers in high
school, and by a close friend of my parents who had been an opera
singer in her youth. And, I was my mother's favorite singer. But,
involuntary exposure to tobacco ruined
my dreams. In my sophomore year of college, I was forced to change my
major to French/ English. I even had to drop out of my church choir.
There was to be no more singing for me, for a very, very long time. For
many years, even as I achieved academic honors in college and soldiered
on in my "Plan B" career, I was heartbroken.
Many years later, in my 50s, I was able to regain my ability to sing.
In a truly miraculous turn of events, I am now able to sing better at
age 61 than I did at age 17, and better than I had ever dreamed
possible as a young girl. I now use my talent to the fullest in the
service of God at Suncrest United Methodist Church. But, I missed out
on almost 40 years of using the talent that God gave me, all because I
was exposed to poison. I was a captive audience in a respiratory sewer
— my college classrooms.
Employees of bars and gaming establishments are also a captive
audience. They must endure the smoke in order to make a living. Rather
than looking at these employees in the abstract, let us personalize the
scenario. There are two college students in my church congregation with
exceptional vocal ability. When Eric and Kallie sing, in the words of
one congregant, "They give Linda a run for her money." I want these two
young folks, whom I hold in high regard, to glory in the gifts that God
gave them. Let us hypothesize that one of them took a job in a
smoking-permitted workplace to pay for tuition. Let us also add allergy
and/or asthma to the mix. Should Eric or Kallie be forced to endure the
same heartbreak that I felt when a gift bestowed upon me by my Creator
was smothered — almost permanently — by human behavior? I think not.
For the sake of their fellow human beings, I am asking the Monongalia
County Board of Health to honor their mandate as guardians of the
public's health, and ban environmental tobacco smoke from all
workplaces in this county.
LINDA A. LILLY
is
an administrative assistant at WVU's Department of Community Medicine.
She lives in Morgantown. This commentary should be considered another
point of view and not necessarily the opinion or editorial policy of
The Dominion Post. |
Mon Health Board Can Take a Cue From Around the State THE DOMINION POST -- August 30, 2008
Despite vocal opposition from bar and video lottery owners, three
members of the Harrison County Board of Health have shown great
leadership in passing an exemption-free smoking ban that protects all
of its workers, residents and visitors. We applaud these BOH members
who were willing to fulfill their duties as public health officials
despite the unpopularity of the regulation with a minority of the
population.
Similarly, we have great respect for the Kanawha and Marion county
boards of health for their refusal to cave to pressure from those who
want to intimidate them into rescinding their regulation just weeks
after implementation. They refuse to ignore their sworn duty to prevent
disease and protect health despite personal threats and strong-arm
tactics by those who believe they profit from unrestricted smoking in
public areas.
No one can credibly assert that the clean indoor air regulation was the
sole cause of summer revenue drops for video lottery establishments.
Gambling and bar profits are down nationwide, quite possibly due to
reduced disposable income brought about by recent inflation. Bar owners
can protest, threaten and attempt to sue, but health board members can
rest assured that the W.Va. State Code and the W.Va. Supreme Court
firmly support their authority and obligation to protect the public
from the health ravages of secondhand smoke exposure.
Smoke Free Mon County has not backed away from its support of a smoking
ban in our county. Smoking in a public place is a serious health hazard
— period.
No amount of exposure is safe. This should be the only consideration by
a county board of health and should never have been a point of debate.
Twenty of West Virginia’s local boards of health agree and have had the
integrity to carry out their obligation to protect all of the public
even when it angered a small but vocal segment of the population.
Why are our Monongalia County public officials deliberately delaying
action and settling to lag behind so many rural and metro counties
while our workers and patrons continue to be exposed to poisonous air?
Smoke-free air for Monongalia County is on hold only because three
members of the Board of Health lack either the sincere desire or the
courage to act. This may be a philosophical debate or a political
dilemma for others, but for appointed public health officials, it is
their sworn duty to protect the public’s health.
Sam Chico, county board of health chairman, says the board will address
the issue of smoke free air “when the time comes.” That time is now.
The 80 percent nonsmoking majority knows that it is well past time for
our board of health to do its job. The majority will not back down from
its demand for a simple and fair clean indoor regulation that provides
protection for everyone.
The board meets again in September. Will they rise to the occasion and
restore Monongalia County’s status as a leader in public health policy,
or find yet another excuse to delay performing its duty to the citizens
they are appointed to protect? Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
EDITORIAL One Habit Teens Can Live Without: Cessation Initiatives Focused at Youth Not Just Blowing Smoke THE DOMINION POST -- August 18, 2008
How many times do adults have to be told our job is to set
healthy standards — not compete with our kids for whose are lowest?
For
instance, the smoking rate for adults in West Virginia is higher than
it is among high school students, according to the state Division of
Smoking Prevention. Some might think, “praise be,” while others might ask, “what kind of example is that?”
Truth be told, the difference in the numbers of adults and high
school students smoking is negligible — 1.4 percent. That’s all that
separates the 26.7 percent of adults and 25.3 percent of teens who
smoke in West Virginia. Obviously,
many, if not most, of these high schoolers are not even old enough to
legally smoke. And the vast majority of the others we cannot help but
regret are already smoking. Other data on teen smoking — relative to
West Virginia — is just as discouraging, including low tobacco taxes,
weak cleanindoor laws, etc. However,
we are encouraged by programs like Not On Tobacco — a nationally,
school-based smoking cessation program created by an assistant
professor at WVU and a local physician, who is the director of the
Prevention Research Center at WVU.
But even more enlightening may be the research another WVU
faculty member is undertaking with the data collected from the NOT
program. That
research is being funded by a $146,500 grant from the National Cancer
Institute and another $100,000 grant from the Maine Center for Disease
Control and Prevention. What these professors hope to discover in the
course of their work is why some teens are more successful than others
at quitting and what factors into the difficulties other teens
experience when trying to quit. The
grant from the agency in Maine will be used to facilitate the expansion
of the NOT program, which has already won federal accolades.
One consideration these WVU faculty members already have on their
short list is creating an Internet-based program that lets teens access
NOT from home. Good plan — no one is more comfortable with the Internet
than high school students. Our
newspaper stands squarely behind initiatives that prevent, dissuade and
end smoking among teenagers. Smoking cessation programs for teens
should be our focus for many reasons, including the likelihood they
will have a far better success rate than adults, simply because adults
have smoked longer. We
cannot afford to sit by silently and let the worst examples set the
standard for the rest of us. This means speaking up for clean indoor
air laws and supporting programs like NOT. Being a teenager does not grant you immortality. What it does give you is a fresh start in life. And life is way too cool to ruin with smoking.
|
Time for Bell, Kennedy to Do the Right Thing THE DOMINION POST -- August 15, 2008
Why hasn’t the County Commission filled the vacancy on the
Monongalia County Board of Health? The county commissioners have an
unprecedented number of qualified applicants from which to choose. Commissioner John Pyles is to be applauded for his efforts to fill the BOH vacancy.
Each of his four attempts to appoint someone to serve on the BOH has
died due to a lack of action from commissioners Asel Kennedy and Bob
Bell.
It is clear county commissioners Bell and Kennedy are not interested in
appointing a member to the BOH who is well informed on the dangers of
secondhand smoke exposure. Nor do they want to appoint someone to the
Board who is interested in banning smoking in public places.
Could it be possible these commissioners are searching for someone with
a health background who would agree to ignore the clean indoor-air
recommendations of the U.S. Surgeon General — our nation’s highest
health authority? The scientific evidence is overwhelming:
Secondhand smoke causes disease; even brief contact with secondhand
smoke adversely affects our cardiovascular and respiratory systems.
Smoke-free environments are the only way to effectively protect people
from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke in indoor spaces. No level
of exposure is safe.
Eliminating secondhand smoke in public places would have a tremendous,
positive impact on the public’s health and would save countless dollars
in health-care costs locally.
It is time our county commissioners fill the vacancy on the BOH with a
person who will not shy away from protecting everyone from the dangers
of secondhand smoke, regardless of their age or where they work. Cecil Pollard -- Morgantown |
GUEST COMMENTARY BOH Cannot Afford to Make a Mistake THE DOMINION POST -- July 27, 2008
At the Monongalia County Board of Health’s May meeting, after
more than six months of discussion, the issue of smoke free air was
again tabled. Thursday will bring yet another opportunity to either
take action or to continue to stall. Some members of the BOH may be
sincerely attempting to draft a clean indoorair regulation that
protects some of the public, yet also accommodates the wishes of
business owners to choose whether to allow smoking in their
establishments. If this is true, please consider the following when
crafting the regulation.
Secondhand smoke is toxic to everyone, both adults and children,
whether or not they choose to be exposed. Yes, many other things are
bad for people. But the topic at hand and under the purview of BOH is
secondhand smoke.
Young people, though legal adults, do not generally put their long-term
health first when seeking employment or participating in the normal
social activities of college life. Informed officials must sometimes
make decisions that are in their best interest (like requiring vaccines
to enter college).
Exemptions often bring legal challenges, as they are ambiguous and
difficult to write in a way that achieves the intended result. Providing an exemption for some businesses fails to create a level competitive field. Exemptions create inconsistencies that make enforcement problematic.
Exemptions create problems for adjoining businesses. It is nearly
impossible to prevent cigarette smoke from entering adjacent buildings
and shared entryways.
If accommodations such as “smoking rooms” are permitted that require
costly construction, it will be very difficult to later strengthen the
regulation once businesses make the investment. Such accommodations are not only ineffective, but are unfair to business owners who can’t afford them. Exemptions leave workers and patrons completely unprotected in the very places where the problem is the worst.
Public health policy must not be written to support and promote
addiction to a substance that ravages health and places an enormous
economic burden on society. This does not serve the public good in any
fashion especially when 80 percent of our county residents do not
smoke.
While initial resistance by a segment of the business community can be
expected, the community will adjust and the BOH will be able to rest
assured that it took a courageous stand and did the right thing for the
health of the community it serves. You are aware that community health
statistics dramatically improve and that smoking rates decline after
comprehensive public smoking bans are implemented. With absolutely no
public health grounds for exemptions, a uniform regulation is clearly
the best way to protect citizens and workers.
The decision to take the only action that will adequately protect the
community remains in the BOH’s hands. No one wants to continually
revisit this contentious issue. If this is indeed the only health
decision the Board of Health will make, I urge it to not make a
mistake.
Catherine Whitworth -- Morgantown Co-chair of Smoke Free Mon County |
Ventilation systems only remove odor, not risks THE DOMINION POST -- July 30, 2008
Regarding the letter to the editor (DP-July 24) on having
restaurants install ventilation systems as an alternative to going 100
percent smoke-free: It certainly sounds like a good solution.
Unfortunately, ventilation systems only serve to eliminate the odor of
cigarette smoke. There is no ventilation system that can get rid of the
particles and gasses emitted by cigarettes that contribute to cancers
and other diseases. Some research suggests that ventilation systems can
even make the secondhand smoke problems worse by circulating poisoned
air from areas of a building that allow smoking to other areas of a
building that may be smokefree. These poisons released into the air include arsenic, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
Even if we were only trying to eliminate the odor of cigarette smoke,
ventilation systems are expensive. Not all business owners can afford
to replace/update these systems.
Businesses that are 100 percent smoke-free need not worry about
installing new and expensive systems that do nothing to protect the
health of their employees or customers.
I sincerely hope the Monongalia County Board of Health sees fit to make
an informed decision, based on scientifically valid evidence rather
than a decision based on the unfounded fears and/or addictions. All employees deserve a safe working environment and business owners deserve a level playing field. Angela M. Lacey -- Morgantown |
Air Filtration Systems Not a Workable Solution THE DOMINION POST -- July 26, 2008
John P. Kuehn’s suggestion that air filtration could solve the
smoking ban controversy is well intended (DP-July 24). If only it were
that easy!
Unfortunately, even the best filtration systems cannot remove all the
toxins that smoking releases into the air. Filters make the air less
offensive and give people a false sense of security; but according to
the U.S. surgeon general, cleaning the air and ventilating buildings
cannot eliminate exposure.
Even the manufacturers of ventilation systems admit that their products
do not eliminate health risks associated with secondhand smoke. Of the
many disclaimers I have seen, one manufacturer says it best: No air
cleaner can protect against the harmful effects of secondhand tobacco
smoke. Clean air begins with a smoke-free environment.
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Cooling agrees.
Their published report concludes that the only means of effectively
eliminating health risks associated with indoor exposure is to ban
smoking activity. No other engineering approaches have been
demonstrated or should be relied on to control health risks from
exposure.
Thank you, Mr. Kuehn, for proposing a possible solution to this
dilemma. I wish more people were giving serious thought to this serious
problem. However, medical experts and ventilation experts agree, the
only way to ensure safety is to ban indoor smoking. Alex Lubman -- Morgantown |
BOH has the Authority to Enact Clean Air Laws THE DOMINION POST -- July 7, 2008
The state Ethics Commission has issued a “dismissal order” on a
conflict of interest of three of the [Monongalia County] Board of
Health members. This is good news as it now clears the path for the BOH
to vote on the proposed clean indoor air regulations. One of the
“powers and duties” of the BOH, according to state Code (Chapter 16
article 2-11.(ii)) is “environmental health protection including the
promoting and maintaining of clean and safe air.” It is the BOH’s
directive to enforce public policy. It was expressed by members of the
BOH that the conflict of interest complaint was a roadblock to voting.
Since this perceived roadblock has been removed, it’s time for the BOH
to vote.
Voting for clean indoor air is not new to state law. According to the
state Supreme Court (214 W.Va. 818, 591 S.E.2d 744 dated 2003): “It is
clear from the face of the statute that local boards of health have
been granted express responsibility for promoting and maintaining ...
clean and safe air which may include adoption and promulgation of rules
consistent with state public health laws and the rules of the state
department of health and human resources that are necessary and proper
for the protection of the general health of the service area and the
prevention of the introduction, propagation and spread of disease.”
In addition the court states “Clean indoor air regulations of local
boards of health that place restrictions on smoking in enclosed public
places (1) are consistent with the findings of the Legislature that
smoking may cause lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema and other
serious health problems, (2) advance the legislatively prescribed
public policy to provide the state with a citizenry free from the use
of tobacco, and (3) fall with the bounds of authority granted by the
Legislature to such boards.”
With regards to the BOH’s consideration on exempting certain
establishments that serve liquor because they are “private” not public
places, the Supreme Court further ruled clean indoor air shall be
applied to all businesses the public may enter. West Virginia Code
60-7-2 (1967) Repl.Vol.2000) (214 W.Va. 818, 591 S.E.2d 744 dated
2003): “We note, however, that, notwithstanding their designation as
‘private’ clubs, these establishment are subject to regular inspections
for other purposes deemed necessary for the safety and health of the
public, such as inspections for the cleanliness of kitchens and the
proper handling of food sold on the premises or compliance with fire
code requirements. Thus, we find no constitutional or legislative bar
to such establishments being subject to the provision of smoking
regulations, or any other type of health or safety regulation, solely
because they are licensed to sell alcoholic beverages.”
The BOH has the power and duty to enact clean indoor air regulations.
Any argument contrary has been before the state Supreme Court. The BOH
also has the responsibility to enact a comprehensive indoor smoking
ban. It is past time for the BOH to put the issue to rest by assuming
leadership, ending the delays and passing a smoke-free regulation that
can be fairly applied and will provide protection to all. Dave Harshbarger -- Morgantown |
BOH Should Approve Ban on Smoking Immediately THE DOMINION POST -- June 21, 2008
The seemingly endless debate concerning the smoking ban has begun
to defy all logic. The task of the [Monongalia County] Board of Health
is to protect public health. It is not economic impact or development.
The question before the board seems to be a simple one: does secondhand
smoke in public areas negatively affect the health of nonsmokers?
Any reputable peer reviewed study of this question always answers yes.
Given the overwhelming amount of data to support the adverse affects of
secondhand smoke, how can the board vote for anything other than a
stringent ban on all smoking in public places, including establishments
that serve alcohol? The board is negligent in their responsibility by not implementing a smoking ban.
Much of the debate has turned to who is on the board and what
connections they have. It seems to be a common theme in West Virginia
that those serving in public office often have “connections” that at
the very least lend themselves to perceptions of a conflict of
interest.
The Monongalia County BOH is not immune from this West Virginia virus.
Like it or not, in the eye of the public, perceptions are reality.
To avoid even the perception of a conflict of interest, responsible
public officials with certain “connections” should remove themselves
from any vote that creates exceptionally loud discourse.
The deafening volume of the smoking ban debate should force the BOH
members to honestly and ethically review how they are perceived in the
public eye.
The BOH should make every effort to protect the public health. They
should approve the ban as soon as possible. Any economic impact or
development issues should be left to other politicians. Chris Nichols -- Morgantown |
It’s No Wonder BOH’s Ethics Under Suspicion THE DOMINION POST -- June 12, 2008
Some members of the community have raised questions about Smoke
Free Mon County’s ethics complaint against three members of the
Monongalia County Board of Health. BOH Chair Sam Chico has said that
this action resulted in a delay in passing a new clean indoor-air
regulation. Three members of the BOH have made it clear they are not in
favor of passing a simple, fair, smoke-free regulation that protects
everyone. They maintain this position even in the face of overwhelming
evidence that secondhand smoke is a public health hazard. Their actions
and comments indicate that they favor exempting the very places where
the most secondhand smoke exposure occurs. When our
BOH members ignore worldwide health authorities and pander to the
business interests of their friends and relatives, they should not be
surprised to have their motives questioned and to be accused of
unethical behavior. When the BOH’s chairman ignores that body’s
by-laws, he should expect to be called to task. When
one county commissioner who participates in making appointments to the
Board of Health also sits on the Board of Health, he should expect
people to question his motives. Meanwhile, incredibly, a second county
commissioner states that the BOH’s role “is not a health thing” and
that the board requires “people who are more business-minded.” He too,
should expect to be subject to public scrutiny. BOH by-laws require the
board to protect and promote public health. With three businessmen
serving, there is more than enough business interest representation on
the BOH. Chico scolded Smoke Free Mon County for
questioning the board’s ethics. Yet he refuses to address our complaint
in accordance with the board’s own bylaws. The BOH has been asked to
address the issue of secondhand smoke at every meeting since April
2007. Smoke Free Mon County presented the board with a model regulation
in November 2007. In March 2008, after having had the regulation in
their possession for months, it appeared most members had not even read
the document. As long as they continue to ignore the facts and shirk
their duty, Smoke Free Mon County and a growing segment of Monongalia
County’s population will continue to question their motives, their
ethics and their ability to lead our community. Ask
yourself: What motivates these men? It is clearly not the health of our
community that guides their decisions. It is time for the majority of
residents who want to see this regulation passed to call them out. The
phone number for the local health department is 598-5100. Give them a
piece of your mind. While you are voicing your
concerns, contact the County Commission at 291-7257 or attend its next
meeting and let them know you want a qualified candidate appointed to
the BOH; one who will promote public health.
Catherine Whitworth Valerie Frey-McClung Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown
|
Monongalia County Health Officer Urged BOH to Approve Smokefree Regulation (Smoke Free Mon County obtained this letter by Freedom of Information request)
Dear Board Members:
I am writing this letter to inform you of my support for the proposed smoking ban which you as a Board will be voting on March 27, 2008. I strongly encourage the Board to vote for the ban as proposed.
There is a great amount of evidence supporting the dangers of
second band smoke exposure. It is our obligation as the Public
Health Department to protect all of our citizens from the dangers of
any health risks. The main argument against this ban is the
infringement on a person's liberties. However, in any case where
a health risk has been imposed on an individual those liberties are
lost. The job of the Health Department is to investigate those
health risks and do what is mandated by our state code to protect the
person. Many nations, states, and countries have recognized and
implemented total smoking bans in public places. A
public place is an establishment, which the public is invited to come
into. We currently are allowing our citizens to be exposed to toxins if
they want to bowl, gamble, eat out, or have a drink at the local
bar. All these establishments are required by law to serve safe
food, drink and air. If the Health Department were called in to one of
these places to investigate a faulty heater which was putting out a
toxic substance, we would certainly be expected to act on it and force
the business to fix the problem. Toxic air due to smoking is no
different than due to a faulty heater. The
argument that it is a person's choice to enter or not to enter into any
of these establishments does not hold up either. If that were the case,
that argument can be used against any environmental health
exposure. If a person lives near, works near, travels by, or
entertains himself near a toxic substance, the comparable solution to
reduce his/her health risk would be to move, change jobs, take another
route, or go somewhere else to entertain himself. I hope the
public health solution would be to clean up the toxic substance. On
March 27th, I strongly encourage the Board to choose the public health
solution, which is to clean up the toxic substance and not to expect
the public to go somewhere else to breathe clean air. Please vote aye
for the proposed smoking ban. Keep Monongalia County at the cutting
edge of public health in our state.
Sincerely,
Vincent P. Kolanko, M.D. Monongalia County Health Officer
|
Vote of ‘No Confidence’ in Our Board of Health THE DOMINION POST -- June 4, 2008
I think it is terrible the way the [Monongalia County] Board of
Health is continuing to delay taking action to protect public indoor
air.
I am sure the Board doesn’t have lengthy debates about the business
consequences of requiring a clean kitchen, so why such angst over
regulating clean air?
The Board’s inaction makes me think that the recent questions about
conflicts of interest of some board members are probably valid. Can the
citizens of Monongalia County vote “no confidence” in this Board? Karen Fitzpatrick, MD -- Morgantown |
Put Public Service Before Self Interest THE DOMINION POST -- June 3, 2008
It is well past time for the Board of Health to pass a
comprehensive clean indoor air regulation in Monongalia County. The
harmful effects of environmental tobacco smoke are clear and well
known.
Local boards of health sometimes face difficult decisions because of
perceived conflicts between the rights of individuals and the health of
communities. In this instance, the Board seems to be extensively
influenced by a small group of employers who contend that their rights
to allow smoking in their business places are of higher priority and of
greater significance than are those of the public’s right to a
environment free of cigarette smoke.
Principles of fair and ethical policy decision making strongly dictate
that those who have conflicts of interest on a policy issue should
refrain from taking part in, and voting on, that issue. Consistently,
members of the Board who have fiscal conflicts of interest should
abstain from all deliberation regarding the proposed smoking ban.
Ironically, there is no scientific evidence that clean indoor-air
legislation has negative consequences on businesses. Even if it did,
that should not be a concern of a county board of health.
It is both mind-boggling and infuriating that our local Board sees fit
to delay action, withhold information, and respond as it has to a
county smoking ban. It is time for the Board to act with courage and
not cowardice, public service rather than self interest, and health
protection rather than disease promotion.
Geri Dino, Ph.D. Director Prevention Research Center -- Morgantown |
Shame on BOH for Delay of Vote on Smoking Plan THE DOMINION POST -- June 3, 2008
The actions of the Monongalia County Board of Health are appalling.
Board members Robert Bell, Sam Chico and August Lucci have succeeded in
delaying the vote on the issue of indoor smoking beyond the tenure of a
board member who was in support of the clean air ordinance.
Now, with supporter Dorcas Davis gone from the board, these members
will be free to abstain from voting on the measure without having to
worry that an effective clean indoor-air ordinance will pass.
These three board members’ business and political interests have gotten
in the way of their duty, and are an example of the corrupt small town
politics that are responsible for maintaining the miserable health
status of West Virginia compared to the rest of the nation.
That said, congratulations and thanks are in order for Davis and other
individuals who have taken on roles of public service in sincerity. It
seems that here in Monongalia County such sincerity is hard to find. Jared Pomeroy -- Morgantown |
Defending Our Health May Require Restricting Rights THE DOMINION POST -- June 1, 2008
Michael Bridges of Cheat Lake is firmly in favor of his right
(DPWednesday), and that of anyone else, to smoke. I have no quarrel
with that.
I don’t know whether Christina Mickey, to whom Bridges addresses his
letter, objects to his smoking in his own home.
Having had to stop smoking a pipe decades ago, because of cancer
indications — and having lost relatives on both sides of my family to
cancer — and having had cancer surgery myself last year, I am as firmly
opposed to having to breathe someone else’s smoke as Bridges is to
anyone’s regulating his smoking.
I don’t know anyone who gleefully rubs his or her hands together at the
prospect of reducing somebody’s pleasure; the point is that I object
when someone else’s pleasure endangers my health.
When I’m walking in the country, I object to the noise of ATVs
impinging on the quiet, but ATV legislation is based on safety more
than on one person’s pleasure becoming another person’s nuisance. I
myself play Highland Scottish bagpipes, and I have been lucky so far in
not finding myself with neighbors who object. But people usually either
love or hate the sound of bagpipes; if Bridges lived above me and
objected to the sound, I would be obliged to find someplace else to
practice.
Likewise, I would regret his or anyone else’s smoking near my home, but
I wouldn’t try to regulate their behavior in their own home. If laws
are eventually passed that regulate people’s right to smoke outside
their homes, I will breathe easier and won’t be obliged to hold my
breath every time I pass a smoker on the street. Since I am a musician
and sometimes play in bars, I can’t do much about the fact that I
sometimes come home stinking of cigarettes merely because I’ve spent a
few hours not far from smokers.
Alcohol, exhaust fumes, fatty foods all have their lovers and their
detractors. I am not trying to deny anyone’s right to indulge in them
when they can do so without threatening the lives and health of anyone
else.
If I were to be forced to stay home because a drunk driver might hit
me, to travel only to certain smoke-free places because I might
encounter a smoker who cherishes his or her right to smoke as much as I
do my right to breathe, I would feel as discriminated against as
Bridges does himself.
Speaking unofficially for others whose health is impaired, we are not
trying to abridge anyone else’s rights.
But if defending our own lives and health impinges on those rights, we
can’t help feeling that collateral damage in the form of some
restriction of rights as unavoidable when we are doing what we can to
retain our lives. Daniel Musick -- Morgantown
|
What’s Next to Protect the Public’s Health? THE DOMINION POST -- May 29, 2008
If you own or operate a bar or video lottery business in
Monongalia County, you are probably happy with the Monongalia County
Board of Health. The rest of us are shaking our heads in disbelief.
Many of us want to know why our BOH is dodging its duty, which is to
protect public health.
The board’s obligation is not simply to protect children, or patrons
and employees of whitecollar businesses. Their charge is to protect the
health of everyone. State law requires that local boards of health
maintain clean and safe air. Clean indoor air is not optional.
Standards for local boards of health are posted on the secretary of
state’s Web site. According to these public health rules: “The board
shall provide ... a safe and healthy environment, and maintenance of
clean and safe air ... through a program of routine public health
environmental education and control.”
The BOH has the facts. They can’t claim ignorance. It’s time board
members explain why they are refusing to protect everyone from
secondhand smoke. Why are bar and video lottery owners dictating public
health in Monongalia County?
Our public health rules and laws about clean air have been upheld by
the state Supreme Court. Perhaps it is time for a legal challenge. Is
that what it will take to get our BOH to act? Cecil Pollard -- Morgantown |
Bell Should Not Vote at Thursday’s Meeting THE DOMINION POST -- May 28, 2008
At the special meeting of the Board of Health in April to discuss
the smoking regulation, [Monongalia] County Commissioner Bob Bell’s
rather hostile questions and statements tells me that he does not
understand nor care about public health.
He seems much more concerned with the opinions of a few bar owners than
the needs of the public. They [the public] elected him to his post —
not a bar owner who has contributed to his campaign.
Bell should resign his seat on the Board of Health. Since he isn’t
about to do that, at the very least, he should not vote at this
Thursday’s meeting on the smoking regulation. Robert Anderson -- Morgantown |
Ethics Commission May Want to Look at BOH THE DOMINION POST -- May 28, 2008
I am a private citizen and taxpayer in Monongalia County. Last
Thursday evening, I happened to tune in to “The Law Works” on WNPB and
learned about the state Ethics Commission. Then, when I read the
attached editorial in Sunday’s The Dominion Post, I thought that this
issue might very well warrant the Ethics Commission initiating a
complaint and investigation. It seems that at least one member of the
Monongalia County Board of Health may have a conflict of interest
regarding the Board’s ongoing consideration of a proposed regulation
that would ban smoking in restaurants, bars, etc.
Perhaps the ethics panel is already aware of this situation. If it
isn’t aware of this issue and if it’s worthy of consideration, then I
will be satisfied I have brought it to its attention. At the very
least, the Ethics Commission may have reason to offer counsel to
members of the BOH before they vote. As I understand the issue no board
members have recused themselves from deliberations on this issue in
public meetings of the BOH to date. Note that the Board of Health plans to meet on Thursday to vote on this proposed regulation. Robert M. Castellan -- Morgantown |
Nonsmokers Majority, Not Just a Niche Market THE DOMINION POST -- May 28, 2008
Mel Bankhead’s letter to the editor (DP-May 20) amusingly
generalizes all supporters of smokefree air as tee-totaling
prohibitionists, assuming that people who don’t want to breathe
cigarette smoke want to outlaw drinking.
He and many other local bar owners fail to understand simple economics.
Some 80 percent of our county’s residents are nonsmokers. That’s more
than just a niche market. Many of the people who want to see the
smoking ban pass would very much like to enjoy the area night life
without having their eyes and throats sting, their clothing and hair
reek of smoke, and without exposing their lungs to carcinogens.
While we appreciate those restaurants that offer a smoke-free dining
experience, our entertainment choices are extremely limited. To my
knowledge, Rain is the only bar in the county where a person can listen
to live bands and enjoy a cocktail without having to breathe other
people’s smoke. The 80 percent of our county residents who do not smoke
would like more choices. They want to go bowling, sing karaoke, watch
sports, and for those who imbibe, drink. If most of your clientele are
smokers, have you ever pondered why that is? And, yes, there are even
potential customers who might like to visit an adult business like
Bankhead’s, if it weren’t for the toxic air.
Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
GUEST COMMENTARY Clearly, Some Board of Health Members Should Step Aside THE DOMINION POST -- May 18, 2008
You don’t have to smoke for smoking to harm you. That’s why last
November the Tobacco Prevention Partnership asked the Monongalia County
Board of Health to update its outdated clean indoor-air regulation. The
BOH was asked to follow recommendations from the U.S. surgeon general
and prohibit smoking in all public places and workplaces in the county.
Smoke-free policies are nothing new. Indoor smoking has been
successfully banned in 12 countries, 22 states and 17 West Virginia
counties because secondhand smoke is a known health hazard.
The smoke-free policy proposed for Monongalia County has widespread
local support, including the backing of members of the medical
community, many local businesses, WVU student and faculty groups, the
Morgantown City Council, The Dominion Post and The Daily Athenaeum.
State law gives local boards of health the responsibility of regulating
indoor air. The Monongalia County BOH exists to protect and promote
public health; that role is stated clearly in the board’s bylaws. The
board has been presented with a mountain of scientific evidence on the
dangers of secondhand smoke and the benefits of smoke-free policies,
including the summary of the latest surgeon general’s report on
secondhand smoke and fact sheets like these found on the Centers for
Disease Control Web site: Smoke-free policies improve air quality. Smoke-free policies improve health. Smoke-free policies reduce smoking. Smoke-free policies do not hurt the hospitality industry.
The evidence shared with the BOH is so compelling that it is difficult
to understand why the board would choose not to act. Yet, it continues
to evade the issue, propose broad exemptions and stall. Why? Perhaps it is because three members, Sam Chico, August Lucci and Bob Bell, have clear conflicts of interest.
A conflict of interest exists when the actions of someone in a trusted
position (such as members of the BOH) are influenced or perceived to be
influenced by the outside business interests of that individual, a
close friend or a relative.
Chico, BOH chairman, owns a chain of 40 convenience stores, and profits
from cigarette sales. According to the National Association of
Convenience Stores, cigarettes account for roughly 37 percent of sales
at convenience stores. Since smoking bans have been shown to increase
quit rates and decrease cigarette sales, Chico has an obvious conflict
of interest. Less smoking is good for public health, but likely bad for
Chico’s business. Clearly, he should step aside.
Lucci is employed by his nephew, who provides leadership and financial
backing to the group opposed to the proposed smoke-free regulation.
Lucci’s nephew and employer owns or has interests in a bowling alley, a
Hot Spot and a bar, all of which he claims will suffer if a smoke-free
policy passes. Undoubtedly, Lucci is in a position to be influenced
through his employment and family relationship. Clearly, he should step
aside.
The three members of the County Commission decide who sits on the Board
of Health. Commissioner Bell appointed himself to the BOH. He also
appointed Chico to the board at the time of numerous controversies
involving Bell’s own conduct on the BOH. The Dominion Post reported
that “Chico submitted a letter of interest just one day before the
vote” that seated him on the board over a local physician.
Bell’s campaign finance disclosure shows the Chico family and related
businesses contributed at least $6,000 to Bell’s campaign, representing
nearly half of all contributions more than $250. Coincidentally, the
vice president of Suburban Lanes Inc. also made a $1,000 contribution
to Bell’s campaign. Suburban Lanes is the establishment that employs
its family member, August Lucci. The public could easily perceive that
Bell has a conflict of interest. Clearly, he should step aside.
Boards of health are intended to be free from political pressure to
ensure the public’s health is considered above all else. Governmental
bodies, such as the Monongalia County BOH, should perform their duties
with integrity and in a manner that avoids even the appearance of
wrongdoing. For this reason, BOH bylaws forbid members to participate
in issues where a conflict of interest exists.
At the March BOH meeting, Chico and Lucci were charged with having
conflicts of interest regarding the proposed smoke-free policy due to
the nature of their businesses. The board violated its bylaws when it
dismissed the conflict of interest assertion, rather than putting the
matter to a vote.
Competing personal and professional interests make it difficult for
board members Bell, Chico and Lucci to fulfill their BOH duties
impartially. Even if no improper action occurs, a conflict of interest
creates the appearance of impropriety that can undermine public
confidence. To
remove all doubt that personal interests might affect their actions,
Lucci, Chico and Bell should voluntarily abstain from further
discussions and all votes on the proposed smoking regulations under
consideration by the BOH. Clearly, they should step aside.
Valerie Frey-McClung
is
co-chair of the Smoke Free Mon County Coalition. She lives in
Morgantown. This commentary should be considered another point of view
and not necessarily the opinion or editorial policy of The Dominion
Post. |
Tobacco Companies Opt for Profits Over People THE DOMINION POST -- May 16, 2008
Last week, according to Mel Bankhead, we were “mercenaries.” His
latest desperate claim about smoking ban supporters is that we are all
unwitting “pawns” of the evil pharmaceutical empire. Even if drug
companies were funding smoking bans to sell more product, their actions
pale in comparison to the tobacco industry.
For decades, the tobacco companies’ own studies showed that cigarettes
were addictive. While denying that fact to the public, they manipulated
the amount of nicotine in cigarettes and added substances to make them
more addictive. When it became clear that smoking causes a multitude of
health problems, the tobacco industry mobilized its resources to block
laws restricting tobacco use. That’s the only reason a product that
kills about half of the people who use it is still legal at all.
Tobacco companies spend $13.4 billion marketing their products in the
U.S. and $132 million in West Virginia to replace the customers they
kill. Then there’s the development of strawberry, watermelon, and
banana flavored products to get young people hooked. It’s hard to top
tobacco companies for capitalism at its worst.
Tragically, smokers are the ultimate industry pawns. An overwhelming
majority of the people who begin smoking will quickly become addicted.
Many people manage to quit, but far too many remain addicted for life.
People who are addicted to a substance like tobacco pay an enormous
price, not only in the money they throw away. The real price is ruining
their own health, and if they smoke around others, the health of their
families and co-workers. Many addicted smokers understandably oppose a
ban on smoking in public establishments because it will disrupt the
routines they’ve built to satisfy their need for that next cigarette.
In Morgantown, the group fighting so hard to keep the Board of Health
from implementing an effective public smoking ban, like the tobacco
industry, will gladly destroy your health as long as they can turn a
profit from it. Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
Three Members of BOH Ignoring Sworn Duty THE
DOMINION POST -- May 7, 2008
One thing became clear at the April 16 [Monongalia County] Board of
Health meeting. There can be no doubt that Board members Sam Chico,
Robert Bell and August Lucci are ignoring their sworn duty to protect
the health of all members of the public.
It is clear that Chico understands that secondhand smoke is a serious
health threat. He repeatedly expressed a desire to ban smoking in those
places his family frequents; hotel rooms and hospital entrances. Yet he
seems unwilling to limit exposure to secondhand smoke for other
segments of the population.
Bell does not want to consider the matter at all. Clean indoor air is a
local issue, but Bell wants someone else to tackle the problem. In
previous meetings, when evidence of the health ravages of secondhand
smoke was presented by experts, Bell dodged the topic raising
irrelevant questions pertaining to hairspray and radon. He has conveyed
no understanding or concern about the issue of secondhand smoke.
While Dorcas Davis and Donna Tenant have indicated a desire to protect
the public from a toxic substance, Bell, Chico and Lucci are willing to
overlook overwhelming evidence from credible authorities.
Two clean indoor air proposals have been submitted to the BOH, one from
the Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention Partnership and one from the
Morgantown Bar and Video Lottery Association. Both state that
secondhand smoke causes cancer, heart disease and respiratory illness
in healthy nonsmokers. Both proposals state that smoking bans remain
the most viable and cost-effective solution for protecting patrons.
Current regulation states that where the need to breathe smoke-free air
conflicts with the desire to smoke, the need to breathe smoke-free air
shall have priority.
Given these facts, there is no defensible reason a BOH would not
protect any person’s health, employee or customer. Secondhand smoke is
a proven and preventable health hazard. Yet three BOH members are
apparently unwilling to protect patrons or workers in the places where
the greatest exposure to secondhand smoke occurs.
The BOH’s job is to protect the health of the entire public: not only
children; not only themselves or their families. What sense does it
make to exempt the very businesses where the health problem is the
worst? The only explanation we can come up with is that these three
members of the BOH are more concerned about their own interests or are
succumbing to pressure from the owners of bars, gambling spots and
tobacco retailers than protecting the public’s health. If they are
unable to fulfill their obligation to promote public health and prevent
disease, the citizens of Monongalia should insist that they resign
immediately. Catherine Whitworth and Valerie Frey-McClung Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
Many People Volunteer Time to Better Community THE
DOMINION POST -- May 4, 2008
Mel Bankhead may be short on the facts but he sure can deliver a
punch. Like when he alleges that Smoke Free Mon County’s members are
“mercenaries” getting paid to “ram a smoking ban down the public’s
throat.”
While it comes as no surprise that some health professionals and
organizations do join us in our efforts, the vast majority of our 70
members and volunteers receive no compensation for working to improve
indoor-air quality.
Smoke Free Mon County has no dues, cash contributions or treasury to
pay salaries. Would Bankhead also have us believe John McGraw, an
employee of a local bowling facility, is having his pay docked by his
boss for the time he spends generating form letters, spouting garbage
on the radio and writing regulations to expand public smoking in
Monongalia County?
Given that Bankhead and his bar, bowling and gambling cronies are only
defending their own personal profits, it must be beyond his
comprehension that there are many people who volunteer countless hours
trying to improve their communities. Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
Food Service Staff Suffer Secondhand Smoke THE
DOMINION POST -- May 3, 2008
Food service workers, especially those who work in bars, have
more exposure to secondhand smoke than workers in any other profession.
Women make up the majority of food service workers, so they face
greater risks from secondhand smoke.
Young women who are frequently exposed to secondhand smoke are nearly
twice as likely to develop breast cancer as those who are not exposed.
Secondhand smoke accounts for nearly one-third of breast cancers among
young women workers in the food service industry.
The Monongalia County Board of Health has this information. I trust
they will use it in fulfilling their duty to protect the health of
everyone who lives, works or visits in this county by passing the ban
on indoor smoking.
Barb Howe -- Morgantown |
Wellness Program Backs Clean Indoor-Air Proposal THE
DOMINION POST -- May 3, 2008
The Wellness Program of the WVU Health Sciences Campus would like
to express our full support of a clean indoor-air regulation that
restricts smoking in all public areas and places of employment in
Monongalia County.
As you know, Morgantown was recently named a Well City by the Wellness
Councils of America. This is an admirable accomplishment, and
demonstrates that many employers within our community are truly
committed to protecting and promoting the wellness of their employees.
Yet in the heart of our downtown , right next to the banners
proclaiming our Well City status, the streets are lined with
establishments that continuously expose both employees and patrons to
the toxic and cancer-causing effects of secondhand smoke.
Secondhand smoke is an entirely preventable hazard to our workforce
that can be eliminated through the passage of a clean indoor-air
regulation that protects everyone. Exemptions for certain types of
establishments imply that it is acceptable to poison one group of
workers or patrons, but not another.
It is not the job of the Board of Health to determine which individuals
are worthy of protection and which are not. Given the concrete evidence
that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke, we
strongly urge the Monongalia County BOH to honor its responsibility to
protect the health of all citizens by enacting this regulation. Sara Lauren Fehling Health Educator -- Morgantown |
Board Should Not be Blinded by Smokescreen THE
DOMINION POST -- April 27, 2008
In
his letter to the editor (DPApril 19), David Martinelli advised the
Board of Health to “drop the proposal” for a smoking ban in public
places in Monongalia County. The basis for this recommendation was a
recent study that finds a correlation between smoking bans and drunk
driving.
Martinelli glosses over some important details from this study that
controvert his suggestion. First, the authors of the study acknowledge
that smoking bans have positive health benefits, and in no way do they
demonstrate that traffic fatalities “more than offset any health
benefits that can be expected from the proposal” as claimed by
Martinelli.
Second, the authors found that this effect did not occur in the
counties that had large college towns, possibly due to a concentration
of bars within walking distance of most patrons. Therefore, this study most likely does not apply to our situation in Monongalia County.
Most importantly, the relevance of this study to the proposed smoking
ban is highly questionable. The primary question before the Board of
Health is whether secondhand smoke presents a serious health risk to
the citizens of Monongalia County.
The data is indisputable that this is the case, as even the Bar and
Video Lottery Association has acknowledged in its counterproposal.
Drunk driving, while of great concern, is a separate issue, which must
be addressed by policies specifically targeted at reducing this
reprehensible practice.
I sincerely hope that the board is not blinded by this smokescreen, and
that it act as its charter demands, and ban smoking in all enclosed
public spaces. Stephen DiFazio -- Morgantown |
Government Should Step in on Health of Nation THE
DOMINION POST -- April 27, 2008
I’d like to put my two cents in also about cigarettes and alcohol.
I’m a nonsmoker and nondrinker, but I have seen over the years the
destruction and sadness and health problems it keeps bringing to our
nation and the addiction that grows worse from day to day.
I know the folks who have this addiction don’t like what I’m writing,
but the government needs to finally step in and think of the real
health of the nation. There are many other addictions, and we are in
need of help. Ruth Shagula -- Morgantown |
Board of Health Obligated to Protect Community THE
DOMINION POST -- April 27, 2008
The
[Monongalia County] Board of Health is facing a critical decision in
the coming weeks, a choice that will impact this community’s future
well-being. The BOH must decide who warrants protection from secondhand
smoke and whether the perceived “rights” of a small segment of the
business community outweigh health considerations for the public.
Most residents of Monongalia County do not smoke. Most of us would
prefer a smoke-free environment when we go out to socialize with
friends and family. Yet our choices are limited by those businesses
that feel no obligation to provide safe, smoke-free air.
The time has come for Monongalia County Board of Health to act in the
best interests of the majority. Adopt an indoor smoking ban that
protects everyone, everywhere. Karen Benchoff -- Morgantown |
BOH Members Not Acting like Public Health Officers THE
DOMINION POST -- April 27, 2008
After
attending the Board of Health meeting April 16, I found it
disconcerting that [Monongalia County Board of Health Chairman] Sam
Chico and Bob Bell, a member of the BOH, warned those in attendance the
cleanindoor proposal may take further study and the BOH should not be
confined to a decision by June 1.
This goes against a previous statement that a vote would occur by June
1 prior to BOH member Dorcas Davis’s stepping down from the board (who
happens to support clean-indoor air).
Chico would now like to see exemptions added for certain establishments
and add language to protect us from nuisance smoke at hotel rooms where
someone previously smoked and visually unappealing smoking in front of
hospitals. Trying to appear more inclusive, he is avoiding focus. The
issue is direct exposure to secondhand smoke. That’s it.
It is also amusing to listen to Bell’s irrelevant questions — excuse
for not reviewing the proposal on clean-indoor air prior to the
meeting, and request for information he has already been given (on
other counties with cleanindoor air). His behavior is not one of a
public health official. So vote, please vote and let the public know where you stand. Dave Harshbarger -- Morgantown |
Board of Health Should Show Some Leadership THE
DOMINION POST -- April 26, 2008
As
many readers are fully aware, the debate over a clean air ordinance to
make public places smoke free continued last week with a special
meeting of the Monongalia County Board of Health to discuss the
measure. The meeting was largely dominated by discussions on smoking
restrictions in hotels with a noticeable avoidance of the much more
controversial and important issue of smoking in bars and nightclubs.
Bars and nightclubs are significant in this discussion because they
represent the highest public exposure to secondhand smoke. However, the
board seems keen to only allow a cursory discussion of smoking in these
locations. In one of the few instances where smoking in bars was
mentioned, BOH chairman Sam Chico stated that a ban on smoking in all
public establishments would be “beyond the leading edge.”
West Virginia communities should not be content to lag behind the
leading edge. Citizens should not be forced to sacrifice our health
while our public servants wait for some magical number of other
communities to show real leadership.
This said, I want to challenge that in going smoke free, Monongalia
County will not be “beyond the leading edge” as Chico conjectures. Our
BOH would in fact be showing real leadership by joining other areas of
the United States that have gone smoke free.
The list includes more than 20 states, the District of Columbia, and
more than 240 other counties and cities (including many in West
Virginia). Clearly, comprehensive smoke-free regulation has some
precedence. This is in part due to health boards across the country who
have shown integrity and courage by not caving to self-serving special
interests.
Let’s demand Chico and the other BOH members embrace their leadership
roles and provide all residents of Monongalia County with protection
from secondhand smoke in all public places.
Jared Pomeroy -- Morgantown |
County Board Obligated to Protect Our Health THE
DOMINION POST -- April 26, 2008
I recently missed out on a great entertainment experience because
of the current, inadequate smoking regulation in bars. The best 1980s
cover band on the East Coast played a local bar, and I had to
persistently turn down my friends’ offers to join them for a night of
fun.
When asked in astonishment why I wasn’t going, I had to reply that I
didn’t want to spend my evening in a smoke-filled bar because of the
effects I would feel afterwards such as tight lungs, coughing and sinus
irritation.
Also in recent news, Sam Chico (the chairman of the Monongalia County
Board of Health) made it clear at the recent BOH special meeting that
he is only willing to take action on smoking situations that affect him
and his family personally (e.g., hotel rooms and hospital entrances).
While I agree that stronger smoking bans need to be in place in those
locations, I don’t agree that smoking in bars and restaurants should be
ignored (regardless of age!).
As a young citizen, I would like to visit bars and restaurants for
entertainment and cuisine. As a nonsmoker and health-conscience
individual, I require that those establishments be smokefree in order
for me to visit them.
Unlike the BOH members, I don’t have the power and obligation to enact
regulations to protect my health. Therefore, I expect Board of Health
members to adhere to their duties and protect everyone’s health
regardless of age, personal experience or business relationships. Melissa Taylor -- Morgantown |
No Public Health Reason For Not Supporting Ban THE
DOMINION POST -- April 22, 2008
I attended the Board of Health meeting on March 27, to support
the regulation that would guarantee smoke-free air in all public places
in Monongalia County. Clean air supporters showed up in large numbers,
including a fair number of WVU students even though it was spring
break.
Many individuals spoke respectfully and reasonably during the public
comment period to urge the BOH to pass the 100 percent smoke-free air
regulation.
Dr. Scot Renick, director of the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center,
expressed concern, presenting research that substantiates the fact that
we are a nation facing a dramatic increase in the incidence of lung
cancer in nonsmokers. He attributed secondhand smoke exposure as the
one significant factor in this increase.
I’ve experienced this personally. My father died 3 years ago from
complications of lung and heart disease. Each time a physician viewed
his chest X-ray their first question would be “how long have you
smoked?”
My father never smoked a day in his life. His lung and heart disease
were the result of exposure to secondhand smoke acquired while sharing
office space at work. In the 1950s, ’60s and ’70s the knowledge and
facts concerning the harmful side-effects from exposure to cigarette
smoke were relatively unknown. Fortunately, current research provides
us a much clearer body of knowledge to base, for the good of all, our
decisions today.
At the BOH meeting a member of the audience asked the board if they
could name a single public health reason for not supporting the
proposed public smoking ban — it is the Board of Health’s
responsibility to separate myth and misinformation from facts. The
facts are known, secondhand smoke kills. No other argument can dispute
this fact. The Board of Health has a clear responsibility to protect
everyone from exposure to secondhand smoke in Monongalia County.
Sue Turnbull, RN, Clinical Nurse Educator WVU Student Health Service -- Morgantown |
Morgantown Needs to OK New No-smoking Policy THE
DOMINION POST -- April 18, 2008
The prolonged debate over whether to ban smoking in public places
in Monongalia County perplexes me. Why in the world would our Board of
Health, whose duty is “to protect the public health,” even hesitate to
allow smoking to continue in public places? This is not an issue of
imposing on other people’s civil liberties, but doing what is right in
the name of health.
Nonsmokers should be able to go out in public in areas without
experiencing the negative effects of other people’s cigarette smoke.
Smokers can chose to smoke, but can do so in areas that don’t harm
others around them.
And nonsmoking bans in public places have been adopted everywhere — we
are certainly one of the last to jump on the bandwagon.
Smoking is bad for your health any way you look at it. West Virginia
has the highest rate of smoking of any state in the country, and any
effort to help reduce our high smoking rate should be given
consideration. The state’s high smoking rate only produces negative
results — unnecessarily overburdening our hospitals (it is proven that
smokers have far more health issues than nonsmokers), increasing our
health insurance costs, creating an inefficient work force (smokers
miss more work than nonsmokers) and making the area less attractive to
live in for those moving in from outside the state.
If the BOH refuses to believe that adopting a nonsmoking policy in all
area bars and restaurants will not harm the public, then they are not
fulfilling their duty to the people of Monongalia County.
It is a sad state of affairs when a local bar and video lottery lobby
overrides what is the right and moral thing to do in the name of good
health.
And it has been proven over and over again that adopting a nonsmoking
policy does not have a negative effect on bar and restaurant revenues.
In fact, in the Washington, D.C., area a ban had the opposite effect.
Stand up for what is in the best interest of this community and help
support a ban against smoking. In the end, everyone will win. You know
the old saying, “if you have your health, you have just about
everything.” Why is this concept so difficult to understand in
Monongalia County? Ann D. Turnicky -- Morgantown |
Public Opinion Favors New Smoking Regulation THE
DOMINION POST -- April 18, 2008
The Dominion Post’s excellent editorial on Sunday noted that the
[Monongalia County] Board of Health’s primary job is to protect the
public’s health. Right on. I also agree with the editorial’s point that
public policy should not be determined by public opinion. I want to
correct one misperception though.
The editorial implies that a majority of people oppose the stronger
smoking regulation. Some may think so because those opposed to the
regulation collected more signatures than those who support it.
True, they did, but that’s not a valid measure of public opinion. You
have to consider how the signatures were collected. The BOH did not
design the comment period to be a vote or a scientific study.
There are more reliable measures of public opinion. One is the 2007
West Virginia Adult Tobacco Survey. This scientific survey found that
63 percent of state residents believe that smoking should not be
allowed in any indoor work areas.
That of course includes bars, restaurants, video lottery establishments
and bowling alleys. Only 30 percent thought smoking should be allowed
in some areas, and a mere 5 percent thought it should not be
restricted. So, even a large majority of smokers think smoking should be restricted!
These findings are in line with the current WAJR poll, which is not
scientific, but at least reaches a cross section of the public.
The WAJR poll asks, “Are you in favor of a Monongalia County-wide
smoking ban?” To date, 64 percent favor the ban and 36 percent oppose
it. (To participate in the poll, go to wajr.com, and scroll to the poll
on the left of the page.)
The editorial said the paper’s editorial position would not be swayed
by public opinion. Rather, it will be based on its view of what’s best
for the community. Not to worry. A solid majority of the public shares your opinion and surely appreciates your willingness to stand up for it. Thanks for supporting the important effort to make Monongalia County a healthier, cleaner place to live and work.
Alex Lubman -- Morgantown |
Why Are There Questions on Secondhand Smoke Risk? THE
DOMINION POST -- April 17, 2008 It
gives me great pride to report that my husband and I are both
ex-smokers who have chosen to live a healthier life. The decision was
easy. The process was difficult, but we did it. We did it because we
knew that smoking was killing us. Secondhand smoke kills people too,
even nonsmokers. My father owned and operated a bar throughout his adult life. He never smoked. Yet, cancer took his life.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reports that the three top
causes of lung cancer are smoking, radon gas and secondhand smoke.
Research has proven there is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke
exposure. Even brief exposure can be harmful.
I cannot understand why our local [Monongalia County] Board of Health
is dragging its feet. If I worked in a building with known asbestos
exposure or radon gas exposure, the BOH would be expected to take
measures to protect my health immediately. Why then is there any question about protecting me, and other nonsmokers, from secondhand smoke? Toni Morris, RN -- Morgantown |
Bar and Video Group’s Regulation Ridiculous THE
DOMINION POST -- April 16, 2008
As many of you know, the [Monongalia County] Board of Health
decided in its last meeting to postpone a vote on Smoke Free Mon
County’s proposed ban on smoking in public areas to consider a version
of it modified by Morgantown’s Bar and Video Lottery Association. I
recently reviewed copies of both versions of the ban — side-by-side.
Major changes were made that defeat the purpose of a public smoking
ban, and create a counter-proposal that fails to protect people from
secondhand smoke. Here are my findings on the bar owners’ alternative
proposal: Redefines “public place” to only include areas available to people under the age of 18.
Defines a bar as any area that holds a license to sell alcohol to the
public, including areas of nonsmoking establishments that are separated
from nonsmoking areas. Allows unregulated smoking in bars and video
lottery establishments. Permits all outdoor seating areas to allow
smoking. Removes bar and video lottery owners and employees from nearly
any responsibility in enforcing the measure (it will be the
responsibility of the health department to hire enough health officers
to ensure compliance; owners and employees will not even be required to
ask a person to stop smoking in a nonsmoking area). Changes wording regarding smoking at building entrances; the words “15 feet or more” were removed.
Furthermore, this is all being proposed by redefining public space to
only include areas available to people under 18, and allowing bars and
video lotteries to be exempt from smoking regulations. In effect,
citizens should not expect a single change from the current
smoke-filled environment if the opposition’s version of the regulation
is the one that’s passed.
One of the biggest issues the bar owners have raised with the smoking
ban is that it violates the rights of individuals. More explicitly,
they claim it takes away freedom and liberty. The bar and video lottery
owners are not defenders of individual rights. In their altered
regulation, they make it clear just how little they care about notions
of personal liberty.
Their true (and unfounded) fear is that they might suffer a decline in
business. Their proposal added a provision to Smoke Free Mon County’s
proposal that would prohibit smoking in vehicles in which “any children
under the age of 18 are present, either at the time of such smoking or
on any ... regular basis.”
The bar and video lottery owners have made a pitiful attempt to
disguise continued exposure to secondhand smoke as some sort of
effective cleanair regulation. Their counter-proposal is a mockery, and
I only hope our BOH will not join their ranks. Let’s all encourage the
BOH to pass Smoke Free Mon County’s original proposal.
Jared Lee Pomeroy -- Morgantown |
If Dirty Kitchens Not OK, Why is Dirty Air All Right? THE
DOMINION POST -- April 15, 2008
The Monongalia County Board of Health needs to do the right thing and
ban indoor smoking in all public places without compromise. I visited
Ireland after they had implemented their nationwide ban of indoor smoke
in all public places. I spoke with numerous smokers in the pubs in
Dublin and was told that, although there was initial resistance to the
ban, now the majority of smokers agree that the ban was a good thing.
The pubs were more enjoyable with no smoke and it wasn’t a big problem
to step outside to have a cigarette. The pubs continued to thrive
because the ban was uniformly applied to all public places.
Comprehensive smoking bans have been implemented in more than 16 states
in this country, in numerous countries including France, the United
Kingdom, Germany, Australia, and even Mexico City! New York City has
been smoke-free since 2003 and one study showed that bar/restaurant
revenues, jobs and liquor licenses increased in the 10 months after the
ban.
As a family doctor, I care for many people who have health conditions
that are greatly worsened by exposure to indoor smoke. For some
patients with asthma or chronic lung disease, even brief inadvertent
exposure to smoke can cause severe symptoms. The scientific evidence
about the harmful effects of indoor smoke on nonsmokers is great.
One study found a 27 percent decrease in heart attacks in Pueblo,
Colo., in the six months after implementing an indoor smoke ban. Since
presumably smokers continued to smoke at home, most of this benefit was
to nonsmokers. It is known that transient exposure to tobacco smoke
causes changes in blood clotting characteristics and blood vessel
constriction which could contribute to triggering a heart attack. The
health department should implement this ban to protect nonsmokers.
Smokers have the right to smoke, but not the right to make others
around them suffer harmful effects. Many people, smokers and
nonsmokers, dislike having burning eyes and stinking clothes after
coming home from a bar or restaurant.
Individual bar owners may wish to have smoking establishments, but they
should be required to maintain a clean air environment because they
serve the public. The health department wouldn’t permit some bars to
have dirty kitchens, and so they should not permit some bars to have
unhealthy air. Bar and restaurant revenue and public health will be
best protected if the ban is applied uniformly to all indoor public
places. Board of Health, the citizens of this county need you to do the
right thing.
Karen Fitzpatrick, MD -- Morgantown |
BOH Needs to Look at Itself in the Mirror THE
DOMINION POST -- April 14, 2008
As a newcomer to Morgantown, I was surprised that a comprehensive
smoke-free air law protecting health and safety of employees and
citizens in Monongalia County had not passed to date.
I was even more surprised about the debate related to proposed
smoke-free air legislation within the Monongalia County Board of
Health, which according to its bylaws is an agency whose object is “...
to achieve a healthy community by protecting and promoting public
health through education, training, community awareness, provision of
health services, and advocacy.” Entire
countries, states and hundreds of localities across the United States
have passed comprehensive smoke-free air legislation to protect all
workers and the general public from secondhand smoke exposure ...
surely these localities, states, and countries are acting to protect
and promote the health of their citizens.
Designated smoking areas and ventilated areas are not effective means
of preventing secondhandsmoke exposure. We unequivocally know “there is
no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke.”
I recently attended a meeting in Seattle, and was fortunate enough to
hear a closing address given by the U.S. surgeon general, Dr. Richard
Carmona. He discussed the opposition and political pressure faced in
releasing the 2006 report on secondhand-smoke exposure and commented
that as the surgeon general you are the “... doctor of the American
people ...” and you must “... look in the mirror and face yourself ...”
in this position every day. I am asking members of the Monongalia
County BOH to look in the mirror and face themselves each day as the
protectors and promoters of public health for this county and to be
true to their charge established in Article II of their bylaws: “... by
protecting and promoting public health.”
Cindy Tworek, Ph.D. WVU School of Pharmacy -- Morgantown |
EDITORIAL The Facts Don’t Blow Smoke -- BOH Should Fulfill Duty to Public, Not Public Opinion THE
DOMINION POST -- April 13, 2008
The Monongalia County Board of Health doesn’t need public opinion on its side — it has the facts.
In the coming weeks, the BOH is going to review and discuss two
proposed initiatives on public smoking and more than 3,500 public
comments that were submitted to it earlier this year. It has also heard
from the public at several meetings on this issue.
Some might think otherwise, but the purpose of this public input has
not been for reasons of polling or surveying opinion.
The BOH’s primary obligation is to protect the public’s health, and
there’s no one who can make a reasonable argument that smoking is not
hazardous to your health. And it’s empowered by the law of the land to do that within the public domain.
We have already endorsed the Monongalia County Clean Air Coalition’s
proposal that bans smoking in all public locations and in workplaces,
and we won’t change our mind for public opinion.
It’s been said where facts are few, experts are many. In this
circumstance, the facts are overwhelming, but those with the most
opinions pretend to be the experts — with the fewest facts.
Admittedly, some elected and even appointed public officials do make
decisions based upon public opinion research, but that’s not the way
it’s supposed to work.
That’s why we elect and appoint our representatives. They make the
decisions based on facts and conscience, not public opinion. If our
nation were to put every issue in the form of a public referendum, the
gridlock in Charleston and Washington might look promising.
We are not discounting public opinion. This section of our newspaper
publishes it daily. Yet, in this instance, regarding the BOH, it should
only be for informational purposes that might shed light on this issue
— not determine who’s for it and against it.
Especially when the evidence is so well documented. This issue is not
revolutionary, either. Cities, counties, states and nations have banned
smoking in all public venues — including Chicago, New York state, Italy
and 17 counties in our state. All of these places and hundreds more have smoke-free restaurants and bars.
There’s no reason to have a BOH if it’s sole purpose is to rubber-stamp
public opinion. Clearly, we are never going to be able to regulate or
legislate common sense, but we can regulate and legislate public health
and safety in public places. The reason BOH exists is to make such decisions, without kow-towing to politics or public opinion.
How could the BOH not support a smoking ban that protects everyone?
Only by ignoring the facts and its responsibility. |
New Proposal Actually Expands Smoking Areas THE
DOMINION POST -- April 13, 2008
Mel
Bankhead recently wrote (DP-April 9) about the supposed merits of the
Morgantown Bar and Video Lottery Association’s proposed “smoking ban.”
Since neither that group, nor the [Monongalia County] Board of Health
has offered up any details, I’d like to offer readers a synopsis of
some of the major elements of their “regulation.” Rather than banning
smoking in public areas, it actually expands smoking far beyond what is
allowed by the current regulation.
A “public place” is defined as only those areas available to people
under the age of 18. This excludes video lottery places from meeting
any requirements.
A “bar” is exempt and is defined as any business that holds a license
to sell alcohol to the public. Notice that they use the word “sell”
instead of “serve.” This change expands the number and types of
businesses where smoking is unrestricted far past just bars. Smoking
could again be allowed in many restaurants, grocery stores, convenience
stores, liquor stores and yes, even bowling alleys.
The workplace provisions of the Tobacco Prevention Partnership’s
proposal are completely gutted. Smoking would be permitted in private
and multi-party offices, with no effort made at all to protect
nonsmokers and nonsmoking areas. Our current regulation has some of the
weakest workplace provisions in the state, but apparently they’re not
weak enough.
But even those provisions didn’t go far enough — they also propose to
make their “regulation” impossible to enforce. Business owners cannot
be held responsible for noncompliance and are not even required to ask
people not to smoke. Instead, they are to report the smoker to the
health department, who will deploy an official to appear immediately to
make them stop; 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This would cost
taxpayers roughly $120,000 annually.
As if all that isn’t ridiculous enough, they also added a provision to
prohibit smoking in vehicles in which children are present. Yes, the
flag-waving defenders of personal property rights are just fine with
telling people what they can do in their own private cars.
This shows just how disingenuous their “liberty” arguments are. They
hope to gain some support by pretending their regulation better
protects children — but they know the health department doesn’t have
the authority to stop vehicles.
Please don’t take our word as to the truth of what I’ve written. Go to
www.smokefreemonc.org and see a scanned copy of their proposed “health
regulation” for yourself. Our BOH could not be taking this parody of a
smoking ban seriously, could they? Come to the next BOH meeting and tell them to pass a clean indoor air regulation that protects everyone. Catherine Whitworth Smoke Free Mon County -- Morgantown |
The Way I See the Flap Over Smoking and Coach THE
DOMINION POST -- April 9, 2008 I
have read with interest about the continuing debate over the proposed
smoking ordinance. I feel when one examines the few indisputable facts
in the case, there is one and only one conclusion. Fact: Secondhand smoke is harmful. Fact: The [Monongalia County] Board of Health’s primary responsibility is to protect the public. And Rich Rodriguez should pay the $4 million.
Scott Hanks -- Morgantown |
Reader Takes Exception to Defense of Smoking THE
DOMINION POST -- April 8, 2008
For weeks I’ve followed the back-and-forth comments on the
proposed smoking ban in Monongalia County. I took some excerpts from
one letter in particular that I thought to be absolutely ridiculous.
“The Board of Health’s recent meeting showed democracy at work and the
hint of a true republic.” First off a republic does not equal a
democracy. The democracy comes in voting to elect those in office to
make decisions (the republic). However, this point is irrelevant. The
decision to protect public health is not a matter of democracy, rather
a responsibility of law for the Board of Health to uphold.
“Apparently, some BOH members wanted to actually see what we all had to
say about the ban and thus provide for the due process of law and not
deny anyone within their jurisdiction equal protection of the law ...”
In this matter, the only process due by law is that of the Board to
protect the public health as stated before.
Here’s an idea. Let’s arrest the smokers that leave a trail of litter
everywhere they go, and then deny them their rights by law to have a
quick and fair trial. Then this statement may actually apply.
“... Because where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
there can be no rule making or legislation that would abrogate them.” I
think a review by the most scholastic of scholars would show that
nowhere in the document does it state that a person has the right to
smoke in public, yet alone endanger the public at large with its
secondhand effects. If anything, the Constitution was written to
protect the rights to safety of individuals.
“... Need to realize that the antismoking groups keep themselves busy
with a constant letter-writing campaign to the newspaper and in
communication with other nonsmoking groups, who call into radio
stations, write health departments and provide support, etc.” Is this
not the strategy of any advocate on either side? If I’m not mistaken,
it was a local bar owner that had fliers passed around to have everyone
show up for the initial proposal to the BOH. I also believe the
majority of public comments opposing the ban were in the form of a
chain letter with the only difference being the name on each one. This
sounds more like a strong-arm violation of the freedom of speech than
anything. At least allow some independence.
I’ve noticed one underlying trait in many of the ban opposing comments
— some speak with confidence, but they do so from a point of ignorance.
Instead, people should try basing their opinions on accurate
interpretation and rational thought. However, if they choose the first,
understand that it’s far better to remain silent and be thought of as
ignorant, than to speak and remove all doubt.
Larry Johnson -- Morgantown |
Thanks to City Council for Anti-smoking Effort THE
DOMINION POST -- April 6, 2008
The Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention Partnership applauds the
City Council of Morgantown for easily passing in a 6-1 vote on Tuesday,
a resolution supporting policies that provide the maximum protection
from secondhand smoke in all public places and in places of employment.
This position is consistent with the council’s historical support for
smoke-free policies and acknowledges a value for public health that is
consistent with the “Well City” award recently bestowed on Morgantown.
We thank the council members for demonstrating commitment to the health
and well-being of all of its represented citizens. Catherine Whitworth Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention Partnership -- Morgantown |
Hope Proposal Doesn’t End Up on Letterman THE
DOMINION POST -- April 6, 2008
The smoking regulation proposed by the Mon County Bar and Video Lottery Business Association is a laugh a minute.
What would you expect of a public health regulation proposed by owners
of strip clubs, bars and gambling joints? If their proposal is adopted,
we’ll make national news, not to mention Leno and Letterman.
No offense meant, but these folks simply don’t have the background in
public health (or the incentive) to develop a proposal that safeguards
health. They are business people, and will naturally and understandably safeguard their business interests.
The BOH has received excellent advice from doctors and public health
practitioners at the WVU School of Medicine. The chairman of community
medicine and the director of the Mary Randolph Babb Cancer Center have
addressed the BOH.
These health professionals gave compelling reasons to adopt the
original proposal, which protects all citizens. Let’s hope the BOH
takes their advice rather than that of the bar owners.
The association members say the proposal supported by the health
community violates their rights and the rights of their smoking
patrons.
Yet this is too good to be true because their own proposal bans smoking
in your car if anyone under 18 is present. It’s true! These folks,
whose main argument has been “liberty,” want to regulate your behavior
in your vehicle — but hands off their bars. I’m not saying this is a
bad or good idea, but it sure is inconsistent with the “civil
liberties” they claim they want to protect.
Finally, I am appalled by the “gentleman” who stooped to mocking
Catherine Whitworth in a letter to the editor. How childish and
undeserved.
Whitworth is a classy person who is working overtime to improve the
health of Monongalia County residents. There’s nothing in it for her
but hard work and grief. She respectfully challenged the board. She was
completely justified in asking two members to abstain from voting due
to conflicts of interest. Let’s hope we don’t make Letterman.
Alex Lubman -- Morgantown |
Make Decision in Best Interest of Public Health THE
DOMINION POST -- April 6, 2008
In a recent letter to The Dominion Post, a writer suggested
readers Google “pro-smoking” to find out what smoking proponents had to
say about the debate over secondhand smoke. I took his advice. Here are
just a few of the arguments I found, and the problems with them.
People who think it’s OK to smoke in public places say proper
ventilation makes the air safe. Not so, according to the American
Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers. which
is the international standard-setting body for indoor air quality.
Their position is that “ventilation cannot remove all the health risks
caused by secondhand smoke.” Their conclusion: “Tobacco smoke does not
belong in indoor areas.”
Some businesses want “minors only” provisions. These would prohibit
smoking in venues where minors are admitted. But smokefree regulations
are meant to protect all people, not just minors. Adults and minors,
employees and patrons. All are equally at risk from toxic chemicals in
secondhand smoke. Think about it.
A business owner in the community advocates and is using “hours
provisions.” This approach prohibits smoking at certain times. The
problem with this approach is that it doesn’t work. The toxins in
secondhand smoke stay in the building for days after the smoking
occurs.
Some business owners, especially those who see this as a personal
liberty issue, think it’s OK to permit smoking as long as they post
signs stating their policy. The problem with this approach is that it
doesn’t help employees who have to breathe the smoky air for eight
hours a day.
Nor does it protect people who enter any way because they are not aware
of the health hazards of secondhand smoke, nor the kids that come in
with them. Liberty does not extend to harming our innocent neighbors.
Pressuring workers, who may fear losing their jobs to consent to work
in a smoke-filled business, is not a reasonable solution either.
Workers should not have to choose between jeopardizing their health and
earning a salary.
The extremely vocal pro-smoking community has one point of view. To my
knowledge, no organized group has come to their defense. Shall we
accept their point of view, or that of the U.S. surgeon general and
other health experts, backed by the research of hundreds of scientists?
I urge the Monongalia County Board of Health to consider the source of
the information they use to help them make their decision. Then, make
the decision in the best interest of public health, the only area they
are designated to consider.
Elizabeth Prendergast Associate Director for Community Development WVU Prevention Research Center -- Morgantown |
Habits Shouldn’t Interfere with the Air We Breathe THE
DOMINION POST -- April 6, 2008
Holy smoke! This exclamation has a connection to reporters of the
1800s describing Native American ceremonies and the “holy smoke” drawn
from the sacred pipe. It allows one to see the breath which sustains
our life each and every moment. It is fair to say that the act of
smoking has become somewhat less reverent.
Smoking is basically the ingestion of chemicals, of which some are
established carcinogens. It is accepted that nicotene is the most
desired substance for its noticeable effects. One has the freedom to
ingest many things in many forms, legal and illegal.
Seated back to back in public, I might not know that you were eating,
drinking alcohol, taking pills, snorting cocaine or listening to music
on a headset. But put smoke into the air I must breathe and you are
most assuredly forcing yourself upon me.
Public establishments raise the argument to control their own
atmospheres to accommodate smokers. If you don’t like smoke, don’t come
in here. Many people don’t like smoke but enjoy the social activity
within local businesses, or they endure the hardship if they can’t find
work elsewhere.
So they expose themselves to toxic chemicals because someone chooses to
foul the air. Why should the choice fall in favor of environmental and
personal degradation? Enforce the nosmoking ordinance in favor of
healthful respiration and I would think some habitual smokers could rid
themselves, at least partially, of a destructive and costly practice. Eat, drink, talk, dance, listen to music without a cigarette. You might come to find how unnecessary it really is. Matthew Cross -- Morgantown |
Only People Who Smoke Go to Bars? Not Really THE
DOMINION POST -- April 4, 2008
The thing I would like the people against the proposed smoking
ban to know is that people have hobbies and interests that lead them
into a smoking facility. Because of their love, they will deal with the
smoke, although deep down they really don’t like it. There’s pool and
bowling leagues, and there’s the joy and atmosphere of watching a
Mountaineer game in a bar filled with Mountaineers fans. What are we do
to, give them up because “we have the choice to be at a smoking
facility?”
That is the stupidest argument for being against the ban I have ever
heard. Another dumb argument I heard is that bars are directly linked
to smoking, so therefore let’s ban smoking everywhere but in bars. So
let’s see here, only people who smoke go to bars? Ummm ... every time
I’m in a bar, there are actually more nonsmokers than smokers.
Everyone likes to go to a bar for drinks and entertainment, not just
smokers. Another way to look at “bars are linked to smoking” is that am
I to understand that someone who smokes only smokes while he or she is
at a bar.... that if they were not a bar, they would not be smoking.
Give me a break.
Smokers smoke all day long, no matter what they’re doing at home, at a
bar, driving their car, at the park, etc. So don’t try to tell me bars
are directly tied to smokers.
Everyone hates change, but this a change for the better, so please
Morgantown, do the right thing and pass the smoking ban. Jason Porter -- Morgantown |
Board of Health Needs to Show Leadership THE
DOMINION POST -- April 4, 2008
It has been brought to my attention that the [Monongalia County]
Board of Health may be considering a compromise that allows smoking in
places (bars) with an age restriction of 21 or possibly 18. The Boston
Beanery is adamantly against any decision that allows smoking in bars
and not restaurants! Our bar sales average 20 percent to 25 percent of
our business in our two Morgantown locations. This portion of our
business is profitable compared to operating margins on the food
business.
We have a loyal customer base, many who smoke, which enjoys our tavern
environment. The last time this smoke issue was addressed, we ended up
spending thousands of dollars in both of our restaurants upgrading the
ventilation system to provide a quality indoor air experience for all
of our guests.
I informed the Health Department over the years that Boston Beanery
would comply and support a ban on smoking in all public places if it is
indeed the health board’s position that secondhand smoke is deadly. In
that situation, my business would be on an even playing field with
everyone in the bar business.
If a compromise is enacted, I would lose many customers who would find
it more convenient to go next door to drink and smoke rather than run
outside every 15 minutes in my bar. If a total ban is enforced, people
will still go to bars but will adjust to making frequent trips
outdoors.
It worked in Boston, Chicago, in Ashland, Ky., and now even in
Fairmont. What makes the BOH so afraid to do it in Morgantown? This
change in position brings up even more questions: Does the BOH really
think secondhand smoke is deadly? If so, why is it OK to sicken the
folks in bars and hot spots?
Do you have facts suggesting that people over the age of 18 or 21 are
not affected by secondhand smoke so as to support your compromise
solution? Is the BOH willing to compensate restaurants for all the
money put into ventilating systems years ago, when the partial ban was
passed? Is the BOH willing to compensate restaurants for lost profits
due to customers leaving to go to another bar?
If the BOH is caving in to special interest groups, I do not appreciate
the fact that the board does not respect my business as much as theirs.
If secondhand smoke is a deadly problem, show some leadership and pass
a total ban. If it is not a deadly problem, drop this whole charade and
move on. The public expects the Board of Health to protect them from
unsafe conditions, not to play politics. Either it is bad for everyone
in public, or bad for nobody!
David Seman, President Boston Beanery Restaurants |
Smoking Rule Needs to be Across the Board THE
DOMINION POST -- April 4, 2008 Damon’s
Grille in Morgantown is proud to be a nonsmoking establishment. The
fact that we are nonsmoking has in no way kept the business from being
profitable; in fact, it is just the opposite.
Damon’s is one of the few places where a family or friends can get a
good meal, enjoy each other’s company and watch a game, all while
enjoying a smoke-free environment. From the standpoint of our
employees, we are able to watch out for their well-being by providing
them a smoke-free workplace.
If Monongalia County is to go to a nonsmoking standard, I feel that the
regulations would have to be the same for all places in the county
(restaurant, bar and any other public place).
The most effective way to enforce the rule is for it to be even —
across the board. If the regulations are the same for all, then there
is no way in which this can hurt one’s business. Derick Haddix, Owner Damon’s Grille -- Morgantown |
Mon County Should Clean Up Its Act www.wajr.com-- April 3, 2008
Rachel writes:
I grew up in Morgantown and now live in Charleston. I’ve always
thought of Morgantown as a proactive and enlightened city. I’m
disappointed each time I come home to visit and we go out to eat. I’m
always caught off guard when the hostess asks our smoking preference.
Admittedly, Kanawha County endured its own battled to get a smoking
ban, but we finally won that battle. It’s nice to be able to eat out
and not worry about inhaling smoke while we’re dining. There were times
when I was pregnant that we had to leave a restaurant because the smoke
was so bad – and we were seated in the non-smoking section! Let’s face
it: smoke doesn’t stay in one area of a restaurant. It permeates
through the air affecting us all. I hope that Monongalia County will
finally get on board and be clean and smoke-free county. |
Indoor Ban Leaves Lots of Room to Still Smoke THE
DOMINION POST -- April 2, 2008
A public smoking ban has worked for years in California — and reduced
the number of heart attacks in the first two years of its existence
there by 54,000 and a reduction in New York of nearly 4,000 heart
attacks in the first year after enactment. It’s important to realize
that the proposed ban in Monongalia County is chiefly on indoor
smoking. To listen to some smokers, you’d think it was yanking away
their cigarettes for good. I’m not sure how many of West Virginia’s
24,231 square miles are outdoors, but it’s got to be a lot. Wouldn’t
that seem to be enough for smokers?
Making public places in Mon County smoke-free is not an attack on
smokers. It is about ending secondhand smoke’s assault on the public
and workers. It’s about protecting the 82 percent of Monongalia County
residents who are nonsmokers and the 18 percent who are smokers from
the ugly by-products that foul our indoor air and poison us with
harmful toxins.
The majority of the toxins (84 percent) that cause chronic lung
diseases are in the secondhand smoke; bronchitis, emphysema, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease etc.
It’s only right that people who wait tables, make drinks and serve food
should also be able to work under conditions that don’t endanger their
health.
The federal Environmental Protection Agency has classified eight
substances as Group A Carcinogens. One of them is tobacco smoke. The
other seven, including asbestos, benzene, arsenic and radon, are
illegal in the workplace. There is no safe level of exposure to a
“Group A” carcinogen.
The fact should also be considered that nonsmokers who are fighting
lung cancer from secondhand smoke didn’t have much “freedom of choice”
in the matter to begin with.
When public smoking is banned, two things always happen at restaurants,
bars and hot spots: People eat, drink, or play the machines and then
some people go outside and smoke. That system is not too complicated to
understand. I work, shop, eat, visit, attend hospital appointments and
meetings and events in Monongalia County. Beverly Keener -- Fairmont |
Hope BOH’s Chico Does Right Thing in the End THE
DOMINION POST -- April 2, 2008 Public
health is getting a lot of visibility because of the proposed ban on
indoor smoking in public places. Two members of the [Monongalia County]
Board of Health have already stated they support clean indoor air in
all public places.
During the Board of Health meeting on Thursday, BOH Chairman Sam Chico
stated that he personally would like to protect himself and his family
from exposure to secondhand smoke.
Given his position in the community, I hope Chico will do everything in
his power to protect all families and all workers in the county from
the toxins in tobacco smoke. I urge Chico and all board members to
support public health and adopt a clean indoor air regulation that
protects everyone, with no exceptions. My grandson has asthma so I know how important smoke-free air is for people of all ages. Colletta Messenger -- Morgantown |
Morgantown City Council Endorses Smoke-free Air
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PREVENTING EXPOSURE TO SECONDHAND SMOKE
WHEREAS:
More than 100 scientific studies demonstrate that secondhand smoke is a
hazardous, cancer-causing air pollutant that causes disease and death
in health nonsmokers and elevates risk for disease for people exposed
to secondhand smoke; and
WHEREAS:
Local boards of health, municipalities, various public agencies and
private establishments in West Virginia have acted to protect the
public health from secondhand smoke by restricting smoking in enclosed
public places and places of employment.
WHEREAS: The Morgantown City Council was the first municipality in West Virginia to adopt a clean indoor air ordinance.
WHEREAS:
Countywide regulations have been adopted in all 55 West Virginia
counties and have won widespread support from the majority of the
public; and
WHEREAS: Policies to protect the public from secondhand smoke are most effective when they:
1)
are accompanied by consistent public education campaigns addressing the
harmful nature of secondhand smoke and
2) place emphasis on the benefits of smoke-free environments and workplaces; be it
RESOLVED:
That the undersigned organization joins the Coalition for a
Tobacco-Free West Virginia, American Cancer Society, American Heart
Association, the American Lung Association and the West Virginia
Hospital Association, and the Monongalia County Tobacco Prevention
Partnership in supporting policies that provide the maximum protection
from secondhand smoke in all public places and in places of
employment.
RESOLVED:
That the undersigned organization urges its state and local affiliates
and partners to join in the West Virginia campaign to prevent exposure
to secondhand smoke in public places and in the workplace.
The Morgantown City Council
| |
Why is Public Health So Important to Everyone? THE
DOMINION POST -- March 29, 2008
There has been a lot of coverage of the proposed smoking
regulation for Monongalia County. Many folks who have been promoting
the regulation are public health professionals. Public health is a
field geared toward serving others. Promoting health and preventing
disease and premature death are at its heart. Public health experts
come from a variety of professional backgrounds.
Doctors treat individuals; public health workers focus on the health of
the community as a whole. Public health involves food safety, water
supply, waste disposal and pollution. It involves improving access to
health care, controlling infectious disease, and reducing environmental
dangers and substance abuse. Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop
once said, “Health care is vital to all of us some of the time, but
public health is vital to all of us all of the time.”
We have a longer life expectancy today than we did 100 years ago
largely due to public health efforts. Public health leaders have taught
us that unclean water can cause disease, that drinking and driving
don’t mix, and that secondhand smoke is deadly.
Public health practitioners are motivated by only one thing: the desire
to continue to improve the health of our communities. Despite many
successes, much remains to be done. The elimination of secondhand smoke
in public places is among the most important public health efforts
today.
Public health workers often cooperate with government and community
leaders (such as our Board of Health) to create public policies that
solve local health problems. Right now, you are witnessing this in
action as public health practitioners work with the Mon County BOH to
enact a regulation that would protect our citizens from involuntary
exposure to secondhand smoke.
It has never been an easy road. Probably many Model T drivers resented
the first stop sign, which infringed on their liberty and questioned
their judgment to make the right decision. Most new regulations are
resented by those who have to adjust for the public welfare. But these
adjustments soon become second nature, and a healthier, cleaner
community is the end result. The Board of Health exists to protect the
citizens of this county. I feel confident that board members will
[eventually] vote to pass the proposed smoking regulation. The citizens
of Monongalia County should expect no less.
Valerie Frey-McClung Translational Tobacco Reduction Research Program WVU Health Sciences Center -- Morgantown | To the Monongalia County Board of Health:
Those
of us on the front lines of healthcare see everyday the damage caused
by smoking. We have no doubts that second-hand smoke is just as
hazardous.
The
ravages of tobacco smoke are reflected in the high numbers of West
Virginians with lung cancer, heart disease, and many other chronic
illness and disease. Those with allergies and asthma are affected
by even the briefest exposure.
Smoke-free
air is good for health and would be good for business as well. It
would make Monongalia County a more attractive place to live for
professionals and their families.
The
1992 passage of the current regulations to ban smoking in most public
places was a positive first step - but clearly, we need to do more.
We
fully support the ban on indoor smoking in all public spaces and
workplaces, including all bars and restaurants in Monongalia
County. Let's move forward and work together to make this a
healthier smoke-free community for all who live and work here.
Fred Butcher, Ph.D.
Interim Vice President, WVU Health Sciences
Bruce McClymonds
President & CEO, WVU Hospitals
Jeff Neely, MD
President and CEO, University Health Associates | West Virginia Brewing Company
As an individual
and business owner, I would support the ban of smoking in public places.
As we move toward a more encompassing approach to the overall health of
our communities, this is an issue that should not be overlooked or
swept aside.
It is an undisputed
fact that second hand smoke is harmful. It affects
everyone—not only is it a hazard for customers, but also for employees
who may be subjected to it for entire shifts. Installing smoke
evacuations systems and building separate enclosures is expensive,
often inadequate and is failing to address the entire issue.
An enforced ban
would give the support and impetus to public establishments to make
progressive changes as smoothly as possible.
Ned E. Strauser
Owner/Brewer, West Virginia Brewing Company | Damon's Grille
Damon's Grille
in Morgantown is proud to be a non-smoking establishment. The
fact that we are non-smoking has in no way kept the business from being
profitable, in fact it is just the opposite. Damon's
is one of the few places where a family or group of friends
get a good meal, enjoy each others company, and watch a game all while
enjoying a smoke-free environment. From the stand point of
our employees, we are able to watch out for their well-being
by providing them a smoke-free workplace.
If the County is
to go to a non-smoking standard, I feel that the regulations would have
to be the same for all places in the county (restaurant, bar, and any
other public place). The most effective way to
enforce the rule is for it to be even across the board. If
the regulations are the same for all, then there is no way in which
this can hurt ones' business.
Derick Haddix
Owner, Damons Grille
|
Reason for Smoking Ban Personal and Public THE
DOMINION POST -- March 27, 2008
I am in favor of the ban on smoking in all public places and
workplaces in Monongalia County. There are several reasons I support
smoke-free environments. At the top of the list is the fact that my
father was diagnosed with Stage 4 lung cancer a year and a half ago. I
have been with him through two surgeries, 38 radiation treatments and
six weeks of chemotherapy. He has had countless CT scans and PET scans
and basically spent an entire year of his life at the Mary Babb
Randolph Cancer Center. He has lost more than 30 pounds and, although
he is doing well, he has been through hell and back in the past year.
My father is a World War II veteran where companionship and free
cigarettes encouraged a smoking habit. According to his surgeon and
oncologist, his cancer is due to his nearly 30-year smoking habit.
Lung cancer is not limited to people who smoke. According to Dr. Ruth
Oratz, associate professor of clinical medicine at New York University
School of Medicine, 85 percent to 90 percent of lung-cancer cases occur
in smokers, but 20,000-25,000 people who were diagnosed with lung
cancer in America have never smoked.
A famous example of a nonsmoker dying only a few short months after
being diagnosed with lung cancer is Dana Reeves, the wife of the late
Christopher Reeves. Dr. Derek Raghaven, director of the Cleveland
Clinics Cancer Center, reported that Dana Reeves was a passive smoker.
He was interviewed after Reeves’ death and stated that she was a singer
early in her life and that she sang in places where cigarette smoking
was prevalent. Raghaven made the following comment regarding her death:
“One of the things that isn’t very well-known is that, in many ways,
passive smoking is much more dangerous than regular smoking, in the
sense that, when you inhale a cigarette, it’s hot, and uncomfortable,
and makes you cough. When you’re breathing in passive smoke, there
isn’t the same acute reaction. And so you, in fact, inhale more deeply.
So she was exposed to passive smoking, as happens in so many parts of
the USA. We just haven’t got legislation that’s state-of-theart to
protect us.”
This is where the authority of the Monongalia County Board of Health
comes in and they have a chance to be “state-of-the-art.” They are
mandated by state law to protect the health of the citizens of the
county. As such, I believe that they have no other choice but to enact
the 100 percent smoke-free regulation that will protect our citizens
from this disease that has affected my life on a personal level and the
lives of many others who have been faced with lung cancer. Trisha M. Petitte, RN -- Morgantown |
Secondhand-Smoke Facts Help with the Decision THE
DOMINION POST -- March 26, 2008
As associate
director of the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, I am keenly and
sometimes painfully aware of the cancer burden in our state. The causes
of many cancers remain uncertain to researchers and health-care
providers. One cancer cause, however, is certain — tobacco. Here are a
few fast facts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Tobacco smoke affects every major organ in the body. Cigarette smoking alone is directly responsible for almost 30 percent of all U.S. cancer deaths each year. Cigarette smoking causes almost 90 percent of lung cancer deaths.
Exposure to secondhand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer.
Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke increase their risk of
developing lung cancer by 20-30 percent. Secondhand smoke
causes more than 3,000 lung cancer deaths among U.S. nonsmokers every
year. Nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke inhale many of the same
cancer-causing poisons as smokers. As part of my responsibility
in the cancer center, I lead a Translational Tobacco Reduction Research
Program. My charge is to make sure tobacco prevention research does not
stop when we complete the study, but that it becomes the basis for
services to help people kick the tobacco habit. Still, despite
all our research, despite the effective programs, our hands are tied
when it comes to the issue of secondhand smoke in our community. We can
teach people how to quit smoking, but not how to quit breathing.
Science has established that there is no safe level of exposure to
secondhand smoke. Beyond cancer risks, secondhand smoke can bring on
asthma attacks and heart attacks, and lead to heart disease and other
health problems. Most of the public is aware that secondhand
smoke is bad for our health. This is not an attack on smokers
themselves — it is simply a fact. I am a former smoker; I know the
challenges of quitting. This is an issue of choice and of protecting
those who are exposed to secondhand smoke without a choice. The people
who provide the education about secondhand smoke have done their jobs
well. Now those who are in a position to ban smoking in public places
must do their jobs. I call on the members of the Monongalia County
Board of Health to protect our citizens by enacting a regulation
banning smoking in all public places. It’s the right thing to
do. I believe our county can be a leader in the efforts to make West
Virginia a healthy place to live and work — and breathe. Kimberly Horn WVU Associate Professor Department of Community Medicine |
Why Board of Health has Duty to Do Right Thing THE
DOMINION POST -- March 26, 2008 When listening to talk about the clean air/smoking ordinance, some thoughts came to mind. (1) No logical argument can be made to justify the deliberate damaging of one’s health or that of others.
(2) No argument can change the facts about the consequences of burning
cigarettes, that they cause health problems, some deadly.
(3) To the smoker who would argue about the health issue, I would say
simply, save your breath. The verdict is clear. (4) If cigarettes/tobacco were on trial for murder, they would be convicted. (5) It is the Board of Health, not the board of tobacco, not the board of business. Just health.
(6) Two board members have made it clear what they have decided, and
three are making it clear that they are afraid to go against their
buddies.
(7) The Board of Health is usually an easy volunteer gig, and pretty
lucrative, getting paid $100 per meeting (when I was on the BOH it was
$10). But sometimes it is no place for cowards.
(8) The radio survey responders were overwhelmingly in support of the
new smoking ordinance. So if this is a democracy, and the BOH is
listening, the ordinance will be adopted. But only if it is a
democracy. (9) Nonsmokers are the majority and becoming more so.
(10) To any smoker, I would say, I don’t care if you smoke ... it’s fun
and I enjoyed it for years. You don’t have to convince me of your right
to smoke. All you need to do is keep it to yourself because you’re the
one who wants to do it. (11) As far as a legal right to smoke, there is no such thing.
(12) Because of the nature of smoke, smoking is difficult for smokers
who want to enjoy their freedom of choice and allow others the same
privilege.
(13) I called the radio station to ask a question of the gentleman who
was against the smoking ordinance, but the lines were full and I didn’t
get on. I was going to ask him: Are you arguing against this ordinance
because you’re concerned about health, or because you’re concerned
about money? (14) And ... Do you think the BOH is or should be
concerned about health? Or about money? (15) To BOH members (that is,
the three who are going to vote against the ordinance if it ever comes
to a vote), I would say don’t be afraid to do the right thing. I mean
the right health thing. Remember, your name will go down in this
county’s history.
Betty Lemley Wiley -- Westover |
GUEST COMMENTARY 15 Years Later, County Waiting on BOH to Act THE
DOMINION POST -- March 23, 2008
By Robert Anderson
In April 1992, Monongalia County was the first county in our
state to restrict smoking. This was done thanks to a forward-thinking
board of health. That 1992 regulation was so weak it borders on being
laughable today (e.g., 50 percent of restaurant seating had to be
“smoke free”), but at the time it was a milestone. In 2008, there isn’t
any laughter. But there is coughing. We now have one of the weakest
smoking regulations in West Virginia. Monongalia
County enjoys relatively high income and education levels — two
indicators of a low smoking rate — yet our current regulation, though
stronger than the original one, permits tobacco smoke pollution in
restaurants, bars and other worksites, even though the U.S. surgeon
general concluded in 2006 that there was no such thing as a safe level
of secondhand smoke. At a board of health meeting in
January there were people from bars and gambling establishments who
argued against the proposed smoking ban. They claimed the current
regulation was working. However, at that meeting, a health department
staff member advised that she has been to businesses that, upon seeing
her, suddenly turned on exhaust fans, or closed doors.
In other words, even the current regulation is not being observed in
all cases, never mind the fact that even when the regulation is adhered
to, it does not eliminate smoking pollution anyway.
An opponent also said at that meeting, “If you are going to do this,
include everyone. Let’s level the playing field.” In this case, that is
on the money. Let’s make it equal for everyone. Let’s have a county
where all workers are assured of a smokefree working environment.
However, even smoke-free offices may not really be smokefree. I have a
friend who runs a nonprofit organization. Last August, she told the BOH
that secondhand smoke was entering her offices, courtesy of a gambling
business that leases space next to hers in a strip mall. Until we have
a comprehensive regulation, problems such as these will continue.
Anything short of a complete ban in all worksites means that some
people are denied public health assured for others. One of the
arguments that smoking advocates make is that the government does not
have the right to interfere with how a business chooses to operate.
Making such a statement ignores the fact that all bars and restaurants
are subject to health regulations that staff from the health department
enforce. It is amazing that if someone spits into a plate of food being
served to a customer, that would, of course, be a violation. Yet, in a
bar or sections of restaurants, people can smoke all they want, pollute
the air for everyone, including employees, and the sanitarian cannot do
anything. Long before anyone else, the tobacco
industry recognized that secondhand smoke was an issue it could not
overcome. That is, masters as they were at conning smokers into
believing that “light” cigarettes were less hazardous, they knew as
early as the 1970s that secondhand smoke was going to be a problem for
them. The best they could hope to do was claim that smokers somehow had
a “right” to smoke wherever they wanted, and that restaurants and
nonsmokers should accommodate them. Then, in early
1993, the EPA announced its finding that secondhand smoke was a Group A
carcinogen. Millions of tobacco industry documents are available
online. One tobacco document I found included this 1993 assessment that
a consultant provided to Philip Morris: “... [N]ot only do people
believe what the EPA is saying about second-hand smoke, but they appear
to have internalized it as well.” Internalized indeed. This same
document
| |