|
An
argument that smoke-free opponents are now using is that passing a
clean indoor air regulation will hurt businesses. We've read in
the paper that going smoke-free is going to drive customers
into adjoining states, put bar
owners into bankruptcy and raise unemployment. Quite frankly,
we're about as sick of hearing these lies as we are of breathing smoke.
When the first
clean air regulation was enacted, nobody could dispute these claims because
nobody really knew what would happen. Today there is overwhelming
scientific evidence that going smoke-free has no negative economic effects in communities worldwide.
Please
explore the evidence for yourself. Some of the actual studies are
linked in the references sections of these documents.
Smoke-Free Policies Do Not Hurt the Hospitality Industry
Economic Impacts of SmokeFree Laws: Case Studies
Visual Summary of Smokefree Law Economic Impact Studies
Economics Resource Library from TobaccoScam.org
The Economic Impacts of Clean Indoor Air Laws
In
addition to the possibility of actually increasing sales, going
smoke-free has been shown to have other positive impacts on
business: a
healthier workforce with less absenteeism, reduced maintenance
and housekeeping costs, and less damage to property and furnishings. Smoke-free establishments may also be able to negotiate lower
insurance rates.
We have heard the opposition's arguments, put forth by many of the
same people, in our very community twice before -- when the original
clean indoor air regulation was passed and again when the law was
tightened in 1999. Nobody did any scientific research, but just
ask yourself this question: Is there any evidence to suggest that our
current clean indoor air laws have hurt Morgantown's economy? Think about it. We
submit that our anecdotal and scientific evidence is much better than anything the opposition has to offer.
Breathing smoke-free air is good for customers, workers and business owners, too. That's the real bottom line.
|